Where are we with whole regolith pedology? A comparative study from BrazilFootnote

This article is based on a paper presented at the 5th International Soil Classification Congress, 5–7 December 2016, Bloemfontein, South Africa

References

• Ab’Sáber AB. 2003. Os domínios da natureza no Brasil: potencialidades paisagísticas. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Moraes Gonçalves JL, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22: 711–728. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best MG. 2003. Igneous and metamorphic petrology (2nd edn). Malden: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 1973. Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do Rio Grande do Sul. DNPEA Boletim Técnico 30. Recife: Ministério da Agricultura-DNPEA-DPP [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Brevik EC, Calzolari C, Miller BA, Pereira P, Kabala C, Baumgarten A, Jordán A. 2016. Soil mapping, classification, and modeling: history and future directions. Geoderma 264: 256–274. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik EC, Miller BA. 2015. The use of soil surveys to aid in geologic mapping with an emphasis on the Eastern and Midwestern United States. Soil Horizons 56. DOI: 10.2136/sh15-01-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Buol SW. 1994. Saprolite-regolith taxonomy: an approximation. In: Cremeens DL, Brown RB, Huddleston JH (eds), Whole regolith pedology. SSSA Special Publication 34. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. pp 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JB, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108: 583–595. doi: 10.1007/BF00329030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva AO, Queluz JTG, Klar AE. 2013. Spatial distribution of climatic water balance in different rainfall regimes in the State of Pernambuco. Brazilian Journal of Applied Technology for Agricultural Science 6: 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fallou FA. 1862. Pedologie oder allgemeine und besondere Bodenkunde. Dresden: G Schönfeld’s Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2006. Guidelines for soil description (4th edn). Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira VP, Sial AN. 1986. The peralkalic magmatism in the Precambrian Cachoeirinha-Salgueiro fold belt, northeast Brazil: geochemical aspects. Revista Brasileira de Geociência 16: 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Frank HT, Gomes MEB, Formoso MLL. 2009. Review of the extent and the volume of the Serra Geral Formation, Paraná Basin, South America. Pesquisas em Geociências 36: 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielli CP, McDonnell JJ, Jarvis WT. 2012. The role of bedrock groundwater in rainfall-runoff response at hillslope and catchment scales. Journal of Hydrology 450: 117–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill R. 2010. Igneous rocks and processes: a practical guide. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JM, Bishop TF, Wilford, JR. 2016. Lithology and soil relationships for soil modelling and mapping. Catena 147: 429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartemink AE. 2016. The definition of soil since the early 1800s. Advances in Agronomy 137: 73–126. doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps: update 2015. World Soil Resources Reports 106. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Jabiol B, Zanella A, Ponge JF, Sartori G, Englisch M, van Delft B, de Waal R, Le Bayon RC, 2013. A proposal for including humus forms in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB-FAO). Geoderma 192: 286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacomine PKT, Cavalcanti AC, Burgos N, Pessoa SCP, Silveira CO. 1973. Levantamento exploratório - reconhecimento de solos do Estado de Pernambuco. MA-DNPEA-DPP Boletim Técnico no. 26, SUDENE Série Pedologia no. 14. Recife: Ministério da Agricultura; SUDENE [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Juilleret J, Dondeyne S, Vancampenhout K, Deckers J, Hissler C. 2016. Mind the gap: a classification system for integrating subsolum into soil surveys. Geoderma 264: 332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juilleret J, Jiffly JF, Hoffmann L, Hissler C. 2012. The potential of soil survey as a tool for subsurface geological mapping: a case study in a hydrological experimental catchment (Huewelerbach, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg). Geologica Belgica 15: 36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg CE. 1937 Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication no. 274. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H. 2010. Earth’s Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 14: 25–45. doi: 10.5194/hess-14-25-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanheiro TJ, Yamamoto JK, Kihara Y. 2004. Serra Geral Formation – São Paulo State, Brazil: a potential source for natural pozzolans. Materials Letters 58: 876–881. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2003.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moragues-Quiroga C, Juilleret J, Gourdol L, Pelt E, Perrone T, Aubert A, Morvan G, Chabaux F, Legout A. Stille P, Hissler C. 2017. Genesis and evolution of regoliths: evidence from trace and major elements and Sr-Nd-Pb-U isotopes. Catena 149: 185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardy AJR, Machado FB, Oliveira MAF. 2008. As rochas vulcânicas mesozóicas ácidas da Bacia do Paraná: litoestratigrafia e considerações geoquímicoestratigráficas. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 38: 178–195 [in Portuguese]. doi: 10.25249/0375-7536.2008381178195
   Google Scholar
• Nardy AJR, Rosa MC, Luchetti ACF, Ferreira MLC, Machado FB, Oliveira MAF. 2011. Parâmetros físicos pré-eruptivos do magmatismo ácido da Província Magmática do Paraná: resultados preliminares. UNESP. Geociências 30: 575–588 [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Neves SP. 2003. Proterozoic history of the Borborema province (NE Brazil): correlations with neighboring cratons and Pan-African belts and implications for the evolution of western Gondwana. Tectonics 22: 1031. doi: 10.1029/2001TC001352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedron FA. 2007. Mineralogia, morfologia e classificação de saprolitos e neossolos derivados de rochas vulcânicas no Rio Grande do Sul. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Peulvast JP, Bétard F. 2015. Landforms and landscape evolution of the equatorial margin of northeast Brazil: an overview. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Richter DdeB Jr, Mobley ML. 2009. Monitoring Earth’s Critical Zone. Science 326: 1067–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.1179117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, Oliveira VA, Lumbreras JF, Coelho MR, Almeida JA, Cunha TJF, Oliveira JB. 2013. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos (3rd edn). Brasilia: EMBRAPA [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Santos JCB. 2015. Saprolitologia aplicada à gênese e às implicações ambientais de regolitos do Estado de Pernambuco. PhD thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Santos RD dos, de Lemos RC, dos Santos HG, Ker JC, dos Anjos LHC. 2005. Manual de descrição e coleta de solo no campo (5th edn). Viçosa: Sociedad Brasileira de Ciência de Solo; Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa-CNPS [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Sartori PLP, Gomes CB. 1980. Composição químico-mineralógica das últimas manifestações vulcânicas da região de Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 52: 125–133 [in Portuguese].
   Google Scholar
• Shaw CF. 1927. Report of committee on soil terminology. American Soil Survey Association Bulletin 8: 66–98.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. US Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy (12th edn). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• SCWG (Soil Classification Working Group). 1991. Soil classification: a taxonomic system for South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Agricultural Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tandarich JP, Darmody RG, Follmer LR. 1994. The pedo-weathering profile: a paradigm for whole-regolith pedology from the Glaciated Midcontinental United States of America. In: Cremeens DL, Brown RB, Huddleston JH (eds), Whole regolith pedology. SSSA Special Publication 34. Madison: Soil Science Society of America. pp 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Turner DP. 2013. A revised perspective on principles of soil classification in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 30: 119–120. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2013.804602
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk DC, Riddler AMH, Rowe RK. 1968. Criteria and problems in groundsurface correlations with reference to a regional correlation in south-eastern Australia. In: Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Soil Science, Adelaide, Australia, 1968, vol. 4. Sydney: International Society of Soil Science and Angus and Robertson. pp 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• van Huyssteen CW, Micheli E, Fuchs M, Waltner I. 2014. Taxonomic distance between South African diagnostic horizons and the World Reference Base diagnostics. Catena 113: 276–280. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin BP. 1999. The return of the “other” soil scientists. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 70: 1–4. doi: 10.4141/S98-044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrede S, Fenicia, F, Martínez-Carreras N, Juilleret J, Hissler C, Krein A, Savenije HHG, Uhlenbrook S, Kavetski D, Pfister L. 2015. Towards more systematic perceptual model development: a case study using 3 Luxembourgish catchments. Hydrological Processes 29: 2731–2750. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki DA, Schoeneberger PJ, LaGarry HE. 2005. Soil surveys: a window to the subsurface. Geoderma 126: 167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaalon DH. 1995. The soils we classify: essay review of recent publications on soil taxonomy. Catena 24: 233–241. doi: 10.1016/0341-8162(95)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar