Reconciling competing claims to justice in urban South Africa: Cato Manor and District Six

References

• Beall, Jo, and Alison Todes. 2004. “Gender and Integrated Area Development Projects: Lessons from Cato Manor, Durban.” Cities 21 (4): 301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, Christiaan. 2007. “Mobilizing ‘Community’ for Justice in District Six: Stakeholder Politics Early in the Land Restitution Process.” South African Historical Journal 58: 253–276. doi: 10.1080/02582470709464752
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Christiaan. 2010. “Acrimonious Stakeholder Politics.” In Land, Memory, Reconstruction and Justice: Perspectives on Land Restitution in South Africa, edited by Anna Bohlin, Ruth Hall, Thembela Kepe, and Cherryl Walker, 143–162. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Christiaan. 2013. “Does Urban Land Restitution Contribute to Transformation in South Africa? Development and Social Citizenship Struggle.” Development and Change 44 (4): 965–989. doi: 10.1111/dech.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, Brendan. 2003. “Linking Land Restitution and Urban Development: Lessons for Restructuring the Apartheid City from the Kipi Land Claim, Durban Metropolitan Area.” Masters thesis, University of Natal.
   Google Scholar
• CMDA (Cato Manor Development Association). 2002. Annual Report. Accessed July 21. http://www.cmda.org.za/annual_report_02/cycle.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, Derick, and Deborah James. 2009. “‘Restoring What Was Ours’: An Introduction.” In The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: ‘Restoring what was ours’, 1–24. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, Clive. 2004. “Achievements of the Cato Manor Development Project: Extracts from the Cato Manor Development Project Review, 1994–2002.” In Urban Reconstruction in the Developing World: Learning through an International Best Practice, edited by Peter Robinson, Jeff McCarthy, and Clive Forster, 120–131. Sandtown, SA: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-socialist’ Age.” New Left Review 212: 68–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2003a. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by Nancy Fraser, and Axel Honneth, 7–88. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2003b. “Distorted Beyond All Recognition: A Rejoinder to Axel Honneth.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by Nancy Fraser, and Axel Honnet, 198–222. Verso City: London.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2010. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Stephen. 1993. The Elusive ‘Community’: The Dynamics of Negotiated Urban Development. Research Report no 28, Social Contract Series. Centre for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gigaba, Malusi, and Brij Maharaj. 1996. “Land Invasions during Political Transition: The Wiggins Saga in Cato Manor.” Development Southern Africa 13 (2): 217–235. doi: 10.1080/03768359608439890
   Google Scholar
• Huchzermeyer, Marie. 2011. Cities with ‘Slums’: From Informal Settlement Eradication to a Right to the City in Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kameri-Mbote, Patricia. 2006. “Righting Wrongs: The Politics of Restitution in Post-colonial Contexts.” Keynote Address presented at the conference, land, memory, reconstruction and justice: Perspectives on land restitution in South Africa, Cape Town, September 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grange. 2003. District Six: Heritage Impact Assessment. Cape Town: Lucien Le Grange Architects and Urban Planners.
   Google Scholar
• Lötter, H. P. P. 2005. “Compensating for Impoverishing Injustices of the Distant Past.” Politikon 32 (1): 83–102. doi: 10.1080/02589340500101766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LRC (Legal Resources Centre). 2000. Draft Cabinet Memo on Urban Restitution Claims: 6 March 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj, Brij. 2001. “Politics, Community Displacement and Planning: Cato Manor – Past, Present, Future.” In Transforming Settlement in Southern Africa, edited by Chris de Wet, and Roddy Fox, 133–146. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1963 [1844]. “On the Jewish Question.” In Karl Marx: Early Writings, edited and translated by Tom Bottomore, 26–53. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasen, S. 1997. “Restitution, Reconstruction, Reconciliation and Redistribution: Land Reform – Balancing the Interests of the Dispossessed, the Homeless and Development.” Stellenbosch Law Review 8: 360–376.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Popke, E. Jeffrey. 2000. “Violence and Memory in the Reconstruction of South Africa’s Cato Manor.” Growth and Change 30: 235–254. doi: 10.1111/0017-4815.00127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Anél. 2005. “‘Not Part of N2 Gateway Project’, District 6 Shacks ‘to be Fenced’”. Cape Times, October 19.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soudien, Crain. 2001. “District Six and its Uses in the Discussion about Non-racialism.” In Coloured by History, Shaped by Place, edited by Zimitri Erasmus, 114–130. Cape Town: Kwela Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism, edited by Amy Gutmann, 25–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todes, Alison. 2000. “Reintegrating the Apartheid City? Urban Policy and Urban Restructuring in Durban.” In A Companion to the City, edited by Gary Bride, and Sophie Watson, 617–629. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Cherryl. 2008. “Hidden Costs: Claiming Cato Manor/Umkhumbane.” Chap. 5 in Landmarked: Land Claims and Land Restitution in South Africa, 145–173. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar