Andragogy in blended learning contexts: effective tutoring of adult learners studying part-time, vocationally relevant degrees at a distance

References

• Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2008). Students’ approaches to learning and assessment preferences in a portfolio-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 359–374.10.1007/s11251-008-9060-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 152–155.10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.10.1348/000709901158433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondy, L. C. (2007). Evaluation and application of andragogical assumptions to the adult online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 116–130.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creanor, L. (2002). A tale of two courses: A comparative study of tutoring online. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 57–68.10.1080/02680510120110175
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, L., Anderson, T. M., Hammond, C., Jamieson, A., & Woodley, A. (2007). The social and economic benefits of part-time, mature study at Birkbeck College and the Open University. Milton Keynes: Open University. Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/42366787/surveyone.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1491989775&Signature=fJQUxUXvYsz3V05G5aXo1NKZsJE%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DThe_Social_and_Economic_Benefits_of_Part.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• George‐Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1–13.10.1080/07294360903277380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, A. P. (1996). Striking a critical pose: Andragogy – Missing links, missing values. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15(5), 382–392.10.1080/0260137960150506
   Google Scholar
• Hartree, A. (1984). Malcolm Knowles’ theory of andragogy: A critique. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 3(3), 203–210.10.1080/0260137840030304
   Google Scholar
• HESA. (2017 September 5). Students and graduates. Retrieved from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students
   Google Scholar
• Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54, 693–700.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P. (1985). The sociology of adult and continuing education. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P. (2012). Adult learning: Andragogy versus pedagogy or from pedagogy to andragogy. In P. Jarvis & M. Watts (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of learning (pp. 134–143). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2007). Reconsidering open and distance learning in the developing world: Meeting students’ learning needs. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446280119
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2003). The relationship between students’ course perception and their approaches to studying in undergraduate science courses: A Canadian experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 57–75.10.1080/0729436032000058623
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121–133.10.1080/01580370600751039
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, T., & De Freitas, S. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-learning models study report. Bristol: JISC.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L. M., Shelley, M. A., White, C. J., & Baumann, U. (2011). Tutor and student perceptions of what makes an effective distance language teacher. Distance Education, 32(3), 397–419.10.1080/01587919.2011.610290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachal, J. R. (2002). Andragogy’s detectives: A critique of the present and a proposal for the future. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 210–227.10.1177/0741713602052003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). The attainment and experiences of disabled students in distance education. Distance Education, 30(1), 87–102.10.1080/01587910902845931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E., & Woodley, A. (2001). Perceptions of academic quality among students with a hearing loss in distance education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 563–570.10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Savicevic, D. (2008). Convergence or divergence of ideas on andragogy in different countries. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(4), 361–378. doi:10.1080/02601370802051504
   Google Scholar
• Segers, M., Martens, R., & Van den Bossche, P. (2008). Understanding how a case-based assessment instrument influences student teachers’ learning approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1751–1764.10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillingford, S., & Karlin, N. J. (2013). The role of intrinsic motivation in the academic pursuits of nontraditional students. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 25, 91–102.10.1002/nha3.20033
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & Hammond, C. (2011). The motivations and outcomes of studying for part-time mature students in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(5), 591–612.10.1080/02601370.2011.579736
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W., & Laros, A. (2014). Researching the practice of fostering transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2), 134–147.10.1177/1541344614548589
   Google Scholar
• Tumuheki, P., Zeelen, J., & Openjuru, G. (2016). Motivations for participation in higher education: Narratives of non-traditional students at Makerere University in Uganda. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35(1), 102–117.10.1080/02601370.2016.1165745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers, P. (2002). A revision of the Biggs’ Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ). Higher Education Research and Development, 21(1), 73–92.10.1080/07294360220124666
   Google Scholar