Where angels fear to tread: online peer-assessment in a large first-year class

References

• Ballantyne , Roy , Hughes , Karen and Mylonas , Aliisa . 2002 . Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 ( 5 ) : 427 – 441 . doi: 10.1080/0260293022000009302
   Google Scholar
• Bouzidi , L’hadi and Jaillet , Alain . 2009 . Can online peer assessment be trusted? . Journal of Educational Technology & Society , 12 ( 4 ) : 257 – 268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering , A.W. and Gamson , Z.F. 1987 . Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education . AAHE Bulletin , 39 ( 7 ) : 3 – 7 .
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Kwangsu, Christian D. Schunn, and Roy W. Wilson. 2006. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891. http://supp.apa.org/psycarticles/supplemental/edu_98_4_891/edu_98_4_891_supp.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cole , Jason R. 2005 . Using moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system , 1st ed , Sebastopol , CA : O’Reilly Community Press .
   Google Scholar
• Crockett, Geoffrey, and Peter Vasanthi. 2003. Extended case study: Peer assessment in a second year macroeconomics unit | The economics network. http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/showcase/crockett_peer.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Davies , Phil . 2000 . Computerized peer assessment . Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 37 ( 4 ) : 346 – 355 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies , Phil . 2009 . Review and reward within the computerised peer-assessment of essays . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 ( 3 ) : 321 – 333 . doi: 10.1080/02602930802071072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doiron , G. 2003 . The value of online student peer review, evaluation and feedback in higher education . CDTL Brief , 6 ( 9 ) : 1 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Draaijer, Silvester, and Patris van Boxel. 2006. Summative peer assessment using ‘Turnitin’ and a large cohort of students: A case study. CAA Conference. Loughborough University. http://hdl.handle.net/2134/4559.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , Gwen . 2001 . Looking at ourselves – self-assessment and peer assessment: Practice examples from New Zealand . Reflective Practice , 2 ( 3 ) : 289 – 302 . doi: 10.1080/14623940120103031
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , Graham . 1999 . “ Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn ” . In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches , Edited by: Brown , Sally A. and Angela , Glasner . 41 – 53 . Buckingham : SHRE and Open University Press Imprint, Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gielen , Sarah , Dochy , Filip and Onghena , Patrick . 2011 . An inventory of peer assessment diversity . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 36 ( 2 ) : 137 – 155 . doi: 10.1080/02602930903221444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauerholz , Liz . 1999 . Creating and teaching writing-intensive courses . Teaching Sociology , 27 ( 4 ) : 310 – 323 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamer, J., C. Kell, and F. Spence. 2007. Peer assessment using aropä. Vol. 54, 66, Proceedings of the ninth Australasian conference on computing education. Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan , Stephanie J. and Isaacs , Geoff . 2001 . Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views . Higher Education Research & Development , 20 ( 1 ) : 53 – 70 . doi: 10.1080/07924360120043658
   Google Scholar
• Li , Lan and Steckelberg , Allen L. 2005 . Peer assessment support system (PASS) . TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning , 49 ( 4 ) : 80 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• McLuckie , J. and Topping , Keith J. 2004 . Transferable skills for online peer learning . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 5 ) : 563 – 584 . doi: 10.1080/02602930410001689144
   Google Scholar
• Mento , A.J. 2004 . Epiphany: A story of improving teaching effectiveness in an executive MBA economics course . Journal of Executive Education , 3 ( 1 ) : 17 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Mudrák, David. Development: Workshop 2.0 Specification. MoodleDocs. http://docs.moodle.org/en/Development:Workshop_2.0_specification.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, Duncan D. 2010. Peer and self-assessment in the first year of university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/02602930903540983.
   Google Scholar
• Paré , D.E. and Joordens , S. 2008 . Peering into large lectures: Examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 24 ( 6 ) : 526 – 540 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, Nitin. Moodle workshop case study. http://www.slideshare.net/nrparmar/moodle-workshop-case-study-1807686.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton , M. 1997 . “ Transforming assessment practices into learning processes ” . In Access to success: Academic literacy in higher education , Edited by: Angelil-Carter , Shelley . 136 – 158 . Cape Town : University of Cape Town Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pope , Nigel . 2001 . An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 26 ( 3 ) : 235 – 246 . doi: 10.1080/02602930120052396
   Google Scholar
• Race, Philip. 2001. A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. Resources, http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/SNAS/snas_901.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, Chris. 2001. A briefing on assessment of large groups. Assessment Series No. 12. Heslington: LTSN Generic Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Salemi , Michael K. , Siegfried , John J. , Sosin , Kim , Walstad , William B. and Watts , Michael . 2001 . Research in economic education: Five new initiatives . American Economic Review , 91 ( 2 ) : 440 – 445 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Ian, Nan Yeld, and Jane Hendry. 2007. A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Higher Education Monitor 6. Cape Town: Council on Higher Education. http://www.che.ac.za/.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth , Karen . 2004 . The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 3 ) : 369 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Snowball, Jen D., and Markus Mostert. Forthcoming. Dancing with the devil: Formative peer assessment and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development.
   Google Scholar
• Snowball , Jen D. and Sayigh , Elizabeth . 2007 . Using the tutorial system to improve the quality of feedback to students in large class teaching . South African Journal of Higher Education , 21 ( 2 ) : 321 – 333 .
   Google Scholar
• Topping , Keith J. 1998 . Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities . Review of Educational Research , 68 ( 3 ) : 249 – 276 . doi: 10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman , Philip . 2009 . Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 34 ( 2 ) : 221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar