Against overgeneralisation objections to the argument from moral disagreement

References

• Blackburn, S. 2000. Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. 1988. “How to be a moral realist.” In: Essays on Moral Realism, edited by G. Sayre-McCord, 181–228. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, D. O. 1984. “Moral realism and the sceptical arguments from disagreement and queerness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (2): 111–125. doi:10.1080/00048408412341311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, D. O. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511624612
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, C. 2018. “Companions in guilt arguments.” Philosophy Compass 13 (11): e12528. doi:10.1111/phc3.12528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowie, C. and R. Rowland, eds. 2019. Companions in Guilt Arguments in Metaethics. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429454677
   Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. and A. A. Plakias. 2008. “How to argue about disagreement: Evaluative diversity and moral realism.” In: Moral Psychology, Vol.2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong, 303–331. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. 2009. “How is moral disagreement a problem for realism?” Journal of Ethics 13 (1): 15–50. doi:10.1007/s10892-008-9041-z
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S. 2014. “Moral realism, moral disagreement, and moral psychology.” Philosophical Papers 43 (2): 161–190. doi:10.1080/05568641.2014.932953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowans, C. W. 2000. “Introduction: debates about moral disagreements.” In: Moral Disagreements: Classic and Contemporary Readings, edited by C. W. Gowans, 1–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H. 1968. “Enumerative induction as inference to the best explanation.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (18): 529–533. doi:10.2307/2024115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H. 1977. The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H. 1986. “Moral explanations of natural facts – Can moral claims be tested against moral reality?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (S1): 57–68. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb01596.x
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 1996. “Moral relativism.” In: Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity, edited by G. Harman and J. J. Thompson, 1–64. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. H. 2010. “Reply to Leiter.” On the Human. http://onthehuman.org/2010/03/moral-skepticism-and-moral-disagreement-developing-an-argument-from-nietzsche/
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, R. 2007. “Moral anti-realism.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-anti-realism/
   Google Scholar
• Kölbel, M. 2004. “Faultless disagreement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1): 53–73. doi:10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.x
   Google Scholar
• Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and Its Place in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199246319.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, B. 2009. “Moral skepticism and moral disagreement in Nietzsche.” University of Chicago Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 257. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1315061
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, B. 2010a. “Moral skepticism and moral disagreement: Developing an argument from Nietzsche.” On the Human. http://onthehuman.org/2010/03/moral-skepticism-and-moral-disagreement-developing-an-argument-from-nietzsche/
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, B. 2010b. “Reply to comments, part I.” On the Human. http://onthehuman.org/2010/03/moral-skepticism-and-moral-disagreement-developing-an-argument-from-nietzsche/
   Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. 2004. “Review of Russ Shafer-Landau: Moral Realism: A Defense.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23768-moral-realism-a-defense/
   Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. 2007. Companions in Guilt: Arguments for Ethical Objectivity. London: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/9780230590380
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, D. 1998. “Moral realism and the argument from disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 90 (3): 281–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, D. 2007. “The argument from moral experience.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5): 469–484.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1977) 2011. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. D. 2013. “Defending moral realism from empirical evidence of disagreement.” Social Theory and Practice 39 (3): 373–396. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201339322
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. 2009. “The conditions of moral realism.” Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 123–155. doi:10.5840/jpr_2009_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. 2011. “The philosophical insignificance of a priori knowledge.” In: New Essays on the A Priori, edited by M. Shaffer and M. V. Veber, 117–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PhilPapers. 2012. The PhilPapers Surveys: Preliminary Survey Results. http://philpapers.org/surveys/results.pl
   Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. R. 2010. “The argument from relativity: The Nietzsche/Leiter version.” On the Human. http://onthehuman.org/2010/03/moral-skepticism-and-moral-disagreement-developing-an-argument-from-nietzsche/
   Google Scholar
• Plakias, A. A. 2011. The Good and the Gross: Essays in Metaethics and Moral Psychology. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Pölzler, T. 2018. Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315145211
   Google Scholar
• Pölzler, T., and J. C. Wright. 2020. “Anti-realist pluralism: A new approach for folk metaethics.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (1): 53–82. doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00447-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Railton, P. 1986. “Facts and values.” Philosophical Topics 14 (2): 5–31. doi:10.5840/philtopics19861421
   Google Scholar
• Sayre-McCord, G. 1988. “The many moral realisms.” In: Essays on Moral Realism, edited by G. Sayre-McCord, 1–26. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., and F. Cushman. 2015. “Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise, and reflection.” Cognition 141:127–137. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., and J. Ellis. 2017. “Rationalization in moral and philosophical thought.” In: Moral Inferences, edited by J-F. Bonnefon and B. Trémolière, 170–190. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Empiricus, S. 2000. “Outlines of skepticism.” In: Moral Disagreements: Classic and Contemporary Readings, edited by C. W. Gowans, 47–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, R. 2003. Moral Realism: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199259755.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, R. 2006. “Ethics as philosophy: A defense of ethical nonnaturalism.” In: Metaethics After Moore, edited by T. Horgan and M. Timmons, 209–232. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, R. 2012. “Evolutionary debunking, moral realism, and moral knowledge.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (1): 1–37. doi:10.26556/jesp.v7i1.68
   Google Scholar
• Sneddon, A. 2009. “Normative ethics and the prospects of an empirical contribution to assessment of moral disagreement and moral realism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4): 447–455. doi:10.1007/s10790-009-9164-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, C. 2004. Moral Reality. A Defense of Moral Realism. PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Tersman, F. 2006. Moral Disagreement. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511570599
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. R. 1978. “The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice.” Journal of Philosophy 75 (2): 76–92. doi:10.2307/2025686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, R. 2010. “Leiter’s Nietzschean argument for moral scepticism.” On the Human. http://onthehuman.org/2010/03/moral-skepticism-and-moral-disagreement-developing-an-argument-from-nietzsche/
   Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, R. 2014. “Moral disagreement among philosophers.” In: Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution, edited by M. Bergmann and P. Kain, 23–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669776.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Wolchover, N. 2016. “A fight for the soul of science.” Quanta Magazine 16 December 2015. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151216-physicists-and-philosophers-debate-the-boundaries-of-science/
   Google Scholar