Semantic features in English print advertisements: a Xitsonga translation perspective

References

• Achen JE. 2012. A pragmatic analysis of selected signboard adverts in Nigeria. International Journal of Arts and Humanities 1(3): 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Andriunaité I, Liubiniené V. 2006. Translation and adaptation of advertisements – linguistic and socio-cultural problems.
   Google Scholar
• Ashipu KBC. 2009. A rhetorical analysis of selected editorials of Newswatch and Tell Magazines Oniong. A Contemporary Journal of Inter-Disciplinary Studies 1(1): 106–122.
   Google Scholar
• Baker M. 1992. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation, 2nd Ed. [Revised edition 2011]. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker M. 1999. The role of corpora in investigating the linguistic behaviour of professional translators. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.05bak.
   Google Scholar
• Baumbach EJM. 1987. Analytical Tsonga Grammar. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Bell RT. 1991. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chabata E. 2008. Language and development: Progress and challenges in a multilingual Zimbabwe. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 26(1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2008.26.1.2.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesterman A, Wagner E. 2002. Can Theory Help Translators? Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coker O, Oke R.S. 2012. Arts for Ad Sake”: “Advertising Language as Literary Language in Selected Advertising copy in Nigeria”. In The African symposium: an online journal of the African educational research. Volume 12, No. 2, December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cook G. 2012. The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cruse A. 2004. Meaning and Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dada SA. 2013. Style-rhetorical device in pidgin English advertisement in Nigeria. Research Journal of English Language and Literature 1(1): 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Doke CM. 1954. The Southern Bantu languages. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza A. 2009. Advertising and Promotions: An IMC Perspective. New York: McGraw hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Egudu RN. 1985. The Study of Poetry. Ibadan: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard A. 2002. The language of advertising. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard C, ed. 2008. Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.102
   Google Scholar
• Hermans T. 1991. Translational norms and correct translations. In: Van Leuven-Zwart K, Naaukens T (eds), Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings of the First James Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Jaaskelainen R. 1999. Tapping the process: an explorative study of cognitive and effective factors involved in translating. Joensuu: University of Joensuu Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jarniewicz J. 2000. Mayo. The Iowa Review, 30(2).
   Google Scholar
• Kazmi Shh, Batra S. 2008. Advertising and Sales Promotion. Kerala: Excel Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krings HP. 1986. Translation problems and translation strategies of advanced German learners of French (L2). In: House J, Blum-Kulka S (eds), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Tubingen: Gunter Narr. pp. 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Laviosa S. 2008. Description in the translation classroom. Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies, pp.119-132.
   Google Scholar
• Leech G. 2006. English in Advertising. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Loescher W. 1991. Translation performance, translation process and translation strategies. Tuebingen: Guten Narr.
   Google Scholar
• Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English – New Edition For Advanced Learners. 2009. ‘Trope’. Pearson Education Limited: England.
   Google Scholar
• Mathumba I. 1993. A comparative study of selected phonetic, phonological and lexical aspects of some major dialects of Tsonga in the Republic of South Africa, and their impact of the standard language. PhD thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Munday J. 2008. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy SN. 2007. Advertising: An IMC Perspective. Kerala: Excel Books.
   Google Scholar
• Newmark P. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson HP, Nielson F. 1995. Semantic with Applications: A Formal Introduction. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nord C. 1991. Skopos, loyalty, and translational conventions. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies. 1991 Jan 1;3(1):91-109.
   Google Scholar
• Nord C. 1997. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nord C. 2001. Loyalty revised: Bible translation as a case in point. The Translator 7(2): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2001.10799100
   Google Scholar
• Nord C. 2005. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis. 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Rodop.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi H. 2012. Journalism and Mass Communication. Agra: Upkar Prakashan.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska-Kasztelanic A. 2000. A study of the lexico-semantic and grammatical influence of English on the Polish of the younger generation of Poles (19–35 years of age). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie DIALOG.
   Google Scholar
• Paul M. 1997. Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Parameswaran MG. 2001. Brand Building advertising: concepts and cases. New York: McGraw hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pollay R. 1984. The identification and distribution of values manifest in print media advertising 1900–1980. In: Pitts RE, Woodside AG (eds), Personal Values and Consumer Psychology. Lexington: Lexington Press. pp. 11–129.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K. 2004. Type, kind and individuality of text: decision-making in translation. In: Venuti L (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge. pp. 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss K, Vermeer H. 1984. (Revised edition in 2014). Towards a General Theory of Translational Action Skopos Theory Explained. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, JC. and TG Williams. 1990. Consumer personal values as antecedents to dyadic and third-party public consumer complaining behavior: an exploratory study. The Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 3, pp.71-81.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez CV. 1996. The role of translation in the production of advertisements. In: Fernández-corugedo SG (ed.), Some Sundry Wits Gathered Together. A Coruña: Universidade da coruña. pp. 221–226. http://hdl.handle.net/2183/9533
   Google Scholar
• Shah K. 2009. Advertising and Promotions: An IMC Perspective. Kerala Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S. 2009. Advertising Planning and Implementation. New Delhi: PhI.
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Hornby M. 1995. Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Hornby M. 2000. Communicating in the global village: on language, translation and cultural identity. In: Schaffner C (ed.), Translation in the Global Village. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. pp. 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Snell-Hornby M. 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies: New Paradigms or Shifting Viewpoints? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.66
   Google Scholar
• Storto A, Biondo FP. 2016. The mobility between languages and the fluxes of globalization: reviewing paradigms, transcending paradoxes. Revista da Anpoll 40: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Toury G. 1980. The nature and role of norms in literary translation. In: Toury G (ed.), In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. pp. 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Toury G. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. 1987. What does it mean to translate? Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(2): 2533.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. 1990. Skopos and commission in translational action. In: Chesterman A. (ed.), Readings in Translation Theory. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab. pp. 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. 1994. Translation today: Old and new problems. In: M. Snell-hornby, F. Pochhacker, K. Kainel (Eds.) Translation studies: an inter-discipline.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. 1996. A Skopos Theory of Translation (Some arguments for and against). heidelberg: TextconText Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. 1998. Starting to unask what translatology is about. Target 10(1): 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.10.1.03ver
   Google Scholar
• Vermeer HJ. and Chesterman, A., 2021. Skopos and commission in translational action. In The translation studies reader (pp. 219-230). Routledge.
   Google Scholar