The role of nutrient solution composition on the uptake of nutrients, growth and vase life of tulips grown hydroponically under South African conditions

References

• Algera L. 1936. Concerning the influence of temperature treatment on the carbohydrate metabolism, the respiration and the morphological development of the tulip. Proces-verbaal van de koninklijke Nederlandse akademie van wetenschappen 39: 846–855.
   Google Scholar
• Benschop M, de Hertogh AA. 1971. Post-harvest development of cut tulip flowers. Acta Horticulturae 23: 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bester C, Blomerus LM, Kleynhans R. 2009. Development of new floriculture crops in South Africa. Acta Horticulturae 813: 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Charles-Edwards DA, Rees AR. 1975. An analysis of the growth of forced tulips. 1. Changes in the plant fresh and dry weights during growth at two temperatures. Scientia Horticulturae 3: 309–316.
   Google Scholar
• Cheal WF, Hewitt EJ. 1964. The effects of rates of supply of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and magnesium on leaf and stem growth, flowering and “topple” of ‘Golden Harvest’ and ‘Elmus’ tulip. Annals of Applied Biology 53: 447–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combrink NJJ, Kempen E. 2011. Nutrient solution management. Cape Town: Combrink Family Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Conway WS, Sams CE, Hickey KD. 2001. Pre- and postharvest calcium treatment of apple fruit and its effect on quality. Acta Horticulturae 594: 413–419.
   Google Scholar
• de Hertogh AA, Blakely N, Barrett J. 1978. Fertilization of special precooled (5°C) tulips for cut-flower forcing. Scientia Horticulturae 9: 167–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hertogh AA, Le Nard M. 1993. The physiology of flower bulbs: a comprehensive treatise on the physiology and utilization of ornamental flowering bulbous and tuberous plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• de Marco R, Phan C. 2003. Determination of phosphate in hydroponic nutrient solutions using flow injection potentiometry and a cobalt-wire phosphate ion-selective electrode. Talanta 60: 1215–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortanier EJ. 1973. Reviewing the length of the generation period and its shortening, particularly in tulips. Scientia Horticulturae 1: 107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Gill S, Schuster C, Anacker R, Wadkins S, Klick S. 2009. Production of tulips as cut flowers. Maryland Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet 837. College Park: University of Maryland Cooperative Extension.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Merino P, Ramírez-Martínez M, Rodríguez-Mendoza MN, Sánchez-García P, Sandoval-VIlea M, Trejo-Téllez L. 2009. Potassium/calcium ratios of the nutrient solution on tulip nutrient status. Acta Horticulturae 843: 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Grier CG, Running SW. 1977. Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology 58: 893–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo WJ, Lin YZ, Lee N. 2012. Photosynthetic light requirements and effects of low irradiance and daylength on Phalaenopsis amabilis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 137: 465–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy AH. 1976. Treatments to improve water balance of cut flowers. Acta Horticulturae 64: 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Ho LC, Rees AR. 1975. Re-mobilization and redistribution of reserves in the tulip bulb in relation to new growth until anthesis. New Phytologist 76: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho LC, Rees A. 1977. The contribution of current photosynthesis to growth and development in the tulip during flowering. New Phytologist 78: 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inamoto K, Hase T, Doi M, Imanishi H. 2000. Effects of duration of bulb chilling on dry matter distribution in hydroponically forced tulips. Scientia Horticulturae 85: 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamenetsky R. 2005. Production of flower bulbs in regions with warm climates. Acta Horticulturae 673: 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kamenetsky R, Okubo H. 2013. Ornamental geophytes: from basic science to sustainable production. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan FU, Jhon AQ, Khan FA, Mir MM. 2006. Effect of NPK and Zn on growth, flowering and bulb production in tulip under polyhouse conditions in Kashmir. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 1: 129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Klougart A. 1980. Calcium uptake of tulips during forcing. Acta Horticulturae 109: 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrechts H, Rook F, Kolloffel C. 1994. Carbohydrate status of tulip bulbs during cold-induced flower stalk elongation and flowering. Plant Physiology 104: 515–520.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WH, Kim JH, Lee AK, Suh JK, Yang YJ. 2004. Effects of nutrient solution management and methods of storage and distribution on flowering and quality of cut iris, tulip and lily. Acta Horticulturae 673: 513–518.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KH, Suh JK. 2005. Effects of nutrient solution composition and plant growth retardants on growth and flowering in hydroponics of cut tulip. Acta Horticulturae 673: 519–523.
   Google Scholar
• Lötze E, Theron KI. 2007. Evaluating the effectiveness of pre-harvest calcium applications for bitter pit control in ‘Golden Delicious’ apples under South African conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30: 471–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meziane D, Shipley B. 2001. Direct and indirect relationships between specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen and leaf gas exchange. Effects of irradiance and nutrient supply. Annals of Botany 88: 915–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PV, Niedziela CE. 1998. Effects of calcium source and temperature regime on calcium deficiency during hydroponic forcing of tulip. Scientia Horticulturae 73: 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio B, Trejo LI, González JL, Rodríguez MN, Jiménez S, Lao MT. 2009. Quality of cut tulip sp. with different nutrition sources. Acta Horticulturae 847: 333–336.
   Google Scholar
• Pasterkamp HP. 1996. Factors determining the quality of tulips. Acta Horticulturae 430: 447–452.
   Google Scholar
• Rees AR. 1969. Effect of bulb size on the growth of tulips. Annals of Botany 33: 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley D, Barber SA. 1971. Effect of ammonium and nitrate fertilization on phosphorus uptake as related to root-induced pH changes at the root-soil interface. Soil Science Society of America Journal 35: 301–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AN, Moeller FW. 1970. Vegetative and flowering responses of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. cultivars to cold and long day treatment as related to bulb maturity. Acta Horticulturae 23: 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Silber A, Bar-Tal A. 2008. Nutrition of substrate-grown plants. In: Raviv M, Lieth JH (eds), Soilless culture: theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 291–339.
   Google Scholar
• Sochacki D, Chojnowska E. 2004. Quality evaluation of forced tulip flowers depending on bulb production environment and forcing medium. Acta Horticulturae 673: 675–678.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner AA. 1961. A universal method for preparing nutrient solutions of a certain desired composition. Plant and Soil 15: 134–154.
   Google Scholar
• Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2010. Plant physiology (5th edn). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Uragami A, Yamada M, Yamasaki A. 2002. Hydroponic forcing of tulip using a nutrient film technique. Acta Horticulturae 570: 423–427.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn WG, Perik RR, Abadie P, Harkema H. 2011. A treatment to improve the vase life of cut tulips: effects on tepal senescence, tepal abscission, leaf yellowing and stem elongation. Postharvest Biology and Technology 61: 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar