Honeybush (Cyclopia spp.) anther-stigma distance and intraspecies cross compatibilities

References

• Arceo-Gómez G, Vargas CF, Parra-Tabla V. 2017. Selection on intra-individual variation in stigma–anther distance in the tropical tree Ipomoea wolcottiana (Convolvulaceae). Plant Biology 19(3): 454–459. doi: 10.1111/plb.12553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar B, Vieira J, Cunha AE, Vieira CP. 2015. No evidence for Fabaceae Gametophytic self-incompatibility being determined by Rosaceae, Solanaceae, and Plantaginaceae S-RNase lineage genes. BMC plant biology 15(1): 129. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0497-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bester C. 2013. A model for commercialisation of honeybush tea, an indigenous crop. Acta Horticulturae 1007: 889 −894. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1007.106
   Google Scholar
• Bester C, Joubert ME, Joubert E. 2016. A breeding strategy for South African indigenous herbal teas. Acta Horticulturae 1127: 15–22. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1127.3
   Google Scholar
• Bracci T, Busconi M, Fogher C, Sebastiani L. 2011. Molecular studies in olive (Olea europaea L.): overview on DNA markers applications and recent advances in genome analysis. Plant cell reports 30(4): 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0991-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewbaker JL. 1983. Systematics, self-incompatibility, breeding systems, and genetic improvement of Leucaena species. In: IDRC 1982. Proceedings of a workshop held in Singapore on Leucaena Research in the Asian Pacific Region; Nov 23–26; Ottawa (CA): International Development Research Centre. pp 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Caligari P, Campos H. 2014. Plant breeding. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Willey and sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso JCF, Viana ML, Matias R, Furtado MT, Caetano APDS, Consolaro H, Brito VLGD. 2018. Towards a unified terminology for angiosperm reproductive systems. Acta Botanica Brasilica 32(3): 329–348. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordoba SA, Cocucci AA. 2011. Flower power: Its association with bee power and floral functional morphology in papilionate legumes. Annals of Botany 108(5): 919–931. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafni A. 1992. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Eynsham, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dai WK, Kadiori EL, Wang QF, Yang CF. 2017. Pollen limitation, plasticity in floral traits, and mixed mating system in an alpine plant Pedicularis siphonantha (Orobanchaceae) from different altitudes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 55(3): 192–199. doi: 10.1111/jse.12240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas AC, Freyre R. 2015. Sexual compatibility between eight Nolana Lf (Solanaceae) species from Peru and Chile. Euphytica 208(1): 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1483-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadj-Arab H, Chèvre AM, Chable V. 2019. Plasticity of the self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica oleracea. Acta Hortic 1231: 109–114. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1231.19
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock SJ, Tabah DA. 2003. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1434): 1037–1045. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Tan DY. 2012. Variation in style length and anther-stigma distance in Ixiolirion songaricum (Amaryllidaceae). South African Journal of Botany 81: 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X.F, Zhu XF, Li QJ. 2018. Variation in the degree of reciprocal herkogamy affects the degree of legitimate pollination in a distylous species. AoB Plants 10(3): ply022. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John JA, Quenouille MH. 1977. Experiments: Design and Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Griffin & Company LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Keller B, Vos JM, Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Thomson JD, Conti E. 2016. Both morph- and species-dependent asymmetries affect reproductive barriers between heterostylous species. Ecology and Evolution 6(17): 6223–6244. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulbaba MW, Worley AC. 2008. Floral design in Polemonium brandegei (Polemoniaceae): genetic and phenotypic variation under hawkmoth and hummingbird pollination. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169(4): 509–522. doi: 10.1086/528751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levene H. 1960. Robust test in the equality of variance. In: Olkin I, (ed.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press; pp 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S-J, Wu L-Y, Huang S-Q. 2016. Shortened anther–stigma distance reduces compatible pollination in two distylous Primula species. Journal of Plant Ecology 9(2): 224–232. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtv049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro C, Dambruoso G, Bottalico G, Sabetta W. 2019. Self-incompatibility assessment of some Italian olive genotypes (Olea europaea L.) and cross-derived seedling selection by SSR markers on seed endosperms. Frontiers in Plant Science 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri J, Wendt T, Leles B, dos Santos MF, Palma-Silva C. 2017. Variation in reproductive systems facilitates species boundaries of sympatric Vriesea (Bromeliaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 184(2): 272–279. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/box026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemandt M, Roodt-Wilding R, Tobutt KR, Bester C. 2018. Microsatellite marker applications in Cyclopia (Fabaceae) species. South African Journal of Botany 116: 52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott RL, Longnecker M. 2001. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 5th ed. Duxbury (MA): Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen JL, Macdonald SE, Nielsen SE. 2016. Reproductive ecology of the distylous species Houstonia longifolia: implications for conservation of a rare species. Botany 94(10): 983–992. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2016-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratas MI, Aguiar B, Vieira J, Nunes V, Teixeira V, Fonseca NA, Iezzoni A, van Nocker S, Vieira CP. 2018. Inferences on specificity recognition at the Malus×domestica gametophytic self-incompatibility system. Scientific reports 8(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19820-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preedy VR. 2013. Tea in Health and Disease Prevention. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selak GV, Arbeiter AB, Perica S, Knap T, Klepo T, Bandelj D. 2018. An improved method for high-quality DNA extraction from olive embryos - plant tissue rich in polyphenols and polysaccharides. Poster session presented at: Olive management, biotechnology and authenticity of olive products. Olivebioteq’18: 6th International Conference on the Olive Tree and Olive Products; October 15–19; Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G. 2004. Plant systematics: an integrated approach. 2nd ed. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DC, Mehlenbacher SA. 1994. Use of Tyvek housewrap for pollination bags in breeding hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). HortScience 29(8): 918. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.29.8.918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SB, Collins G, Sedgley M. 2002. Sexual compatibility within and between olive cultivars. J. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 77(6): 665–673. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2002.11511554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar