Instructors' uses, experiences, thoughts and suggestions regarding Calibrated Peer Review

References

• Emerson , L. , MacKay , B.R. , MacKay , M.B. and Funnell , K.A. 2006 . A team of equals: Teaching writing in the sciences . Educational Action Research , 14 ( 1 ) : 65 – 81 .
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 1995 . Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment . Innovations in Education and Training International , 32 ( 2 ) : 175 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman , M. 1995 . Peer assessment by groups of group work . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 20 ( 3 ) : 289 – 301 .
   Google Scholar
• Furman , B. and Robinson , W. Improving engineering report writing with Calibrated Peer Review . Paper presented at the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference . November 5–8 , Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdeman , R.D. , Russell , A.R. and Worden , K.J. 2007 . Web‐based student writing and reviewing in a large biology lecture course . Journal of College Science Teaching , March/April : 46 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Gunersel , A.B. and Simpson , N.J. 2009 . Improvement in writing and reviewing skills with Calibrated Peer Reviewtm . International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 3 ( 2 ) : 1 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Gunersel , A.B. , Simpson , N.J. , Aufderheide , K. and Wang , L. 2008 . Effectiveness of Calibrated Peer Reviewtm for improving writing and critical thinking skills in biology undergraduate students . Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 8 ( 2 ) : 25 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Hand , B. , Hohenshell , L. and Prain , V. 2007 . Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on year 10 biology students' understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts . Instructional Science , 35 ( 4 ) : 343 – 73 .
   Google Scholar
• Hartberg , Y. , Gunersel , A.B. , Simpson , N.J. and Balester , V. 2008 . Development of student writing in biochemistry using Calibrated Peer Review . Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 8 ( 1 ) http://www.iupui.edu/~josotl/VOL_8/No_1/V8N1_TOC.htm
   Google Scholar
• Holliday , W.G. , Yore , L.D. and Alvermann , D.E. 1994 . The reading‐science learning‐writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 31 : 877 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney‐Kennicutt , W.L. , Gunersel , A.B. and Simpson , N.J. 2008 . Overcoming student resistance to a teaching innovation . International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 2 ( 1 ) http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/issue_v2n1.htm (accessed December 20, 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Klein , P.D. 1999 . Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing‐to‐learn . Educational Psychology Review , 11 ( 3 ) : 203 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac , J. and Sherwood , D.W. 1999 . Writing in chemistry: An effective learning tool . Journal of Chemical Education , 76 ( 10 ) : 1399 – 1403 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea , M.R. and Street , B.V. 1998 . Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach . Studies in Higher Education , 23 ( 2 ) : 157 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln , Y.S. and Guba , E.G. 1985 . Naturalistic inquiry , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Lowman , J. 1996 . “ Assignments that promote learning ” . In Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice , Edited by: Menges , R.J. , Weimer , M. and Associates . 203 – 31 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey‐Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Margerum , L.D. , Gulsrud , M. , Manlapez , R. , Rebong , R. and Love , A. 2007 . Application of calibrated peer review (CPR) writing assignments to enhance experiments with an environmental chemistry focus . Journal of Chemical Education , 84 ( 2 ) : 292 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• McCarty , T. , Parkes , M.V. , Anderson , T.T. , Mines , J. , Skipper , B.L. and Greboksy , J. 2005 . Improved patient notes from medical students during web‐based teaching using faculty‐calibrated peer review and self‐assessment . Academic Medicine , 80 : 67 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P. , Merry , S. and Callaghan , A. 2004 . Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self‐assessment . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 41 ( 3 ) : 273 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelaez , N.J. 2002 . Problem‐based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology . Advanced Physiology Education , 26 : 174 – 84 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope , N.K. 2005 . The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 ( 1 ) : 51 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Rivard , L.P. , Stanley , B. and Straw , S.B. 2000 . The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study . Science Education , 84 ( 5 ) : 566 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell , A. 2001 . The evaluation of CPR. Prepared for HP e‐Education. Business Development , Los Angeles : UCLA .
   Google Scholar
• Saavedra , R. and Kwun , S.K. 1993 . Peer evaluation in self‐managing work groups . Journal of Applied Psychology , 78 ( 3 ) : 450 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searby , M. and Ewers , T. 1997 . An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 22 ( 4 ) : 371 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans , D. , Brand‐Gruwel , S. and Van Merrienboer , J. 2002 . Peer assessment training in teacher education . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 ( 5 ) : 443 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans , D. , Dochy , F. and Moerkerke , G. 1999 . Creating a learning environment by using self‐, peer‐ and co‐assessment . Learning Environments Research , 1 : 293 – 319 .
   Google Scholar
• Stefani , L.A.J. 1994 . Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities . Studies in Higher Education , 19 ( 1 ) : 69 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping , K.J. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 ( 3 ) : 249 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar