Quantitative analysis of Sesotho sa Leboa part-of-speech taggers

References

• Akbik A, Blythe D, Vollgraf R. 2018. Contextual string embeddings for sequence labeling. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 20–26 August, Santa Fe, New Mexico. pp. 1638–1649.
   Google Scholar
• Amrullah AZ, Hartanto R, Mustika IW. 2017. A comparison of different part-of-speech tagging techniques for text in Bahasa Indonesia. Proceedings of the 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar, 1–2 August, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/INAES.2017.8068538
   Google Scholar
• Anbananthen KSM, Krishnan JK, Sayeed MS, Muniapan P. 2017. Comparison of stochastic and rule-based POS tagging on Malay online text. American Journal of Applied Sciences 14(9): 843–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.843.851
   Google Scholar
• Babych B, Sharoff S. 2016. Ukrainian part-of-speech tagger for hybrid MT: Rapid induction of morphological disambiguation resources from a closely related language. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Hybrid Approaches to Translation (HyTra). European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), 1 June, Riga, Latvia.
   Google Scholar
• Bahcevan CA, Kutlu E, Yildiz T. 2018. Deep neural network architecture for part-of-speech tagging for Turkish language. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), 20–23 September, Sarajevo. pp. 235–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK.2018.8566272
   Google Scholar
• Barnard E, Davel M, Van Heerden C, de Wet F, Badenhorst J. 2014. The NCHLT speech corpus of the South African languages. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-Resourced Languages (SLTU), 14–16 May, St Petersburg, Russia. pp. 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet B, McDonald R, Simoes G, Andor D, Pitler E, Maynez J. 2018. Morphosyntactic tagging with a Meta-BiLSTM model over context sensitive token encodings. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 15–20 July, Melbourne, Australia. pp. 2642–2652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1246
   Google Scholar
• Choi JD. 2016. Dynamic feature induction: The last gist to the state-of-the-art. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 12–17 June, San Diego, California. pp. 271–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1031
   Google Scholar
• Denis P, Sagot B. 2012. Coupling an annotated corpus and a lexicon for state-of-the-art POS tagging. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(4): 721–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-012-9193-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schryver GM, De Pauw GD. 2007. Dictionary Writing System (DWS) + Corpus Query Package (CQP): The case of TshwaneLex. Lexikos 17: 226–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5788/17-0-554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit JS. 2017. A comparative evaluation of open-source part-of-speech taggers for South African languages. Honours thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Eiselen R, Puttkammer MJ. 2014. Developing text resources for ten South African languages. Language Resource and Evaluation Conference, 26–31 May, Reykjavik, Iceland. pp. 3698–3703.
   Google Scholar
• Eiselen ER, Puttkammer MJ, Hocking J, Kruger A. 2018. CTexTools 2.1.0. SADiLaR resource catalogue [distributor]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12185/480
   Google Scholar
• Faaβ G, Heid U, Taljard E, Prinsloo DJ. 2009. Part-of-speech tagging of Northern Sotho: Disambiguating polysemous function words. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Language Technologies for African Languages, 31 March, Athens, Greece. pp. 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Garrette D, Mielens J, Baldridge J. 2013. Real-world semi-supervised learning of POS-taggers for low-resource languages. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4–9 August, Sofia, Bulgaria. pp. 583–592.
   Google Scholar
• Givón T. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In: Li CN (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. pp. 149–188.
   Google Scholar
• Halácsy P, Kornai A, Oravecz C. 2007. HunPos: An Open Source Trigram Tagger. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, 25–27 June, Prague, Czech Republic. pp. 209–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3115/1557769.1557830
   Google Scholar
• Heid U, Taljard E, Prinsloo DJ. 2006. Grammar-based tools for the creation of tagging resources for an unresourced language: the case of Northern Sotho. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 24–26 May, Genoa, Italy. pp. 2235–2240.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky D, Martin JH. 2009. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Hoboken: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koleva M. 2013. Towards adaptation of NLP tools for closely related Bantu languages: Building a part-of-speech tagger for Zulu. PhD thesis, Saarland University, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kurniawan K, Aji AF. 2018. Toward a standardized and more accurate Indonesian part-of-speech tagging. Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Asian Language Processing, 15–18 November, Bandung, Indonesia. pp. 303–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP.2018.8629236
   Google Scholar
• Ling W, Dyer C, Black AW, Trancoso I, Fermandez R, Amir S, Marujo L, Luís T. 2015. Finding function in form: Compositional character models for open vocabulary word representation. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, September, Lisbon, Portugal. pp. 1520–1530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1176
   Google Scholar
• Lombard DP. 1985. Introduction to the grammar of Northern Sotho. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Lu X. 2014. Computational Methods for Corpus Annotation and Analysis. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8645-4
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Hovy E. 2016. End-to-end sequence labeling via bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF. http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01354
   Google Scholar
• Malema G, Okgetheng B, Motlhanka M. 2017. Setswana part-of-speech tagging. International Journal on Natural Language Computing 6(6): 15–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnlc.2017.6602
   Google Scholar
• Nasiruddin M. 2013. A state of the art of word sense induction: A way towards word sense disambiguation for under-resourced languages. http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1425
   Google Scholar
• Petrochenkov VV, Kazennikov AO. 2013. A statistical tagger for morphological tagging of Russian language texts. Automation and Remote Control 74(10): 1724–1732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117913100123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos G, Louwrens L J. 1994. A linguistic analysis of Northern Sotho. Pretoria: Via Afrika.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsloo DJ, Faaβ G, Taljard E, Heid U. 2008. Designing a verb guesser for part of speech tagging in Northern Sotho. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 26(2): 185–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2008.26.2.1.565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttkammer MJ, Schlemmer M. 2014. NCHLT Part-of-speech taggers. 1.0. SADiLaR resource catalogue [distributor]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12185/323
   Google Scholar
• Puttkammer MJ, Schlemmer M, Bekker R. 2014. NCHLT Sepedi annotated text corpora. SADiLaR resource catalogue [distributor]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12185/325
   Google Scholar
• Taljard E, De Schryver GM. 2016. A corpus-driven account of the noun classes and genders in Northern Sotho. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 34(2): 169–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2016.1206478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taljard E, Faaß G, Heid U, Prinsloo D.J. 2008. On the development of a tagset for Northern Sotho with special reference to the issue of standardisation. Literator 29(1): 111–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v29i1.103
   Google Scholar
• Tasharofi S, Raja F, Oroumchian F, Rahgozar M. 2007. Evaluation of statistical part of speech tagging of persian text. The 9th International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, 1–4 February, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.2007.4555312
   Google Scholar
• Tseng H, Jurafsky D, Manning C. 2005. Morphological features help POS tagging of unknown words across language varieties. Proceedings of the Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, 14–15 October, Jeju Island, Korea. pp. 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wilken I, Gumede T, Moors C, Calteaux K. 2018. Human language technology audit 2018: Design considerations and methodology. Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, 1–7 December, Plaine Magnien, Mauritius. pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601212
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooy B, Pretorius R. 2003. A word-class tagset for Setswana. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 21(4): 203–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610309486344
   Google Scholar
• Zerbian S. 2006. Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho. PhD thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar