But is it fair? Developing students’ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment

References

• Baird , J. , Greatorex , J. and Bell , J.F. 2004 . What makes marking reliable? Experiments with UK examinations . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 11 ( 3 ) : 331 – 48 .
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham , S. 2009 . Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 ( 2 ) : 209 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham , S. and Boyd , P. 2007 . Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide , Maidenhead : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham , S. , Boyd , P. , Ashworth , M. and Orr , S. Investigating the mysteries of marking: The implications of staff marking practices for academic development . Paper presented at the Improving Student Learning Symposium . September 7–9 . London : Imperial College .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 2000 . Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society . Studies in Continuing Education , 22 ( 2 ) : 151 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• Bouzidi , L. 2009 . Can online peer assessment be trusted? . Educational Technology and Society , 12 ( 4 ) : 257 – 68 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless , D. 2006 . Differing perceptions in the feedback process . Studies in Higher Education , 31 ( 2 ) : 219 – 33 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho , K. , Schunn , C.D. and Kwon , K. Learning writing by reviewing in science . Paper presented at the proceedings of the 8th international conference on Computer‐Supported Collaborative Learning . July , New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 2003 . Involving students in assessment . Psychology Learning and Teaching , 32 ( 2 ) : 102 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson , G. , Sheader , E. and Grady , R. 2008 . Computer‐assisted and peer assessment: A combined approach to assessing first year laboratory practical classes for large numbers of students . Bioscience Education E‐journal , 11 ( 4 ) http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej-11-4.aspx (accessed May 29, 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Knight , P. 2006 . The local practices of assessment . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 31 ( 4 ) : 435 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Lea , M. and Street , B. 1998 . Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach . Studies in Higher Education , 23 ( 2 ) : 157 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell , D. 2002 . The experience of collaborative assessment in e‐learning . Studies in Continuing Education , 24 ( 1 ) : 73 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• McConnell , D. 2006 . E‐learning groups and communities , Maidenhead : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Orr , S. 2006 . “ Justify 66 to me! An investigation in to the social practice of agreeing marks in an HE Art and Design department ” . In Improving student learning through assessment , Edited by: Rust , C. 283 – 93 . Oxford : Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development .
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond , P. 2004 . Self and peer‐assessment: Guidance in practice in the biosciences , Leeds : Centre for Bioscience, The Higher Education Academy .
   Google Scholar
• Read , B. , Francis , B. and Robson , J. 2005 . Gender, ‘bias’, assessment and feedback: Analyzing the written assessment of undergraduate history essays . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 ( 3 ) : 241 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , D.R. 2008 . “ Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning ” . In Assessment learning and judgement in higher education , Edited by: Joughin , G. 45 – 63 . Dordrecht, , The Netherlands : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , D.R. 2010 . Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 35 ( 5 ) : 535 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter , J. , Herl , H.E. , Chung , G.K.W.K. , Dennis , R.A. and O’Neil Jr , H.F. 1999 . Computer‐based performance assessments: A solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem‐solving . Computers in Human Behaviour , 15 ( 3–4 ) : 403 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay , S. 2005 . The assessment of complex tasks: A double reading . Studies in Higher Education , 30 ( 6 ) : 663 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss , J.F. and Post , T.A. 1988 . “ On the solving of ill‐structured problems ” . In The nature of expertise , Edited by: Chi , M.T. , Glaser , R. and Farr , M.J. 261 – 85 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar