References
- Daniell A, van Deventer PW. 2018. An overview of pedogenesis in Technosols in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 281–291.
- Devillers R, Bédard Y, Jeansoulin R, Moulin B. 2007. Towards spatial data quality information analysis tools for experts assessing the fitness for use of spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21: 261–282. doi: 10.1080/13658810600911879
- Dokuchaev VV. 1883. The Russian chernozem (transl. N Kaner, 1967). Springfield: US Department of Commerce.
- Fanning DS, Fanning MCB. 1989. Soil morphology, genesis, and classification. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Galbraith JM, Stolt MH, Rabenhorst MC, Ransom MD. 2018. Impacts of fundamental changes to Soil Taxonomy. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 263–267.
- Ibáñez JJ, Ruiz-Ramos M. 2006. A mathematical comparison of classification structures: the case of USDA Soil Taxonomy. Eurasian Soil Science 39: 712–719. doi: 10.1134/S1064229306070040
- IUSS Working Group WRB. 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports no. 106. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Juilleret J, Azevedo AC, Santos RA, Santos JCB, Pedron FA, Dondeyne S. 2018. Where are we with whole regolith pedology? A comparative study from Brazil. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 251–261.
- Krasilnikov P, Martí JJI, Arnold R, Shoba S. 2009. A handbook of soil terminology, correlation and classification. London: Routledge.
- Menezes AR, Fontana A, Anjos LHC. 2018. Spodosols in Brazil: distribution, characteristics and diagnostic attributes of spodic horizons. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 241–250.
- Miller G. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Physiological Reviews 63: 81–97.
- Owens PR, Hempel J, Michéli E, McBratney A. 2014. Advancing towards a universal soil classification system. Geophysical Research Abstracts 16: EGU2014–16432.
- Pinheiro HSK, Anjos LHC, Xavier PAM, Chagas CS, Carvalho Junior W. 2018. Quantitative pedology to evaluate a soil profile collection from the Brazilian semi-arid region. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 269–279.
- Roth WM. 2005. Making classifications (at) work: ordering practices in science. Social Studies of Science 35: 581–621. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052102
- Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy (12th edn). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
- Tichý L, Tichá H, Nagels P, Callaerts R, Mertens R, Vlček M. 1999. Optical properties of amorphous As-Se and Ge-As- Se thin films. Materials Letters 39: 122–128. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(98)00227-4
- van Huyssteen CW, Turner DP, le Roux PAL. 2013. Principles of soil classification and the future of the South African system. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 30: 23–32. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2013.771752
- Wessel BM, Galbraith JM, Stolt MH, Rabenhorst MC, DS Fanning, Levin MJ. 2018. Soil taxonomy proposals for acid sulfate soils and subaqueous soils raised by the 8th International Acid Sulfate Soils Conference. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 35: 283–285.
- Wong EKL, Richmond GL. 1993. Examination of the surface second harmonic response from noble metal surfaces at infrared wavelengths. Journal of Chemical Physics 99: 5500–5508. doi: 10.1063/1.465967