The validity and reliability of focus groups as a research method in adult education

References

• AGAR , M. and MACDONALD , J. 1995 . Focus groups and ethnography . Human Organization , 54 : 78 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AGUETTAZ , P. 2000 . Stratégies d'Amélioration de l'Education des adultes dans des contexts régionaux Aoste
   Google Scholar
• ALDAG , R. J. and FULLER , S. R. 1993 . Beyond fiasco: a reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision process . Psychological Bulletin , 113 : 533 – 552 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLOOR , M. , FRANKLAND , J. , THOMAS , M. and ROBSON , K. 2001 . Focus Group in Social Research , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• COFFIELD , F. , ed. 2000 . The Learning Society: knowledge and skills for employment , Bristol : The Policy Press . two vols
   Google Scholar
• DILTHEY , W. 1976 . Selected Writings , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• EMERSON , R. 1981 . Observational fieldwork . Annual Review of Sociology , 7 : 315 – 378 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIELD , J. 2000 . Researching Lifelong Learning Through Focus Groups . Journal of Further and Higher Education , 24 : 324 – 335 .
   Google Scholar
• FLOWERS , M. L. 1977 . A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35 : 888 – 896 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FORD , T. R. 1977 . The production of social knowledge for public use . Social Forces , 56 : 504 – 518 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GREENBAUM , L. T. 2000 . Moderating focus group. A practical guide for group facilitation , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• GUBA , E. G. and LINCOLN , Y. S. 1989 . Fourth Generation Evaluation , Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• HABERMAS , J. 1976 . Some distinctions in universal pragmatics . Theory and Society , 3 : 155 – 167 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HABERMAS , J. 1981 . Interpretatieve sociale wetenschap versus radicale hermeneutiek . Kennis en Methode , 5 : 4 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• HABERMAS , J. 1984 . The Theory of Communicative Action , Boston, MA : Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• HAMMERSLEY , M. 1987 . Some notes on the terms ‘validity’ and ‘reliability’ . British Educational Research Journal , 13 : 73 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• HELMER , O. 1965 . Analysis of the future: the Delphi method , Santa Monica, CA : Rand Corporation .
   Google Scholar
• HERON , J. 1996 . Co-operative inquiry. Research into the human condition , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSON , A. 1996 . It's good to talk: the focus group and the sociological imagination . Sociological Review , 44 : 517 – 538 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOHNSON , D. W. and JOHNSON , F. P. 2000 . Joining together—Group theory and group skills , London : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• KIDD , P. S. and PARSHALL , M. B. 2000 . Getting the focus and the group: enhancing analytical rigour in focus group research . Qualitative Health Research , 10 : 293 – 308 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIRK , J. and MILLER , M. L. 1986 . Reliability and validity in qualitative research , Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• KRUEGER , R. A. 1998 . Analysing and reporting focus group results , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• KVALE , S. 1996 . InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• LEIRMAN , W. 1995 . Euro-Delphi a comparative study on the future of adult education in 14 countries between 1993 and 1995 . International Journal of Lifelong Education , 15 : 125 – 138 .
   Google Scholar
• LEIRMAN , W. Gearing adult education offerings to the needs of a region and its citizens: Delphi projects leading to the Edufora in Flanders . Conference ‘Education for Social Democracies: changing forms and sites’ . July 3–5 2000 , London. Available online
   Google Scholar
• LINCOLN , Y. S. and GUBA , E. G. 1985 . Naturalistic Inquiry , Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• LINSTONE , H. and TUROFF , M. 1975 . The Delphi Method, Techniques and Applications , London : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• MAXWELL , J. A. 1992 . Understanding and validity in qualitative research . Harvard Educational Review , 62 : 279 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCAULEY , C. 1989 . The nature of social influence in groupthink: compliance and internalisation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57 : 250 – 260 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MERTON , R. K. and KENDALL , P. L. 1946 . The focused interview . American Journal of Sociology , 51 : 541 – 557 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORGAN , D. L. 1996 . Focus groups . Annual Review of Sociology , 22 : 129 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORGAN , D. L. 1997 . Focus groups as qualitative research , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• MORGAN , D. L. 1998 . The focus groups guidebook , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• REASON , P. and BRADBURY , H. 2001 . “ Inquary and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration ” . In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice , Edited by: REASON , P. and BRADBURY , H. 1 – 14 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• RICOEUR , P. 1979 . Main Trends in Philosophy , New York : Holmes and Meier .
   Google Scholar
• SILVERMAN , D. 2001 . Doing Qualitative research—A Practical Handbook , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• SMALING , A. 1992 . Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity—the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity . Quality and Quantity , 26 : 169 – 180 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMALING , A. 1994 . The pragmatic dimension. Paradigmatic and pragmatic aspects of choosing a qualitative or quantitative method . Quality and Quantity , 28 : 233 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMALING , A. 2000 . What kind of dialogue should paradigm-dialogues be? . Quality and Quantity , 34 : 51 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TETLOCK , P. E. 1979 . Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 : 1314 – 1324 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAUGHN , S. , SCHUMM , J. S. and SINAGUB , J. 1996 . Focus group interviews in education and psychology , London, New Delhi : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• VEEN , R. van and RAAK , J. van , eds. 2001 . Focus Groups: Intervention Strategies for Citizenship and Governance—Analysis of Focus groups , Nijmegen : KUN . Available online
   Google Scholar
• WALKER , C. L. and TEDICK , D. J. 2000 . The complexity of immersion education: teachers address the issues . Modern Language Journal , 84 : 5 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEIL , S. 2000 . Twinning theoretical and methodological concerns: an emerging paradigm from (youth) research , Northampton : UP .
   Google Scholar
• WILKINSON , S. 1998 . Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and the construction of meaning . Women Studies International Forum , 21 : 111 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WINTER , G. 2000 . A comparative discussion of the notion of validity . Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 4 Avaliable online:
   Google Scholar
• ZOLINGEN , S. van and KLAASSEN , C. A. 2003 . Selection process in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education . Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 70 : 317 – 340 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar