Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment

References

• Archbald, D., and F. M. Newmann. 1988. Beyond Standardized Tests: Assessing Authentic Achievement in the Secondary School. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Qualifications Framework. July 2011. Accessed October 08, 2012. http://www.aqf.edu.au/Portals/0/Documents/Handbook/AustQuals%20FrmwrkFirstEditionJuly2011_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berlak, H. 1992. “The Need for a New Science of Assessment.” In Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and Assessment, edited by H. Berlak. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1995. “Assessment and Learning: Contradictory or Complementary?” In Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, edited by P. T. Knight, 35–48. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., J. Bull, and M. Pendlebury. 1997. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and M. Craig. 2004. “Assessment of Authentic Learning.” Accessed September 13, 2012. http://www.coe.missouri.edu/~vlib/glenn.michelle’s.stuff/GLEN3MIC
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and P. Knight. 1994. “Assessing Learners in Higher Education.” In Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, edited by J. Stephenson. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, G. 2009. “Towards Authentic E-Assessment Tasks.” In EdMedia World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009, edited by G. Siemens and C. Fulford, 1585–1590. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Custer, R. L. 2000. Using Authentic Assessment in Vocational Education. Information Series No. 381. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education: Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., J. Biggs, and N. Purdie. 1996. “Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66(2): 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., and A. Herrington. 2006. “Authentic Conditions for Authentic Assessment: Aligning Task and Assessment.” In Research and Development in Higher Education, edited by A. Bunker and I. Vardi, 146–151. Milperra, NSW: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., T. C. Reeves, and R. Oliver. 2010. A Guide to Authentic E-Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendle, A. and M. Northcote. 2000. “The Struggle for Balance in the Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Online Assessment Tasks.” Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Coffs Harbour: ASCILITE.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, K. H., C. Tan, and P. T. Ng. 2012. “Creating Thinking Schools Through Authentic Assessment: The Case in Singapore.” Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accreditation 24: 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebow, D., and W. W. Wager. 1994. “Authentic Activity as a Model for Appropriate Learning Activity: Implications for Emerging Instructional Technologies.” Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 23(3): 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, J. 1997. “Authentic Assessment: Its Development and Applications.” Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance 68(7): 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., and T. C. Reeves. 2012. Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, H. 1994. “Situated Learning: Continuing the Conversation.” Educational Technology 34(10): 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, N. M., and D. D. Nulty. 2009. “How to Use (Five) Curriculum Design Principles to Align Authentic Learning Environments, Assessment, Students’ Approached to Thinking and Learning Outcomes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(5): 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., H. M. Marks, and A. Gamoran. 1996. “Authentic Pedagogy and Student Performance.” American Journal of Education 104(4): 280–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., and G. G. Wehlage. 1993. “Five Standards of Authentic Instruction.” Educational Leadership 50(7): 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcote, M. 2002. “Online Assessment: Friend, Foe or Fix?” British Journal of Educational Technology 33(5): 623–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcote, M. 2003. “Online Assessment in Higher Education: The Influence of Pedagogy on The Construction Of Students’ Epistemologies.” Issues In Educational Research 13 (1): 66–84. http://www.iier.org.au/iier13/northcote.html
   Google Scholar
• Race, P., S. Brown, and B. Smith. 2005. 500 Tips on Assessment. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. C. 2006. “Design Research from a Technology Perspective.” In Educational Design Research, edited by J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney and N. Nieveen, 52–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. E. 1997. “The Long (Suit) and the Short (Comings) of Authentic Assessment.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 49th, Phoenix, AZ, February 26–March 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. 1993. Assessing Student Performance – Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar