The Changing Nature of Public Administration: From Easy Answers to Hard Questions

References

• Allison, G T 1986. “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in all Unimportant Respects?”, in F S Lane (ed), Current Issues in Public Administration (3rd ed), New York: St Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Barberis, P 1998 “The New Public Management and a New Accountability,” Public Administration 76.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G, Peters, B G, Verhoerst, K & Verschuere, B 2002. “Organizational Performance in a Decentralised Public Sector.” Paper presented at Conference on Performance in Government, Greenberg Center, Syracuse University, October.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N & Olsen, J P 1993. The Reforming Organization, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J & Bowornwathana, B (eds) 2001 Civil Service Systems in Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R A 2000. Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, D & Verheijen, T 1998. Innovations in Public Management—Perspectives from East and West, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper. P J 2003 Governing By Contract: Challenges and Opportunities for Public Managers, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derhen, H-U 1999. “On the Selective Interpretation of Max Weber’s Concept of Bureaucracy in Organization Theory and Administrative Science,” in P Ahonen & K Palonen (eds), Dis-Embalming Max Weber, Jyvaskyla, Finland: SoPhi.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, Y & Van Hassel, H 2000. Contracting in New Public Management, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gawthrop, L C 1969. Bureaucratic Behavior in the Executive Branch, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, P 1994 Transforming Central Government: The Next Steps Initiative, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C 1999. “Variations in Contracting in Public Organizations.” Paper presented at annual meeting of the European Group of Public Administration, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J S 2002. “Reconsidering the Connection Between Capacity and Governance,” Public Organization Review 2.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J A (ed) 2002. The Civil Service in Anglo-American Democracies, Cheltenham- Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, S 2001. “The Diminishing Publicness of Public Sen ice Under the Current Mode of Governance,” Public Administration Review 61.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, J J, Hood, C & Peters, B G 2002. Paradoxes of Public Sector Reform. Berlin: Dunker and Seeboldt.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C 1990. “De-Sir Humphreying the Westminster Model of Bureaucracy”, Governance 3
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?”, Public Administration 69
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C 2001. “Relations Between Minister/Politicians and Civil Servants: Public Service Bargains Old and New,“ in B G Peters & D J Savoie (eds), Governance in the Twenty-first Century, Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W J M, Klijn, E-H & Koopenjan, J 1997 Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R 1996. “The backlash on new public management: a view from praxis”, in J J Hesse & T A J Toonen (eds), The European Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration, Baden-Baden Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D & Gaebler, T 1992. Reinventing Government, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L J 2000. American Intergovernmental Relations. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J, Bekke, H A G M & Toonen, TAJ (eds) 1996. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Bloomington: University of Indiana Press
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G 2000. The Future of Governing (2nd ed), Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G 2001. “The Politics of Policy Instruments”, in L M Salamon (ed), Handbook of Policy Instruments, New York’ Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G 2002. “Contracts and resource allocation in public governance,” in A Heritier (ed), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G & Pierre, J 1998. “Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G 1999. “Is There a Governance Theory?”, Paper presented at Triennial Conference of the International Political Science Association, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G 2000. “Citizens Versus the New Public Management: The Problem of Mutual Empowerment” Administration and Society 32.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G forthcoming. “Multi-level Governance: a Faustian Bargain9”, in A Gamble et al (eds), Research on Multi-level Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B G forthcoming. Politicization and the Public Service, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J & Peters, B G 2000. Governance, The State and Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J & Stoker, G 2000 “Towards Multi-level Governance.” in P Dunleavy, A Gamble. I Holliday & G Peele (eds). Developments in British Politics (6th ed), London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Plowden. W 1982 Ministers and Mandarins. London: RIPA.
   Google Scholar
• Polhtt. C & Bouckaert, G 2002. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Perspective (2nd ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Premfors, R 1991 “The ’Swedish Model’ and Public Sector Reform,” West European Politics 14.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes. RAW 1996. “The New Governance: Governing Without Governance,” Political Studies 44.
   Google Scholar
• Rist. R et al 1990. Program Evaluation and the Management of Government: Patterns and Prospects Across Eight Nations, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R 1974. The Problem of Party Government, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Martm, D 2000. Building the New Managenahst Shite, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L M 2002. “Introduction: New Governance, New Instruments,” in L Salamon (ed). Handbook of Policy Instruments, New York: O.xl ord University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie. D J 1994. Reagan, Thatcher, Mulroney: In Search of a New Bureaucracy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie. D Jforthcoming. Administration and Democracy. The Search for Space (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, B 1973. The Administrative Factor, London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenfeld, M 1992. “A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic state,” Harvard Law Review 105.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A 1997. “Studying Multi-level Governance Examples from French Translations of the Structural Funds, Public Administration 20.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M 1999. The Core Executive in Britain, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson. E 1997. “Democracy and Empowerment,” Public Administration 75.
   Google Scholar
• Steuerle, C E 2000 Vouchers and the Provision of Public Services, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C R 1987. “Changing Conceptions of Administration,” Brigham Young University Law Review.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C R 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State, Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C 1996. Ministers and Agencies:Control, Performance and Accountability, London: CIPFA
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K & Stewart, J 1992 “Change in the Management of Public Services,” Public Administration 70.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, V 2000. “Blurring the Public-private Divide,” in B G Peters & D J Savoie (eds) Governance in the Twenty-First Century, Montreal: McGill/Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar