References
- Caputo, J. 1983. ‘The thought of being and the conversation of mankind: the case of Heidegger and Rorty’, Review of Metaphysics 36, 661–685.
- Ginev, D. 1999. ‘From a strong hermeneutics of science to a strong rhetoric of science’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 32(3), 247–281.
- Ginev, D. 2011. The Tenets of Cognitive Existentialism. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
- Ginev, D. 2012. ‘Two accounts of the hermeneutic fore-structure of scientific research’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26(4), 423–445. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2012.748498
- Guignon, C. 1986. ‘On saving Heidegger from Rorty’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46(3), 401–417. doi: 10.2307/2107312
- Heelan, P. 1983. ‘Natural science as hermeneutic of instrumentation’, Philosophy of Science 50(2), 181–204. doi: 10.1086/289105
- Heidegger, H. 1927/1962. Being and Time, transl. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. San Francisco: Harper.
- Kockelmans, J. 1986. ‘On the hermeneutic dimension of the natural sciences’, Etudes Phénoménologique 3, 33–81.
- Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Rorty, R. 1981. ‘Nineteenth-century idealism and twentieth-century textualism’, Monist 64(2), 155–174. doi: 10.5840/monist198164211
- Rorty, R. 1985. ‘Texts and lumps’, New Literary History 17(1), 1–15. doi: 10.2307/468973
- Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Rorty, R. 1991. ‘Inquiry as recontextualization: an anti-dualist account of interpretation’, in Hiley, D, Bohman, J. & Shusterman, R. (eds), The Interpretive Turn. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 59–80.
- Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books.
- Weinberg, S. 1996. ‘Sokal's hoax’, New York Review of Books, 43(13), 11–15.