16,869
Views
578
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal

Pages 535-550 | Published online: 25 Aug 2010

References

  • Andrade , H. and Du , Y. 2007 . Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 159 – 81 .
  • Ausubel , D. 1963 . The psychology of meaningful verbal learning , New York : Grune & Stratton .
  • Bjorkman , M. 1972 . Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: Notes on a neglected issue . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 13 : 152 – 8 .
  • Black , P. and Wiliam , D. 1998 . Assessment and classroom learning . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , 5 : 7 – 74 .
  • Boud , D. , Cohen , R. and Sampson , J. 2001 . Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other , London : Routledge .
  • Bruner , J.S. , Goodnow , J.J. and Austin , G.A. 1956 . A study of thinking , New York : John Wiley .
  • Butler , R. 1987 . Task‐involving and ego‐involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance . Journal of Educational Psychology , 79 : 474 – 82 .
  • Carless , D. 2006 . Differing perceptions in the feedback process . Studies in Higher Education , 31 : 219 – 33 .
  • Carless , D. 2007 . Conceptualizing pre‐emptive formative assessment . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , 14 : 171 – 84 .
  • Carroll , J.B. 1968 . On learning from being told . Educational Psychologist , 5 : 4 – 10 .
  • Case , S. 2007 . Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 285 – 99 .
  • Chanock , K. 2000 . Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? . Teaching in Higher Education , 5 : 95 – 105 .
  • Crisp , B. 2007 . Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 571 – 81 .
  • Crooks , T.J. 1988 . The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students . Review of Educational Research , 58 : 438 – 81 .
  • Duncan , N. 2007 . Feed‐forward: Improving students’ use of tutors’ comments . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 : 271 – 83 .
  • Ellery , K. 2008 . Assessment for learning: A case study using feedback effectively in an essay‐style test . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 33 : 421 – 9 .
  • Hattie , J. and Timperley , H. 2007 . The power of feedback . Review of Educational Research , 77 : 81 – 112 .
  • Higgins , R. , Hartley , P. and Skelton , A. 2001 . Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 6 : 269 – 74 .
  • Higgins , R. , Hartley , P. and Skelton , A. 2002 . The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning . Studies in Higher Education , 27 : 53 – 64 .
  • Hounsell , D. , McCune , V. , Hounsell , J. and Litjens , J. 2008 . The quality of guidance and feedback to students . Higher Education Research and Development , 27 : 55 – 67 .
  • Kaplan , A. 1964 . The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science , San Francisco : Chandler .
  • Kulhavy , R.W. 1977 . Feedback in written instruction . Review of Educational Research , 47 : 211 – 32 .
  • Lizzio , A. and Wilson , K. 2008 . Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 33 : 263 – 75 .
  • Natriello , G. 1987 . The impact of evaluation processes on students . Educational Psychologist , 22 : 155 – 75 .
  • Nesbit , P. and Burton , S. 2006 . Student justice perceptions following assignment feedback . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 : 655 – 70 .
  • Nicol , D.J. and Macfarlane‐Dick , D. 2006 . Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice . Studies in Higher Education , 31 : 199 – 218 .
  • Orsmond , P. , Merry , S. and Reiling , K. 2005 . Biology students’ utilization of tutors’ formative feedback: A qualitative interview study . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 : 369 – 86 .
  • Polanyi , M. 1962 . Personal knowledge: Towards a post‐critical philosophy , London : Routledge/Kegan Paul .
  • Poulos , A. and Mahony , M.J. 2008 . Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 33 : 143 – 54 .
  • Race , P. 2007 . How to get a good degree: Making the most of your time at university , 2nd ed. , Maidenhead : Open University Press/McGraw‐Hill .
  • Rae , A.M. and Cochrane , D.K. 2008 . Listening to students: How to make written assessment feedback useful . Active Learning in Higher Education , 9 : 217 – 30 .
  • Ramsden , P. 2003 . Learning to teach in higher education , 2nd ed. , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
  • Rust , C. , Price , M. and O’Donovan , B. 2003 . Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 : 147 – 64 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 1980 . Conveying the findings of evaluative inquiry . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 2 ( 2 ) : 53 – 7 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 1987 . Specifying and promulgating achievement standards . Oxford Review of Education , 13 : 191 – 209 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 1989 . Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems . Instructional Science , 18 : 119 – 44 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 1998 . Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice , 5 : 77 – 84 .
  • Sadler , D.R. 2009a . “ Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning ” . In Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education , Edited by: Joughin , G. 49 – 64 . Dordrecht : Springer .
  • Sadler , D.R. 2009b . Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading in higher education . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 : 159 – 79 .
  • Taras , M. 2006 . Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 : 365 – 77 .
  • van den Berg , I. , Admiraal , W. and Pilot , A. 2006 . Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 : 135 – 47 .
  • Vygotsky , L.S. 1934/1986 . Thought and language , Edited by: Kozulin , A. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press . (Originally published in Russian as Myshlenie I rech 1934)
  • Walker , M. 2009 . An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 : 67 – 78 .
  • Weaver , M. 2006 . Do students value feedback? Students’ perception of tutors’ written response . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 : 379 – 94 .
  • Wittgenstein , L. 1974 . Philosophical investigations , Edited by: Anscombe , G.E.M. Oxford : Basil Blackwell . (Original work 3rd ed. published in 1967)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.