Examining PhD and research masters theses

References

• Anderson , C. , Day , K. and McLaughlin , P. 2006 . Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of master’s level dissertation supervision . Studies in Higher Education , 31 ( 2 ) : 149 – 168 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany-Saltikov , J. , Kilinc , S. and Stow , K. 2009 . Bones, boys, bombs and booze: An exploratory study of the reliability of marking theses across disciplines . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 ( 6 ) : 621 – 639 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. 2010. One step beyond: Making the most of postgraduate education. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/BISCore/corporate/docs/P/10-704-one-step-beyond-postgraduate-education.pdf (accessed May 26, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hansford , B.C. and Maxwell , T.W. 1993 . A masters degree program: Structural components and examiners’ comments . Higher Education Research and Development , 12 ( 2 ) : 171 – 187 .
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook , A. , Bourke , S. , Lovat , T. and Dally , K. 2004 . Investigating Ph.D. thesis examination reports . International Journal of Educational Research , 41 : 98 – 120 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnston , S. 1997 . Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners’ report on doctoral theses . Studies in Higher Education , 22 ( 3 ) : 333 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson , A. , Marsh , H. and Tansley , T. 2003 . Examining the examiners . Australian Universities Review , 46 ( 1 ) : 32 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Mullins , G. and Kiley , M. 2002 . ‘It’s a Ph.D. not a Nobel prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses . Studies in Higher Education , 2 ( 4 ) : 369 – 386 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble , K.A. 1994 . Changing doctoral degrees: An international perspective , Buckingham : The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pilcher , N. 2011 . The UK postgraduate masters dissertation: An ‘elusive chameleon’? . Teaching in Higher Education , 16 ( 1 ) : 29 – 40 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkethly , A. and Prosser , M. 1995 . “ Examiners’ comments on the international context of Ph.D. theses ” . In Research into higher education: Dilemmas, directions and diversion , Edited by: Mcnaught , C. and Beattie , K. 129 – 136 . Melbourne : HERDSA .
   Google Scholar
• Powell , S. and Green , H. 2003 . Research degree examining: Quality issues of principle and practice . Quality Assurance in Education , 11 ( 2 ) : 55 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Shaw , M. and Green , D. 2002 . Benchmarking the Ph.D. – A tentative beginning . Quality Assurance in Education , 10 ( 2 ) : 116 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler , P. and Jackson , C. 2004 . The doctoral examination process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors , Berkshire : Society for Research into Higher Education .
   Google Scholar
• Winter , R. , Griffiths , M. and Green , K. 2000 . The ‘academic’ qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based Ph.D. . Studies in Higher Education , 25 ( 1 ) : 25 – 37 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar