Is application of commercial potassium humates beneficial to soil and wheat?

References

• American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2000. Approved methods AACC56-61A, AACC26-50, AACC39-11 and AACC56-40A (10th edn). St Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc.
   Google Scholar
• ARC-Small Grain Institute. 2020. Guideline: Production of small grains in the summer rainfall area. Bethlehem, South Africa: Agriculture Research Council – Small Grain.
   Google Scholar
• Arjumend T, Abassi MK, Rafique E. 2015. Effects of lignite-derived humic acid on some selected soil properties, growth and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47: 2231–2238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• As¸ik BB, Turan MA, Çelik H, Katkat AV. 2009. Effects of humic substances on plant growth and mineral nutrients uptake of wheat (Triticum durum cv. Salihli) under conditions of salinity. Asian Journal of Crop Science 1: 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bennie ATP, Coetzee MJ, van Antwerpen R, van Rensburg LD, Burger R du T. 1988. ‘n Waterbalansmodel vir besproeiing gebaseer op profielwatervoorsieningstempo en gewaswaterbehoeftes [A water-balance model for irrigation based on profile water supplying tempo and crop water requirements]. WRC report 144/1/88. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Burdick EM. 1965. Commercial humates for agriculture and the fertilizer industry. Economic Botany 19: 152–156.
   Google Scholar
• Canellas LP, Olivares FL. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 1: article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik H, Katkat AV, As¸ik BB, Turan A. 2008. Effects of soil applied humic substances to dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of maize under calcareous soil conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 54: 605–614.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, De Nobili M, Aviad T. 2004. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Magdoff F, Weil RR (eds). Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçsoy M, Sönmez F. 2019. The effect of potassium and humic acid applications on yield and nutrient contents of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. Delfii) with the same soil properties. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42: 2757–2772.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: Wiley Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helal AA, Murad GA, Helal AA. 2011. Characterization of different humic materials by various analytical techniques. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 4: 51–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintze JL. 1998. Number cruncher statistical system: NCSS 2000. Kaysville, Utah: NCSS.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Cereal Chemistry. 1995. Determination of the falling number according to Hagberg–Perten as a measure of the degree of alpha-amylase activity in grain and flour: ICC-standard No 107/1. Vienna, Austria: International Association for Cereal Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Iakimenko OS. 2005. Commercial humates from coal and their influence on soil properties and initial plant development. In: Perminova IV, Hatfield K, Hertkorn N (eds), Use of humic substances to remediate polluted environments: from theory to practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp 365–378,
   Google Scholar
• Karaca A, Turgay OC, Tamer N. 2006. Effects of a humic deposit (gyttja) on soil chemical and microbiological properties and heavy metal availability. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42: 585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katkat AV, Çelik H, Turan MA, As¸ik BB. 2009. Effect of soil and foliar applications of humic substances on dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of wheat under calcareous soil conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3: 1266–1273.
   Google Scholar
• King AE, Ali GA, Gillespie AW, Wagner-Riddle C. 2020. Soil organic matter as catalyst of crop response capture. Frontiers in Environmental Science 8: 50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levene H. 1990. Robust tests for the equality of variances. In: Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB (eds), Contributions to probability and statistics. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press. pp 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Little KR, Rose MT, Jackson WR, Cavagnaro TR, Patti AF. 2014. Do lignite-derived organic amendments improve early-stage pasture growth and key soil biological and physiochemical properties? Crop and Pasture Science 65: 899–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobartini JC, Tan KH, Rema JA, Gingle AR, Pape C, Himmelsbach DS. 1992. The geochemical nature and agricultural importance of commercial humic matter. Science of The Total Environment 113: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhi A, Fahir S, Iqbal Z, Mahmood A, Akhtar M, Qureshi TM et al. 2013. Characterization of commercial humic acid samples and impact on growth of fungi and plants. Soil Environment 32: 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons G, Genc Y, 2016. Commercial humates in agriculture: real substance or smoke and mirrors? Agronomy (Basel) 6: article 50.
   Google Scholar
• Manal FM, Thalooth AT, Amal GA, Magda HM, Elewa TA. 2016. Evaluation of the effect of chemical fertilizer and humic acid on yield and yield components of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum) grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. International Journal of ChemTech Research 9: 154–161.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew L. 2004. Humic substances in biological agriculture. Acres 34: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelson RL. 2005. Humic materials for agriculture. Better Crops with Plant Food 89: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 1527–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Schiavon M, Ertani A. 2016. Plant biostimulants: physiology responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Scientia Agricola 73: 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Non-affiliated Soil Analysis Work Committee. 1990. Handbook of standard soil testing methods for advisory purposes. Pretoria, South Africa: Soil Science Society of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Ouni Y, Ghnaya T, Montemurro F, Abdelly C, Lakhdar A. 2014. The role of humic substances in mitigating the harmful effects of soil salinity and improving plant productivity. International Journal of Plant Production 8: 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson D. 1994. Filamentous fungi. In: Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum A (eds), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison, Wisconsin, Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Méndez EM, Havel J, Patocka J. 2005. Humic substances — compounds of still unknown structure: applications in agriculture, industry, environment and biomedicine. Journal of Applied Biomedicine 3: 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Powlson DS, Smith P, De Nobili M. 2013. Soil organic matter. In: Gregory PJ, Northcliff S (eds), Soil conditions and plant growth. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Rowse HR, Phillips DA. 1974. An instrument for estimating the total length of root on a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson FJ, Cole MA. 1999. Cycles of soils: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, micronutrients (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir mm, Khurshid M, Khan MZ, Abbasi MK, Kazmi MH. 2011. Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere 21: 124–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsal T, Ok SS. 2001. Description of characteristics of humic substances from different waste materials. Bioresource Technology 78: 239–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil RR, Brady NC. 2017. The nature and properties of soils (15th edn). London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Willardson LS, Oosthuis DM, Johnson DA. 1987. Sprinkler selection for line-source irrigation systems. Irrigation Science 8: 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberer DA. 1994. Recovery and enumeration of viable bacteria. In: Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum A (eds), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties. Madison, Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar