Gendering Emotions Work in Primary Schools: “Effortless” or “Important”?

References

• Acker, S. (1995). Chapter 3: Gender and teachers’ work. Review of Research in Education, 21(1), 99–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X021001099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailwood, J. (2007). Mothers, teachers, maternalism and early childhood education and care: Some historical connections. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2007.8.2.157
   Google Scholar
• Ailwood, J. (2008). Mothers, teachers, maternalism and early childhood education and care: Some historical connections. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. 8(2), 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2010). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, H. (2015). Results of the systematic review on nurture groups’ effectiveness. The International Journal of Nurture in Education, 1(1), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borve, H. E. (2016). Men in kindergartens: Work culture and gender. Early Child Development & Care, 187(7), 1083–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1154853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I: Attachment. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, M. (2002). Nurture groups in school: Principles and practice. Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. [Online]. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018-online
   Google Scholar
• Brownhill, S. (2014). ‘Build me a male role model!’ a critical exploration of the perceived qualities/characteristics of men in the early years (0–8) in England. Gender and Education, 26(3), 246–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownhill, S., & Oates, R. (2016). Who do you want me to be? An exploration of female and male perceptions of “imposed” gender roles in the early years. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 45(5), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1164215
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Tiknaz, Y. (2005). Progress and challenge in Nurture Groups: Evidence from three case studies. British Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2005.00399.x
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Whitebread, D. (2007). The effectiveness of Nurture Groups on student progress: Evidence from a national research study. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 12(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750701489915
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, L., Hartwell, B. K., & Kreppner, J. (2019). Exploring the impact of Nurture Groups on children’s social skills: A mixed-methods approach. Educational Psychology in Practice: Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Psychology, 35(4), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2019.1615868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ruiter, J. A., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Koomena, H. M. Y. (2021). Teachers’ emotional labor in response to daily events with individual students: The role of teacher-student relationship quality. Teaching & Teacher Education, 107(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103467
   Google Scholar
• Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (2005). Mothering, class and rationality. The Sociological Review, 53(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymniki, A., Taylor, R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfer, P., Goldschmied, E., & Selleck, D. (2003). Key persons in the nursery: Building relationships for quality provision. David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N. (2012). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. (2017). Emotional pedagogy and the gendering of social and emotional learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1073102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. M., & Slesaransky-Poe, G. (2010). The heteronormative classroom: Questioning and liberating practices. The Teacher Educator, 45(4), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.508271
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstenblatt, P., Faulkner, M., Lee, A., Doan, L. T., & Travis, D. (2014). Not babysitting: Work stress and well-being for family child care providers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0571-4
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2001). The transformation of intimacy, sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorising practices in households. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., & Kusché, C. (2002). Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS), blueprints for violence prevention. Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spill-over, and sex at work: A comparison of men’s and women’s experiences. Human Relations, 40(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678704000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, D., & Tukonic, S. (2016). Babysitter or professional? Perceptions of professionalism narrated by Ontario early childhood educators. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 589–600.
   Google Scholar
• Henninck, M. M. (2014). Focus group discussions: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., Kalambouka, A., Bolton, J., Lendrum, A., Wigelsworth, M., Lennie, C., & Farrell, P. (2008). Primary Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL): Evaluation of small group work. DfES Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ivinson, G., & Murphy, P. (2007). Rethinking single-sex teaching: Gender, school subjects and learning. Single sex schooling. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2007). Millennium man: Constructing identities of male teachers in early years contexts. Educational Review, 59(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910701254973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephidou, J. (2020). A gendered contribution to play? Perceptions of early childhood education and care (ECEC) practitioners in England on how their gender influences their approaches to play. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 40(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2019.1655713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kook, R., Harel-Shalev, A., & Yuval, F. (2019). Focus groups and the collective construction of meaning: Listening to minority women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 72, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J. (2017). Empowering young people through conflict and conciliation: Attending to the political and agonism in democratic education. Democracy & Education, 25(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lumadi, M. W., & Shongwe, S. S. (2010). The need for training gender-sensitive teachers: Addressing education challenges for gender sensitive national development. Contemporary Issues in Educational Research, 3(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v3i3.185
   Google Scholar
• Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). Many faces of love. Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Macan Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malaby, M., & Ramsey, S. (2011). The dilemmas of male elementary preservice teachers. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 13(1–2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mallozzi, C. A., & Campbell-Galman, S. (2014). Guys and “the rest of us”: Tales of gendered aptitude and experience in educational care work. Gender and Education, 26(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.901724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maratos, F. A., Matos, M., Albuquerque, I., Wood, W., Palmeira, L., Cunha, M., Lima, M. P., & Gilbert, P. (2020). Exploring the international utility of progressing compassionate mind training in school settings: A comparison of implementation effectiveness of the same curricula in the UK and Portugal. The Psychology of Education Review, 44(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2020.44.2.73
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., Haase, M., & Charlot, B. (2008). Being the “right” kind of male teacher: The disciplining of John. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 16(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360701877792
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odih, P. (2002). Mentors and role models: Masculinity and the educational ‘underachievement’ of young Afro-Caribbean males. Race Ethnicity and Education, 5(1), 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2005). Who cares? The classed nature of childcare. Gender and Education, 17(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2010). Reconstructing professionalism in ECEC: The case for the “critically reflective emotional professional. Early Years, 30(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2010.490905
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. (2012). Narratives from the nursery: Negotiating professional identities in early childhood. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J. (2018). Characterising the principles of professional love in early childhood care and education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1459508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recchia, S. L., Shin, M., & Snaider, C. (2018). Where is the love? Developing loving relationships as an essential component of professional infant care. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1461614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, J., & Le Mare, L. (2017). Supporting teachers in relational pedagogy and social emotional education: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Emotional Education, 9(1), 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S., MacKay, T., & Kearney, M. (2009). Nurture groups: A large-scale, controlled study of effects on development and academic attainment. British Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2009.00445.x
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. H., & Jones-Diaz, C. J. (2006). Diversity and difference in early childhood. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roffey, S. (2017). The ASPIRE principles and pedagogy for the implementation of social and emotional learning and whole school wellbeing. International Journal of Emotional Education, 9(2), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Sabol, T., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. (2007). Helping children thrive at school: The effectiveness of nurture groups. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360601154600
   Google Scholar
• Sohee, L. M. (2014). Gender-sensitive sex education for the youth in Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2014.11666185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, M., Vandenbroeck, M., Van Laere, K., Lazzari, A., & Peeters, J. (2012). Towards competent systems in early childhood education and care. European Journal of Education, 47(4), 508–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, E. M. (2022). Social emotional learning and cultural relevancy: Real world challenges. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 67(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2109565
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, K. (2017). “It’s small steps, but that leads to bigger changes”: Evaluation of a nurture group intervention. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 22(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2017.1290882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2014). The status of care: Linking gender and “educare”. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.754346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2015). Pioneers, professionals, playmates, protectors, “poofs” and “paedos”: Swedish male pre-school teachers’ construction of their identities. In S. Brownhill, J. Warin, & I. Wenersson (Eds.), Men, masculinities and teaching in early childhood education: International perspectives on gender and care (pp. 95–106). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2018). Men in early childhood and care: Gender balance and flexibility. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2019). Conceptualising the value of male practitioners in early childhood education and care: Gender balance or gender flexibility. Gender and Education, 31(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1380172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warin, J., & Adriany, V. (2017). Gender flexible pedagogy in early childhood education. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1105738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A. (2021). Love in early childhood teaching: Reading data diffractively with Deleuzo-Guattarian concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(7), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1771462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Stratton, C. (2011). The incredible years: Parents, teachers, and children’s training series. Incredible Years Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wigelsworth, M., Mason, C., Verity, L., Humphrey, N., & Qualter, P. (2023). A rose by any other name? Using core components to categorize social and emotional learning provision. School Mental Health, 15(3), 710–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-023-09585-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigelswoth, M., Lendrum, A., Oldfield, J., Scott, A., ten Bokkel, I., Tae, K., & Emery, C. (2016). The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: A meta-analysis. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(3), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1195791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208323054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P. (2024). The interpretation and use of social and emotional learning in British primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(10), 2201–2217.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2018). Political emotions in the classroom: How affective citizenship education illuminates the debate between agonists and deliberators. Democracy & Education, 26(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar