Biomedical enhancement and the pursuit of mastery and perfection: a critique of the views of Michael Sandel

References

• Agar, N. 2010. Humanity's End. Cambridge, Massachusetts.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 2005. ‘A history of transhumanist thought’, Journal of Evolution and Technology 14(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, N. 2008. ‘Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up’, in Gordijn, B., Chadwick, R. (eds), Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 107–137.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. 2011. Beyond Humanity? The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, N. 2009. ‘Can anyone really be talking about ethically modifying human nature?’, in Savulescu, J., Bostrom, N. (eds), Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. 1971. The Origin of Species (intro. L. Harrison Matthews; first published in this edition in 1928). London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Degenaar, J.J. 1979. ‘Some philosophical considerations on pain’, Pain 7(3), 281–304. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90085-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degenaar, J.J. 1982. ‘Filosofiese besinning oor pyn’, South African Journal of Philosophy 1(2), 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• de Grey, A. 2007. Ending Aging: the Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Grey, A. 2008. ‘Reasons and methods for promoting our duty to extend healthy life indefinitely’, Journal of Evolution and Technology 18(1), 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• de Grey, A. 2011. ‘SENS statement of principle’, in Hansell, G.R., Grassie, W. (eds), H±: Transhumanism and its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus Institute, pp. 67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2004. ‘Transhumanism’, Foreign Policy 144(September/October), 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, L. 2011. ‘2045: the year man becomes immortal’, Time, 10 February. Available at http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2048299,00.html [accessed 25 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 1998. Clones, Genes and Immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtug, N. 1998. ‘Creating and patenting new life forms’, in Kuhse, H., Singer, P. (eds), A Companion to Bioethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm, F. 2009. ‘What is and is not wrong with enhancement?’, in Savulescu, J., Bostrom, N. (eds), Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, L.R. 2002. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: the Challenge for Bioethics. New York: Encounter Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, L.R. 2007. ‘Defending human dignity’, Commentary 124(5), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2001a. The Law of Accelerating Returns. Available at http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns [accessed 10 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2001b. The Coming Merging of Mind and Machine. Available at http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0063.html [accessed 3 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2002. After the Singularity: a Talk with Ray Kurzweil. Available at http://kurzweilai.net/articles/art0451.html [accessed 3 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, G., Pettit, P. 1981. Semantics and Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Palk, A. 2014. ‘The morality of transhumanism: assessing dignity arguments’, MA thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. 2004. ‘The case against perfection’, The Atlantic Monthly April 2004, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M.J. 2007. The Case against Perfection. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M.J. 2009. Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J. 2009. ‘The human prejudice and the moral status of enhanced being: what do we owe the gods?’, in Savulescu, J. & Bostrom, N. (eds), Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–250.
   Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J., Bostrom, N. (Eds.), 2009. Human Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarry, E. 1985. The Body in Pain: the Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tirosh-Samuelson, H. 2011. ‘Engaging transhumanism’, in Hansell, G.R., Grassie, W. (eds), H±: Transhumanism and its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus Institute, pp. 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk, A.A. 2012. ‘Biomediese verbetering: maakbaarheid of onttowering?’, Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 52(4), 581–595.
   Google Scholar