Using PIAAC data to learn more about the literacy practices of adults

References

• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton & M. Hamilton (Eds.), Situated literacies. Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. (2011): A tale of IALS’s influence (or not) in the UK. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentieri, J. D. (2015). Adding new numbers to the literacy narrative: Using PIAAC data to focus on literacy practices. In M. Hamilton, B. Maddox, & C. Addey (Eds.), Literacy as numbers. Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment (pp. 93–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egloff, B. (1997). Biographische Muster “funktionaler Analphabeten”. Eine biographieanalytische Studie zu Entstehungsbedingungen und Bewältigungsstrategien von “funktionalem Analphabetismus”. Frankfurt/M: DIE.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, L., Kebede, B., & Maddox, B. (2014). The value of literacy practices. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen, E. (2011): IALS in Norway. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Gauly, B., Perry, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2016). Lebensumstände von Personen mit niedrigeren Lesekompetenzen. Analyse der grundlegenden Lesekomponenten aus PIAAC (Heft 1). Retrieved from https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/piaac/Brosrech%C3%BCre_A4_piaac_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2003). The new literacy studies: From ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton & M. Hamilton (Eds.), Situated literacies. Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies. Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.) London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, C. (2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Grotlüschen, A., & Buddeberg, K. (Eds.). (2019, May). LEO 2018 - Leben mit geringer Literalität (Living with Low Literacy). Hamburg: University of Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Grotlüschen, A., Mallows, D., Reder, S., & Sabatini, J. P. (Eds.). (2016). Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 131). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2012). Literacy and the politics of representation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (2012). Words at work and play. Three decades in family and community life. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, Mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelovits, J. (2011): A slow burn: The impact of IALS in Australia. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Nienkemper, B. (2015). Strategies in cases of functional illiteracy. Retrieved from http://blogs.epb.uni-hamburg.de/lea-verlinkungsstudie/files/2015/09/Strategies-in-cases-of-functional-illiteracy_Nienkemper_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Papen, U. (2005). Adult literacy as social practice. More than skills (New approaches to adult language, literacy and numeracy). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papen, U. (2012). Informal, incidental and ad hoc: The information-seeking and learning strategies of health care patients. Language and Education, 26(2), 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugsley, R. (2011): IALS in the US. A rippling impact on literacy policy. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., Zabal, A., Martin, S., Perry, A., Helmschrott, S., Massing, N., … Maehler, D. (2015). Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), Germany – reduced version. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. [ZA5845 Data file Version 2.0.0]. doi: 10.4232/1.12385.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, S. (1994). Practice engagement theory: A sociocultural approach to literacy across languages and cultures. In B. M. Ferdman, R.-M. Weber, & A. G. Ramirez (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures (SUNY series, literacy, culture, and learning, S (pp. 255–276). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, S. (2009). Scaling up and moving in: connecting social practices views to policies and programs in adult education. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 16(2), 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenson, K. (2011): An examination of IALS and its influence on adult literacy in Canada. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J. P., & Bruce, K. M. (2009). PIAAC reading component: A conceptual framework (OECD Education Working Papers, Bd. 33): OECD Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. (2011). Gar nicht so einfach! Arbeitsplatzanalysen zum Gebrauch der Kulturtechniken in einfachen Tätigkeiten des Niedriglohnsektors. In A.-K. Bindl, J. Schroeder, & M. Thielen (Eds.), Arbeitsrealitäten und Lernbedarfe wenig qualifizierter Menschen (pp. 159–208). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. C. (1996). Differences in adults’ reading practices and literacy proficiencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(2), 196–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair, R. (2011): Groundhog day? The 2009 re-run of the 1996 IALS in Scotland. Country story. Paper presented at the Fall Institute 2011, Centre for Literacy, Banff, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1993). Introduction: The new literacy studies. In B. V. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 1-22). Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge studies in oral and literate culture, Bd. 23, S. 1–22)
   Google Scholar
• Strucker, J., & Davidson, R. (2003). Adult Reading Components Study (ARCS). A NCSALL research brief. Harvard: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Strucker, J., Yamamoto, K., & Kirsch, I. (2007). The relationship of the component skills of reading to IALS performance: Tipping points and five classes of adult literacy learners (NCSALL Report #29) Cambridge: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Zeuner, C., & Pabst, A. (2011). ´´Lesen und Schreiben eröffnen eine neue Welt!´´ Literalität als soziale Praxis. Eine ethnographische Studie. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar