Correlation and path coefficient analyses of yield and yield components in drought-tolerant bread wheat populations

References

• Ahmadizadeh M, Shahbazi H, Valizadeh M, Zaefizadeh M. 2011. Genetic diversity of durum wheat landraces using multivariate analysis under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 2294–2302.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed N, Chowdhry MA, Khaliq I, Maekawa M. 2007. The inheritance of yield and yield components of five wheat hybrid populations under drought conditions. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 8: 53–59. doi: 10.21082/ijas.v8n2.2007.p53-59
   Google Scholar
• Akram S, Hussain BN, Al Bari MA, Burritt DJ, Hossain MA. 2016. Genetic variability and association analysis of soybean (Glycine max (l.) Merrill) for yield and yield attributing traits. Plant Gene and Trait 7: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Altenbach S, DuPont F, Kothari K, Chan R, Johnson E, Lieu D. 2003. Temperature, water and fertilizer influence the timing of key events during grain development in a US spring wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 37: 9–20. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.2002.0483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar J, Ali M, Hussain M, Sabir W, Khan M, Zulkiffal M, Abdullah M. 2009. Assessment of yield criteria in bread wheat through correlation and path analysis. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 19: 185–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbetti M, You M, Li H, Ma X, Sivasithamparam K. 2007. Management of root diseases of annual pasture legumes in Mediterranean ecosystems-a case study of subterranean clover root diseases in the south-west of Western Australia. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 46: 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello O, Abdulmaliq S, Afolabi M, Ige S. 2010. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and agronomic characters among open pollinated maize varieties and their F1 hybrids in a diallel cross. African Journal of Biotechnology 9: 2633–2639.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis T, Halford N. 2014. Food security: the challenge of increasing wheat yield and the importance of not compromising food safety. Annals of Applied Biology 164: 354–372. doi: 10.1111/aab.12108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dababat AA, Imren M, Erginbas-Orakci G, Ashrafi S, Yavuzaslanoglu E, Toktay H, Pariyar SR, Elekcioglu HI, Morgounov A, Mekete T. 2015. The importance and management strategies of cereal cyst nematodes, Heterodera spp., in Turkey. Euphytica 202: 173–188. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1269-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabi A, Mekbib F, Desalegn T. 2016. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and path analysis of yield and yield contributing traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management 1: 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2010. Wheat production guideline. Pretoria: DAFF.
   Google Scholar
• Del Pozo A, Yáñez A, Matus IA, Tapia G, Castillo D, Sanchez- Jardón L, Araus JL. 2016. Physiological traits associated with wheat yield potential and performance under water-stress in a Mediterranean environment. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 987. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demura T, Ye ZH. 2010. Regulation of plant biomass production. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey DR, Lu K. 1959. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production 1. Agronomy Journal 51: 515–518. doi: 10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
   Google Scholar
• Dube E, Mare-Patose R, Kilian W, Barnard A, Tsilo TJ. 2016. Identifying high-yielding dryland wheat cultivars for the summer rainfall area of South Africa. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 33: 77–81. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2015.1061712
   Google Scholar
• Farshadfar E, Rafiee F, Hasheminasab H. 2013. Evaluation of genetic parameters of agronomic and morpho-physiological indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using diallel mating design. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7: 268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Farshadfar E, Rasoli V, Teixeira da Silva JA, Farshadfar M. 2011. Inheritance of drought tolerance indicators in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a diallel technique. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 870–878.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal K, Buchan G, Tonkin P. 1990. Estimation of field capacity and wilting point of some New Zealand soils from their saturation percentages. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 18: 241–246. doi: 10.1080/01140671.1990.10428101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hama SJ, Omer B, Rshead K. 2016. The simple correlation coefficient and path analysis of grain yield and its related components for some genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for two seasons in Iraqi Kurdistan. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 4: 68–70.
   Google Scholar
• Jamro SA, Rashid A. 2017. Significance of chemical priming on yield and yield components of wheat under drought stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences 8: 1339–1344. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2017.86090
   Google Scholar
• Kashif M, Khaliq I. 2004. Heritability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for some metric traits in wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6: 138–142.
   Google Scholar
• Khan A, Azam F, Ali A. 2010. Relationship of morphological traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred wheat lines grown under drought conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 259–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhar IM, Hussain M, Anwar J, Zulkiffal M, Iqbal MM, Khan BS, Khan AM, Qayyum A, Sabir W, Mehmood S. 2010. Correlation and path analysis for yield and yield contributing characters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agriculturae Serbica 15: 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mashilo J, Shimelis H, Odindo A. 2016. Correlation and path coefficient analyses of qualitative and quantitative traits in selected bottle gourd landraces. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil and Plant Science 66: 558–569.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew I, Shimelis H, Mwadzingeni L, Zengeni R, Mutema M, Chaplot V. 2018. Variance components and heritability of traits related to root: shoot biomass allocation and drought tolerance in wheat. Euphytica 214: 225. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2302-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller P, Williams J, Robinson H, Comstock R. 1958. Estimates of genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in upland cotton and their implications in selection 1. Agronomy Journal 50: 126–131. doi: 10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000030004x
   Google Scholar
• Mwadzingeni L, Shimelis H, Tesfay S, Tsilo TJ. 2016. Screening of bread wheat genotypes for drought tolerance using phenotypic and proline analyses. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mwadzingeni L, Shimelis H, Tsilo TJ. 2018. Combining ability and gene action controlling yield and yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought-stressed and nonstressed conditions. Plant Breeding 137: 502–513. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz F, Ahmad R, Ashraf M, Waraich E, Khan S. 2015. Effect of selenium foliar spray on physiological and biochemical processes and chemical constituents of wheat under drought stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 113: 191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okay S, Derelli E, Unver T. 2014. Transcriptome-wide identification of bread wheat WRKY transcription factors in response to drought stress. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 289: 765–781. doi: 10.1007/s00438-014-0849-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama LA, Federizzi LC, Barbosa Neto JF. 2004. Correlation and path analysis of yield and its components and plant traits in wheat. Ciência Rural 34: 1701–1708. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782004000600006
   Google Scholar
• Qin X, Zhang F, Liu C, Yu H, Cao B, Tian S, Liao Y, Siddique KH. 2015. Wheat yield improvements in China: past trends and future directions. Field Crops Research 177: 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards R, Hunt J, Kirkegaard J, Passioura J. 2014. Yield improvement and adaptation of wheat to water-limited environ- ments in Australia—a case study. Crop and Pasture Science 65: 676–689. doi: 10.1071/CP13426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolli E, Marasco R, Vigani G, Ettoumi B, Mapelli F, Deangelis, Gandolfi C, Casati E, Previtali F, Gerbino R. 2015. Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. Environmental Microbiology 17: 316–331. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem M. 2003. Response of durum and bread wheat genotypes to drought stress: biomass and yield components. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 290–293. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2003.290.293
   Google Scholar
• Semenov MA, Martre P, Jamieson PD. 2009. Quantifying effects of simple wheat traits on yield in water-limited environments using a modelling approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149: 1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Sain R, Sharma R. 2003. Genetics of spike length in durum wheat. Euphytica 130: 155–161. doi: 10.1023/A:1022814301871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, Lafitte HR, Archibald RL, Yang M, Hakimi SM, Mo H, Habben JE. 2017. ARGOS 8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15: 207–216. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S, Singh K, Patil RV, Kadam S, Bharti S, Prasad P, Singh NK, Khanna-Chopra R. 2015. Genomic regions associated with grain yield under drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 203: 449–467. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1314-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Savin R, Sadras VO. 2014. Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crops Research 157: 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuberosa R. 2012. Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Frontiers in Physiology 3: 347. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Chang X, Jing R. 2012. Genetic insight into yield-associated traits of wheat grown in multiple rain-fed environments. PLoS ONE 7: e31249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You MP, Rensing K, Renton M, Barbetti MJ. 2017. Modeling effects of temperature, soil, moisture, nutrition and variety as determinants of severity of Pythium damping-off and root disease in subterranean clover. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 2223. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar