Introducing digitalisation to strengthen evaluation systems for democracy in African parliaments

References

• Ali, Kiwikete, and Hanson. 2021. “Parliaments Looking Forward: Technology, Fourth Industrial Revolution and Complex Problems.” In African Parliaments: Evidence Systems for Governance and Development. African Sun, edited by Khumalo, Morkel, Mapitsa, Engel, and Ali. Media: Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., J. Christensen, C. M. Dahlmann, A. Mathiasen, and N. B. G. Petersen. 2019. “The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 1117–1140. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaser Mapitsa, C., A. J. Ali, and L. S. Khumalo. 2020. “From Evidence to Values-Based Decision Making in African Parliaments.” Evaluation Journal of Australasia 20 (2): 68–85. doi:10.1177/1035719X20918370.
   Google Scholar
• Bwalya, K. J. 2009. “Factors Affecting Adoption of e-Government in Zambia.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 38 (4): 1–13. doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00267.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A., C. Salisbury, R. Lart, K. Stewart, S. Peckham, M. Calnan, and H. Thorp. 2011. “Policy Makers’ Perceptions on the use of Evidence from Evaluations.” Evidence & Policy 7 (4): 429–447. doi:10.1332/174426411X603443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. 2006. “The Purposes of Evaluation in a Democratic Society.” In The Sage Handbook of Evaluation, 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., and F. Contini. 2012. Socio Technical Regimes and e-Government Deployment: The Case of the Italian Judiciary.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, K. D. 2017. “The six-Sphere Framework: A Practical Tool for Assessing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems.” African Evaluation Journal 5 (1). doi:10.4102/aej.v5i1.193
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran, L., J. Nicholls, A. Henney, et al. 2005. “The Contribution of Sociotechnical Systems Thinking to the Effective Adoption of e-Government and the Enhancement of Democracy.” The Electronic Journal of e-Government 3 (1): 1–12. www.ejeg.com.
   Google Scholar
• Draman, R., A. Titriku, I. Lampo, E. Hayter, and K. Holden. 2017. Evidence in African Parliaments. Oxford: INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Eberli, D. 2018. “Tracing the use of Evaluations in Legislative Processes in Swiss Cantonal Parliaments.” Evaluation and Program Planning 69: 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitsilis, Fotilios, Dimitris Koryzis, Dimitris Spiliotopoulos, and Yasilios. Svolopoulos. 2017. “Implementing Digital Parliament Innovative Concepts for Citizens and Policy Makers.” In HCIBGO 2017, Part I, LNCS 10293, edited by F. F.-H. Nah and C.-H. Tan, 154–170.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. B., M. Lumb, M. Bunn, and P. J. Burke. 2022. “Evaluation for Equity: Reclaiming Evaluation by Striving Towards Counter-Hegemonic Democratic Practices.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 54 (3): 277–290. doi:10.1080/00220620.2021.1931059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J., and M. Kyng, eds. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A. 2004. Democratic Governance and Evaluation, Paper presented at the Sixth EES (European Evaluation Society) Conference in Berlin, Germany – September 30–October 2, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A. 2006. “Evaluation of and for Democracy.” Evaluation 12 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1177/1356389006064194.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R.. 2006. “Understanding and Measuring eGovernment: International Benchmarking Studies.” UNDESA workshop, E-participation and E-government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future, Budapest, Hungary, July 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., and S. Bailur. 2007. “Analyzing e-Government Research: Perspectives, Philosophies, Theories, Methods, and Practice.” Government Information Quarterly 24 (3): 243–265. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• House, E. R., and K. R. Howe. 2000. “Deliberative Democratic Evaluation in Practice.” In Evaluation Models, edited by Daniel L. Stufflebeam, George F. Madaus, and Thomas Kellaghan, 409–421. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khumalo, L., C. Blaser Mapitsa, and C. Morkel. 2021. Systems of Evidence Use in African Parliaments. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Latib, S. 2014. “Bringing Politics and Contestation Back Into Monitoring and Evaluation.” Journal of Public Administration 49 (2): 460–473.
   Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, C. 2007. “The Impact of the Internet on Parliaments: A Legislative Studies Framework.” Parliamentary Affairs 60 (4): 655–674. doi:10.1093/pa/gsm040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahundu, F. G. 2015. “E-Governance in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Central Admission System in Tanzania.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Rhodes University.
   Google Scholar
• Mapitsa, C. B., P. Tirivanhu, and N. Pophiwa, eds. 2019. Evaluation Landscape in Africa. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. 1991. “When Democratic Evaluation Doesn't Seem Democratic.” Evaluation Practice 12 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1177/109821409101200103.
   Google Scholar
• Missingham, R. 2011. “E-parliament: Opening the Door.” Government Information Quarterly 28 (3): 426–434. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and W. Vandenabeele. 2008. “Behavioral Dynamics: Institutions, Identities, and Self-Regulation.” Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Picciotto, R. 2015. “Democratic Evaluation for the 21st Century.” Evaluation 21 (2): 150–166. doi:10.1177/1356389015577511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, G. 2011. “The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding Political Incentives and Institutional Behaviour in Parliamentary Support Strategies.” Published by The Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD) and Global Partners & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Power, G. 2013. The Politics of Parliamentary Strengthening: Understanding Political Incentives and Institutional Behavior in Parliamentary Support Strategies. London.: Global Partners/WFD.
   Google Scholar
• Romanelli, M. 2016. “New Technologies for Parliaments Managing Knowledge for Sustaining Democracy.” Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy 4 (4): 649–666.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., C. Kenny, A. Hobbs, and C. Tyler. 2020. “Improving the use of Evidence in Legislatures: The Case of the UK Parliament.” Evidence & Policy 16 (4): 619–638. doi:10.1332/174426420X15828100394351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotberg, R. I., and J. E. Salahub. 2013. African Legislative Effectiveness. North-South Institute (Ottawa) Research Report. www.nsi-ins.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Salih, M. A. M., W. Hout, K. Boafo-arthur, and J. C. Momba. 2005. “Introduction : The Changing Parliaments.” In African Parliaments : Between Governance and Government, edited by M. Salih, 3–24. New York: Palgrave MacMillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Sande, M. 2018. The State of Evidence Use in the Kenyan Parliament, AFIDEP. Accessed 14 April 2021. https://www.afidep.org/the-state-of-evidence-use-in-the-kenyan-parliament/.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, M., and F. Virili. 2003. “Socio-technical Perspectives on EGovernment Initiatives.” In Electronic Government, Second International Conference EGOV 2003, edited by R. Traunmueller, 91–94. Prague: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Trechsel, A. H., R. Kies, F. Mendez, and P. C. Schmitter. 2003. “Evaluation of the Use of New Technologies in order to Facilitate Democracy in Europe.” C2D-Research and Documentation Centre on Direct Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Yinka Fashagba, J. 2009. “Legislative Oversight Under the Nigerian Presidential System.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 15 (4): 439–459. doi:10.1080/13572330903302497.
   Google Scholar
• Zantsi, R. 2020. “The Evaluative Role of Legislatures in Creating a Responsive Executive.” African Evaluation Journal 8 (1): 1–6. doi:10.4102/aej.v8i1.432.
   Google Scholar