Improving engagement: the use of ‘Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience

References

• Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2007. “Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32(2): 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., and A. Valtcheva. 2009. “Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment.” Theory into Practice 48(1): 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2009. Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Documents/PDF/Additional%20Report%20-%20Transforming%20Aus%20Higher%20ED_webaw.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. William. 1998. “Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 80: 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer-assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29(6): 721–733.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the promotion of academic values.” Studies in Higher Education 15(1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22(2): 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2010. Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. “Peer learning and assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24(4): 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov 2005. Redesigning assessment for learning beyond higher education. In Higher Education in a Changing World. Proceedings of the 28th HERDSA Annual Conference, July 3–6, in Sydney, Australia. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., P. Noonan, H. Nugent, and B. Scales 2008. Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Review/Documents/PDF/Higher%20Education%20Review_one%20document_02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S., A. M. Cantwell, and R. A. Hanneman. 2008. “The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement.” Research in Higher Education 49: 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. 2005. “Induction of teachers into 21st century learning communities: Creating the next generation of educational practice.” The New Educator 1(3): 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, N., P. Davies, and R. Skeers 2005. Self-and peer-assessment in software engineering project. Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Conference on Computing Education, in Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., M. Valcke, and I. Roozen. 2012. “How effective are self- and-peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers assessment?” Active Learning in Higher Education 13(2): 129–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., and L. McDowell. 1997. “Introduction: Assessment as a tool for learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 23(4): 279–298.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. “The use of self-, peer-and co-assessment in higher education: A review.” Studies in Higher Education 24: 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G., and D. B. Denison. 2001. “Quality assessment of university students: Student perceptions of quality criteria.” The Journal of Higher Education 72(4): 478–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., and V. Klenowsky. 2002. “Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27(3): 243–256.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 1986. “Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 11: 146–166.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and D. Boud. 1989. “Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 59(4): 395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and K. Thomson. 2008. “Assessment: What drives innovation?” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 5(1): 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K., I. Yoon, and C. Lee 2005. Induction into learning communities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, G. 2009. “Why assessment?.” Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture 10 (1): 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, J., and P. Hafner. 2003. “Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating.” International Journal of Science Education 25(12): 1509–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S. J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views.” Higher Educational Research and Development 20(1): 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2003. Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, in Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• James, R., C. McInnis, and M. Devlin. 2002. Assessing learning in Australian Universities. The University of Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. 2006. “Editorial: Learning oriented assessment in the Asia Pacific region.” Assessment in Education 13(2): 131–134.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprianou, I., and J. Athanasou. 2009. A teacher’s guide to educational assessment. Revised edition ed. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., and D. Boud. 2003. “The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 10(2): 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw-Hill. 2008. 21st century approach: Preparing students for the global workplace. CTB McGraw-Hill. http://www.ctb.com/ctb.com/control/researchArticleMainAction?topicId=429&articleId=469&p=ctbResearch.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, R. J., and J. K. Earl. 2008. “Accuracy in self-assessment: The role of ability, feedback, self-efficacy and goal orientation.” Australian Journal of Career Development 17(3): 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, G. 2010. “Designing induction as professional learning community.” The Educational Forum 74 (4): 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., and H. Sullivan 2007. “Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self-and peer-evaluators.” Education Technology Research and Development. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raban, R., and A. Litchfield. 2007. “Supporting peer-assessment of individual contributions in groupwork.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23(1): 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, W. 2001. “Autonomy at all cost: An ethnography of metacognitive self-assessment and self-management among experienced language learners.” The Modern Language Journal 85(2): 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers, M., F. Dochy, and E. Cascallar 2003. “The era of assessment engineering: Changing perspectives on teaching and learning and the role of new modes of assessment.” In Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards, edited by M. Segers and E.A. Dordrecht, 1–12 Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. 2004. “Learning management systems: The wrong place to start learning.” http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/lms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K., and J. Terry 2008. Fostering students’ self-assessment skills for sustainable learning. In Sustainability in higher education: Directions for change, Edu-Com 2008 International Conference, November 19–21, in Khon Kaen, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., T. A. Kinderman, and C. J. Furrer. 2009. “A motivational perspective on engagement and diaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioural and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 69(3): 493–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L.A. 2000. “The Role of Assessment in Learning Culture.” Educational Researcher 29 (7): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings, V., and C. Tascione. 1996. “Student self-assessment and self-evaluation.” Mathematics Teacher 89: 548–555.
   Google Scholar
• Stembourg, R.J. 2008. “Assessing What Matters.” The Best of Educational Leadership 2007–2008, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. 2001. Student-involved classroom assessment. 3rd ed. New Jersey, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tait-McCutcheon, S., and B. Sherley 2006. In the hands of the learner: The impact of self-assessment on teacher education. MERGA 2006 Conference Proceedings, 353–59, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. A. 2008. “Assessment in first year university: A model to manage transition.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 5(1): 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., D. Martin, and K. Pleasants. 2011. “Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future learning in higher education.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 8(1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer-assessment between students in colleges and universities.” Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2007. “Trends in peer learning.” Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Psychology 25(6): 631–645.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T.T., and Dall’Alba G. 2008. “Exploring an authentic approach to assessment to enhance student learning. In Re-imagining higher education pedagogies.” Proceedings of the AARE Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. 1998. Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Portland: Calendar Islands.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Zariski, A. 1996. “Student peer-assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice.” In Teaching and learning within and across disciplines, edited by Abbott and Willcoxson, 189–200 Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar