- See ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1995 Term’ (1996) 12 SAJHR 39; ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1996 Term’ (1997) 13 SAJHR 208; ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1997 Term’ (1998) 14 SAJHR 277; ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1998 Term’ (1999) 15 SAJHR 256, read with (1999) 15 SAJHR 446; ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1999 Term’ (2000) 16 SAJHR 364.
- The concurrence between Ackerman J and Madala J was lower at 75 per cent, but was excluded because they only sat together for four cases.
- For the purposes of these statistics, the main judgment delivered by the Court and the interim order made on 21 September 2000 (CCT 38/00) have been considered as one judgment.
- Pr will be dealt with under the 2000 statistics as a case concerned primarily with the issue of evidence. The 2001 case concerning freedom of religion will be included in the statistics for 2001.
- The judgment for Le was given by a unanimous court, with no indication from the written reasons as to which judges were present. All judges have thus been marked as concurring.
- For the purposes of these statistics, the main issue which the Court addresses is taken to be the constitutionality of s 18(4)(f) of the Child Care Act.
- The subject matter for Pr has been taken as the reasons given by the Court for ordering that further evidence be adduced.
- Note that the jurisdictional basis for S v Dzukuda was a referral for confirmation of an order of invalidity by a High Court, and the jurisdictional basis for S v Tshilo was an application for leave to appeal against a High Court decision. For the purposes of these statistics, only the former has been recorded.
Free access
Constitutional Court Statistics for the 2000 Term
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.