Strategies that challenge: exploring the use of differentiated assessment to challenge high-achieving students in large enrolment undergraduate cohorts

References

• Altbach, P.G., L. Reisberg and L.E. Rumbley 2009. Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conferene on Higher Education, edited by Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2009. Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and classroom learning.” Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5(1): 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B.S., and M.D. Engelhart,E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. 2006. Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., P. Noonan, H. Nugent, and B. Scales. 2008. Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., and Z. F. Gamson. 1987. “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.” AAHE Bulletin 39(7): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• James, R. 2012. Social inclusion in a globalised higher education environment: The issue of equitable access to university in Australia. In Social inclusion and higher education, ed. T.N. Basit and S. Tomlinson, 83–108. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. 2005. “How to use thinking skills to differentiate curricula for gifted and highly creative students.” In Teaching strategies in gifted education, edited by S. K. Johnsen and J. Kendrick, 39–50. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kift, S.M., and R.M., Field 2009. Intentional first year curriculum design as a means of facilitating student engagement: some exemplars. Paper presented at the 12th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Townsville, Queensland, 29 June–1 July 2009. http://www.fyhe.com.au/past_papers/papers09/content/pdf/16D.pdf (accessed February 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• McBride, B. 2004. “Data-driven instructional methods: ‘One-strategy-fits-all’ doesn’t work in real classrooms.” Technological Horizons in Education Journal 31(11): 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, J., N. Todd, H. Huijser, and G. Tehan. 2012. “Building pathways to academic success: A practise report.” The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 3(1): 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., and J. L. Brown. 2005. “Differentiated instruction and educational standards: Is détente possible?” Theory into Practice 44(3): 234–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2009. Transforming assessment and feedback: enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. Glasgow: Quality Assurance Agency (Scotland) www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/firstyear/.
   Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., and C. A. Tomlinson. 2008. “The application of differential instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20(3): 307–323.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. 1999. “Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69(1): 21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subban, P. 2006. A research basis supporting differentiated instruction. Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. November Adelaidehttp://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/sub06080.pdf (accessed February 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. 2009. Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of university. Keynote speech delivered at the ALTC FYE Curriculum Design Symposium, Queensland University of Technology. Brisbane, Australia, February 5 http://www.docser.com/QUT-ALTC-Speech-2009–2309484 (accessed February 20, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. 1999. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. 2001. How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward-Kron, R. 2003. “Critical analysis and the journal article review assignment.” Prospect 18(2): 20–36.
   Google Scholar