An Analysis of Sex-related Differential Item Functioning in Attitude Assessment

References

• ALLAOUF , A. , HAMBLETON , R. and SIRECI , S. 1999 . Identifying the cause of DIF in translated verbal items . Journal of Educational Measurement , 36 (3) : 185 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANGOFF , W. 1993 . “ Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology ” . In Differential Item Functioning , Edited by: HOLLAND , P. and WAINER , H. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence ErIbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• CAMILLI , G. and SHEPARD , L. A. 1994 . Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items , Beverly Hills : CA,Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• DORANS , N. J. 1989 . Two new approaches to assessing differential item functioning: standardization andthe Mantel-Haenszel method . Applied Measurement in Education , 2 (3) : 217 – 233 .
   Google Scholar
• DORANS , N. and HOLLAND , P. 1993 . “ DIP detecting and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization ” . In Differential Item Functioning , Edited by: HOLLAND , P. and WAINER , H. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence ErIbaumAssociates .
   Google Scholar
• FANG , T. 1994 . The performance of the Mantel-Haenszel and logistic regression DIF identificationprocedures with real data , Canada : University of Ottawa . Unpublished masters thesis
   Google Scholar
• HAMBLETON , R. K. , SWAMINATHAN , H. and ROGERS , H. J. 1991 . Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• HENDERSON , M. , MORRIS , L. and FITZ-GIBBON , C. 1987 . How to Measure Attitudes , Newbury Park : CA,Sage .
   Google Scholar
• HOLLAND , P. and THAYER , D. 1986 . Differential item performance and Mantel-Haenszel procedure , ERICDocument Reproduction Service NO. ED 272 577
   Google Scholar
• HULIN , C. L. , DRASGOW , F. and PARSONS , C. 1983 . Item Response Theory Application to PsychologicalMeasurement , Homewood, IL : The Dorsey Professional Series .
   Google Scholar
• JOHANSON , G. A. 1997 . Differential item functioning in attitude assessment . Evaluation Practice , 8 (2) : 127 – 135 .
   Google Scholar
• MANTEL , N. and HAENSZEL , W. 1959 . Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studiesof disease . Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 22 (4) : 719 – 748 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MARIE , L. 1997 . The application of item response theory to employee attitude survey data usingSamejima's graded response model , the University of Connecticut . Unpublished PhD thesis
   Google Scholar
• OOSTERHOF , A. 1994 . Classroom Application of Educational Measurement , New York : MacmillanCollege Publishing Company .
   Google Scholar
• ZIEKY , M. 1993 . “ Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development ” . In Differential Item Functioning , Edited by: HOLLAND , P. and WAINER , H. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar