Identifying challenges and best practices for implementing AI additional qualifications in vocational and continuing education: a mixed methods analysis

References

• Attwell, G., Bekiaridis, G., Deitmer, L., Perini, M., Roppertz, S., & Tütlys, V. (2020). Artificial intelligence in policies, processes and practices of vocational education and training. Universitaet Bremen. https://media.suub.uni-bremen.de/bitstream/elib/4510/4/fb_71.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2020). Adult education survey (AES 2018 - Germany). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA7573 datenfile Version 1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13461
   Google Scholar
• Cedefop. (2015). CVET in Europe: The way ahead. Publications Office of the European Union. Cedefop reference series.
   Google Scholar
• Cedefop/OECD. (2021). The next steps for apprenticeship. Publications Office. Cedefop reference series; No 118. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/085907
   Google Scholar
• Chao, P. J., Hsu, T. H., Liu, T. P., & Cheng, Y. H. (2021). Knowledge of and competence in artificial intelligence: Perspectives of Vietnamese digital-native students. IEEE Access, 9, 75751–75760. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dignum, V. (2021). The role and challenges of education for responsible AI. London Review of Education, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditton, H., Arnoldt, B., Bornemann, E., & Zehme, M. (2013). Interessantheit und Relevanz des Fachlehrstoffs: QuaSSU – QualitätsSicherung in Schule und Unterricht. https://doi.org/10.7477/18:30:1
   Google Scholar
• Grivokostopoulou, F., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2013). Teaching AI search algorithms in a web-based educational system. In International Association for Development of the Information Society, International Conference e-Learning, Patras, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Gutschow, K., & Lorig, B. (2022). Kodifizierte Zusatzqualifikationen – Ziele, Modelle und Verbreitung. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 51(3), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hubackova, S., & Semradova, I. (2016). Evaluation of blended learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.044
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klímová, B., & Pražák, P. (2019). Mobile blended learning and evaluation of its effectiveness on students’ learning achievement. Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning: 12th International Conference, ICBL 2019, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, July 2–4, 2019, Proceedings 12, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (pp. 216–224). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, L., & Frey, D. (2021). Digitale Lehre an der Hochschule: Warum Blended Learning so gut funktioniert. In D. Frey & M. Uemminghaus (Eds.), Innovative Lehre an der Hochschule: Konzepte, Praxisbeispiele und Lernerfahrungen aus COVID-19 (pp. 69–86). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, A., Romeike, R., Jasute, E., & Pozdniakov, S. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence. 12th International conference on informatics in schools,“Situation, evaluation and perspectives”, ISSEP, Larnaca, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence , august 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morze, N., Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., Terletska, T., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2021, March). Implementation of adaptive learning at higher education institutions by means of Moodle LMS. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1840(1), 012062. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012062
   Google Scholar
• Naser, S. S. A. (2008). Developing visualization tool for teaching AI searching algorithms. Information Technology Journal, Scialert, 7(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2008.350.355
   Google Scholar
• Pouliakas, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence and job automation: An EU analysis using online job vacancy data. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ramm, G., Prenzel, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Lehmann, R., Leutner, D., Neubrand, M., Pekrun, R., Rolff, H.-G., Rost, J., & Schiefele, U. 2006. PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, K. J., Lao, L., Petridou, E., & Schmidt-Hertha, B. (2022). Needs and requirements for an additional AI qualification during dual vocational training: Results from studies of apprentices and teachers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100102
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, U., Goertz, L., & Behrens, J. (2016). Monitor Digitale Bildung. Berufliche Ausbildung im digitalen Zeitalter. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://doi.org/10.11586/2016001
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. T. (2017). Führt Lernen mit & ”Virtuellen Patienten” zu einem gesteigerten Lernerfolg? Eine randomisierte Studie unter Studierenden.
   Google Scholar
• Stadelmann, T., Keuzenkamp, J., Grabner, H., & Würsch, C. (2021). The AI-atlas: Didactics for teaching AI and machine learning on-site, online, and hybrid. Education Sciences, 11(7), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamenković, S., Jovanović, N., Vasović, B., Cvjetković, M., & Jovanović, Z. (2023). Software tools for learning artificial intelligence algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10436-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steib, C. J., & Stoffers, K. (2022). Blended Learning in der beruflichen Weiterbildung. ZBW Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 118(2), 296–334. https://doi.org/10.25162/zbw-2022-0012
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Twomey, P. (2018). The future of work and education for the digital age.
   Google Scholar
• Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1659
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Kuang, D., Liu, J., Yang, H., Zhang, Z., Mackworth, A., & Poole, D. (2020, April). AISpace2: An interactive visualization tool for learning and teaching artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(9), 13436–13443. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7068
   Google Scholar