A transformational approach to addressing the needs of a new generation of ‘left behinds: a preliminary exploration of the dominance of ‘it/digital literacy’ in organisational processes

References

• Ade Ojo, G. (2014). Towards a functional curriculum model of social literacy: Literacy for specific purposes. In V. Duckworth & G. Ade Ojo (Eds.), Landscapes of specific literacies in contemporary society: Exploring a social model of literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 11–27). Routledge. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415741248/.
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G. O., & Duckworth, V. (2019). Forms of institutionalised symbolic violence and resistance in the journey of a cohort of adult literacy learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G., & Duckworth, V. (2014). Introduction: Is practice keeping pace with theory? In V. Duckworth & G. Ade Ojo (Eds.), Landscapes of specific literacies in contemporary society: Exploring a social model of literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 1–11). Routledge. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415741248/.
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G., & Duckworth, V. (2015a). Adult literacy policy and practice from intrinsic values to instrumentalism. (1st). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535115.0002
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G. and Duckworth, V. (2015b). Changing value positions: A movement in transition. Adult Literacy, Policy and Practice: From Intrinsic Values to Instrumentalism. (1st). Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535115_2)
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G., & Duckworth, V. (2015c). The consolidation of an instrumental value position: The Moser committee. adult literacy, policy and practice: from intrinsic values to instrumentalism, (pp. 65–100). Palgrave Pivot, (1st ed.).https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535115_3.
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G., & Duckworth, V. (2015d). Exploring an alternative: a transformative curriculum driven by social capital. Adult Literacy, Policy and Practice: From Intrinsic Values to Instrumentalism. Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535115_4)
   Google Scholar
• Ade Ojo, G., & Duckworth, V. (2015e). Exploring the concepts: Instrumentalism, philosophy of education, ideology and value positions. Adult Literacy, Policy and Practice: From Intrinsic Values to Instrumentalism. (1st ed.). Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535115_1)
   Google Scholar
• Alter, S., & Dennis, A. (2002). Selecting research topics: personal experiences and speculations for the future. Communications of AIS, 8, Article (1), 1–31. Retrieved June 29, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228883408_Selecting_Research_Topics_Personal_Experiences_and_Speculations_For_the_Future
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000) (Eds). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethicalguidelines-for-educational-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Choy, S. (2009). Transformational learning in the workplace. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344609334720
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G., (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colom, A. (2020). The digital divide, information. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1706–1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1781916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (2001). Conducting experimental research in information systems. Communications of the AIS, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00705
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, V., & Ade Ojo, G. (2014). Landscapes of specific literacies in contemporary society: Exploring a social model of literacy. 1. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415741248/
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, V., & Smith, R. (2019). Transformative teaching and learning in further education. UCU layout 1 (ucu.Org.uk). Retrieved November 21, 20232.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• George, T. (2022, October 25). Mixed Methods Research | Definition, Guide, & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 10 June, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/mixed-methods/
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2012). The digital literacy campaign’. Reported in the Guardian Newspaper. January 12.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, J., & Hernández, Ó. (2018). The making of survival. Technology, literacy, and learning in Two microenterprises in Mexico City. Information Technologies & International Development, 14, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kania-Lundholm, M., & Torres, S. (2018). Ideology, power and inclusion: Using the critical perspective to study how older ICT users make sense of digitisation. Media Culture & Society, 40(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718781983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, & Lankshear, C. (2022). Some enabling effects of technologies in everyday life: two cases of ordinary uses of digital devices. Retrieved June 27, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358983280.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. (1982). A garbage can model of the research process. In J. McGrath, J. Martin, & R. Kulka (Eds.), Judgement calls in research: An unorthodox view of the research process (pp. 17–39). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2009a). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 90–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2009b). Transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & E. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice. Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 18–31). Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Neendoor, S. (2023). The role of technology in the workplace. Retrieved November 28, 2023. Online blog article accessed online via. https://kitaboo.com/author/snehnath-neendoor/.
   Google Scholar
• Paulston, R. G. (1996). Social cartography: Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, S. (2015). Digital inclusion and digital literacy in the United States: a portrait from piaac’s survey of adult skills. Retrieved March 18, 2024, from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/551c3e82e4b0d2fede6481f9/1427914370277/Reder_PIAAC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, N., Mahmood, A., Ibtasam, M., Murtaza, S. A., Iqbal, N., & Molnár, E. (2021). The psychology of resistance to change: the antidotal effect of organizational justice, support and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 678952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. (2006). Escaping the slums or changing the slums? Lifelong learning and social transformation1. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500510736
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8500900505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. (2012, July). Rationale and procedures for nesting semi-structured interviews in surveys or censuses. Popul Stud (Camb), 66(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.658851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice (Vol. 9). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, J., & Street, V. (1995). The Schooling of Literacy. In J. B. Bourne, M. Murphy, P. Briggs& M. Selinger (Eds.), Subject Learning in the Primary Curriculum: Issues in English, Science and Maths (1st ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203990247
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475
   Google Scholar
• Tett, L., Hamilton, M., & Crowther, J. (2012). More powerful literacies. NIACE; Cambridge Publishing Management.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, T. (2017). Reclaiming information & communication technologies for development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UPPSEM. (2001). Report on social exclusion/inclusion. Retrieved November 24, 2023, from http://www.uppinghamsemi-nars.org
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide (p. 2). Polity Press. 978-1-509-534456.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmson, L., Aberg, M., Backstrom, T., & Olsson, B. (2015). Enabling transformative learning in the workplace: an educative research intervention. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344615574599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., & Andersson, A. (2018). Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1396020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar