Tense and aspect of performatives in isiXhosa

References

• Andrason A. 2012. Making it sound – Performative qatal and its explanation. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 12(8): 1–58. https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2011.v12.a8
   Google Scholar
• Andrason A. 2013. El sistema verbal hebreo en su contexto semítico: Una visión dinámica. Estella: Verbo divino.
   Google Scholar
• Andrason A. 2016. A complex system of complex predicates: Tense, Taxis, Aspect and Mood in Basse Mandinka from a grammaticalisation and cognitive perspective. PhD thesis. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Austin JL. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bary C. 2007. The tragic Aorist revisited. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Bary C. 2009. Aspect in Ancient Greek. A semantic analysis of the aorist and imperfective. PhD thesis. Radboud Universiteit, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Bertinetto PM. 2001. On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The ‘perfective-telic confusion’ In: Cecchetto C, Chierchia G, Guasti MT (eds), Semantic interfaces. Stanford: CSLI Publications. pp. 177–210.
   Google Scholar
• Bertinetto PM, Lenci A. 2010. Iterativity vs. habituality (and gnomic imperfectivity). Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 9(1): 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz W. 2009. Englische Pragmatik – Eine Einführung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee J. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee J, Perkins R, Pagliuca W. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie B. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E. 2008. Performative sentences and the morphosyntax-semantics interface in archaic Vedic. Journal of South Asian Literature 1(1): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl E. 2010. Time, tense and aspect in early Vedic grammar. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004178144.i-475.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl Ö. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl Ö. 2000. The tense and aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. In: Dahl Ö (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan F. 2010. Building a semantic map: Top-down versus bottom-up approaches. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.347.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan F. 2011. Typology of tense, aspect, and modality systems. In: Song JJ (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 445–464.
   Google Scholar
• Depraetere I, Reed S. 2000. The present perfect progressive: Constraints on its use with numerical object NPs. English Language and Linguistics 4(1): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000150.
   Google Scholar
• Detges U. 2004. How cognitive is grammaticalization? The history of the Catalan perfect perfràstic. In: Fischer O, Norde M, Perridon H (eds), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalizatoin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.11det.
   Google Scholar
• Dlali, M. 2001. Politeness theory and requests in Xhosa. PhD thesis. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis JA. 1978. IsiXhosa 4. Parow: Oudiovista.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis JA, Visser M. 1992. Xhosa Syntax. Pretoria: Via Afrika.
   Google Scholar
• Francis AL, Tatum HF. 1919. An advanced Latin syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaugh D. 1995. Some problems for politeness theory: Deference and directness in Xhosa performative requests. South African Journal of African Languages 15(3): 123–125.
   Google Scholar
• Greenough JB, Kittredge GL, Howard AA, D’Ooge BL. 1903/1983. Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar. New Rochelle: Aristide D. Caratzas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Grevisse M. 1975. Le bon usage. Gembloux: Duculot.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath M. 1998. The semantic development of old presents: New futures and subjunctives without grammaticalization. Diachronica 15(1): 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.15.1.03has.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning, semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In: Tomasello M (ed.), The new psychology of language. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 211–242.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath M. 2004. Coordinating constructions: An overview. In: Haspelmath M (ed.), Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.03has.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Claudi U, Hünnemeyer F. 1991. Grammaticalization. A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Kuteva T. 2007 The Genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Kuteva T. 2010. Contact and grammaticalization. In: Hickey R (ed.), The handbook of language contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper P, Traugott E. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525.
   Google Scholar
• Huehnergard J. 2005. A grammar of Akkadian. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan AC. 1966. A practical course in Xhosa. Johannesburg: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Kienast B. 2001. Historische semitische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky P. 2002. Event structure and the perfect. In: Beaver D, Casillas Martínez L, Clark B, Kaufmann S (eds), The construction of meaning. Stanford: CSLI Publications. pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kuryłowicz J. 1975. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses Linguistiques 2: 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker RW. 2003. Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. In: Cuyckens H, Berg T, Driven R, Panther KU (eds), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.05lan.
   Google Scholar
• Loesov S. 2004. T-perfect in Old Babylonian: The debate and a thesis. In: Kogan L (ed.), Babel & Bibel 1. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. pp. 83–181.
   Google Scholar
• Loesov S. 2005. Akkadian sentences about the present time - Part One. In: Kogan L (ed.), Babel & Bibel 2: Memoriae Igor M. Diakonof. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. pp. 101–148.
   Google Scholar
• Marchese L. 1986. Tense/aspect and the development of auxiliaries in the Kru language family. Arlington: SIL.
   Google Scholar
• Maslov J. 1988. Resultative, perfect and aspect. In: Nedjalkov V (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.07mas.
   Google Scholar
• Mauger G. 1968. Grammaire pratique du français d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• McCawley J. 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In: Fillmore C, Langendoen DT (eds), Studies in linguistics and semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Meeuwis M, De Wit A, Brisard F. 2015. ‘Performatives and (im) perfective aspect’. Abstracts of the 15th International Pragmatics Conference. Antwerp, Belgium. 26–31 July 2015. p. 572.
   Google Scholar
• Narrog H, van der Auwera J. 2011. Grammaticalization and semantic maps. In: Narrog H, Heine B (eds), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Nedjalkov V. 1988. Resultative, passive, and perfect in German. In: Nedjalkov V (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.29ned.
   Google Scholar
• Nedjalkov V. 2001. Resultative constructions. In: Haspelmath M, König E, Oesterreicher W, Raible W (eds), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 928–940.
   Google Scholar
• Nedjalkov V, Jaxontov S. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In: Nedjalkov V (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 3–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned.
   Google Scholar
• New Revised Standard Version. The Holy Bible. 1989. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse D. 2008. Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter TS. 2008. P. Lips. inv. 250 and 260: Two 10th/11th-century Coptic texts. The Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 45: 209–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogland M. 2003. Alleged non-past uses of Qatal in classical Hebrew. Studia Semitica Neerlandica. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenter S. 1994. The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language 18: 71–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle JR. 1969. Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438.
   Google Scholar
• Searle JR. 1971/1976. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Trier: L.A.U.T.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth HW. 1956. A Greek grammar for colleges (Revised Edition by Gordon Messing). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squartini M, Bertinetto PM. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In: Dahl Ö (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 403–440.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J. 1995. Meaning in interaction – An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott E, Dasher R. 2004. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visser M. 2005. Xhosa. In: Brown K (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 705–716.
   Google Scholar
• Visser M. 2015. ‘Xhosa Syntax’. Unpublished manuscript. Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Volodin A. 1988. Resultative and perfect passive in Finnish. In: Nedjalkov V (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.32vol.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger S. 2000. On performatives in classical Ethiopic. Journal of Semitic Studies 45: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/45.1.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werning D. 2008. Aspect vs. relative tense, and the typological classification of the Ancient Egyptian sdm.n = f. Lingua Aegyptia 16: 261–292.
   Google Scholar
• Wright W. 1964. A grammar of the Arabic language. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwarts J. 2010. Semantic map geometry: Two approcahes. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.357
   Google Scholar