Assessment and teaching of science skills: whole of programme perceptions of graduating students

References

• Adams, S. 2004. “Learning Outcomes: A Consideration of the Nature, Role, Application and Implications for European Education of Employing ‘Learning Outcomes’ at the Local, National and International Levels.” www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/25725/0028779.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, G. 1999. “College Impact on Student Learning: Comparing the Use of Self-Reported Gains, Standardised Test Scores, and College Grades.” Research in Higher Educatio 40 (5): 499–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. A., U. Banerjee, C. L. Drennan, S. C. R. Elgin, I. R. Epstein, J. Handelsman, G. F. Hatfull, et al. 2011. “Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities.” Science 331: 152–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aurora, T. S. 2010. “Enhancing Learning by Writing Laboratory Reports in Class.” The Journal of Faculty Development 2 (1): 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bedggood, R. E., and J. D. Donovan. 2012. “University Performance Evaluations: What are We Really Measuring?” Studies in Higher Education 37 (7): 825–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., D. Duchon, and W. H. Pallett. 2013. “Validity of Student Self-Reported Ratings of Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. 2006. Thirteen Strategies to Measure College Teaching. Sterling: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., and S. Cutler. 2010. “Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (4): 355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1995. “Assessment and Learning: Contradictory or Ccomplementary?” In Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, edited by P. Knight. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. 2011. “Validity of College Self-Reported Gains at Diverse Institutions.” Educational Reseacher 40 (1): 22–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 2009. Review of Education in Mathematics, Data Science and Quantitative Disciplines:Report to the Group of Eight Universities. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., and S. Richardson. 2011. “An International Assessment of Bachelor Degree Graduates’ Learning Outcomes.” Higher Education Management and Policy 23 (3): 51–69.
   Google Scholar
• de la Harpe, B., and C. David. 2012. “Major Influences on the Teaching and Assessment of Graduate Attributes.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (4): 493–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, N., T. Loveday, and H. Dalton. 2010. “Student Evaluation of Courses: What Predicts Satisfaction?” Higher Education Research & Development 29 (4): 339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, J. A., G. Thomson, and C. M. Zhao. 2012. “The Learning Outcomes Race: The Value of Self-Reported Gains in Large Research Universities.” Higher Education 64: 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewan, C. 2009. Learning and Teaching in Australian Universities: A Thematic Analysis of Cycle 1 AUQA Audits. Australian Universities Quality Agency and the Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S. P., and A. M. Bosanquet. 2006. “The Curriculum? That’s Just a Unit Outline, Isn’t It?” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 269–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and H. Dunbar-Goddet. 2009. “Characterising Programme-Level Assessment Environments that Support Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (4): 481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handal, G., P. Lauvhs, and K. Lycke. 1990. “The Concept of Rationality in Academic Science Teaching.” European Journal of Education 25: 319–332.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., D. Ebeert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Change, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, et al. 2004. “Scientific Teaching.” Science 304: 521–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, M., P. H. Snedden, F. M. Al-Ahmadi, and N. Reid. 2009. “The Perceptions, Views and Opinions of University Physics Students About Physics Learning During Undergraduate Laboratory Work.” European Journal of Physics 30: 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. April 2012. A Background in Science; What Science Means for Australian Society. University of Melbourne Commissioned Report Prepared for the Australian Council of Deans of Science. Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, S. J. 2004. “Chemistry is NOT a Laboratory Science.” Journal of Chemical Education 81 (9): 1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, S. 2011. “Gauging Academic Growth of Bachelor Degree Recipients: Longitudinal vs. Self-reported Gain in General Education.” New Directions for Institutional Research 150: 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., and S. Barrie. 2010. “Influences on the Assessment of Graduate Attributes in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 325–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., F. Campbell, and J. Westwood. 2012. “Oral Versus Written Assessments: A Test of Student Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (1): 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. 1997. “Chemistry Teaching – Science or Alchemy? 1996 Brasted Lecture.” Journal of Chemical Education 74 (3): 262–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joughin, G. 2007. “Student Conceptions of Oral Presentations.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (3): 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., and P. Ewell. 2010. “The State of Learning Outcomes in the United States.” Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., and J. S. Stark. 2011. Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Context. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, M., A. Kinnear, M. Boyce, and I. Bennett. 2004. “Student and Staff Perceptions of the Importance of Generic Skills in Science.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K., and Y. Hodgson. 2012. “The Science Students Skills Inventory: Capturing Graduate Perceptions of their Learning Outcomes.” International Journal of Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education 20 (1): 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• McNaught, C., S. Ng, and H. Chow. 2012. “Literacties in the Humanities: The Student Voice.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (2): 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, H. P., H. Scicluna, P. Boyle, M. Grimm, K. Gibson, and P. Jones. 2012. “Successful Development of Generic Capabilities in an Undergraduate Medical Education Program.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (4): 525–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2007. “E-Assessment by Design: Using Multiple-Choice Tests to Good Effect.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (1): 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2002. “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning – How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Departmental Assessment Strategies and Learner Centred Assessment Practices?” Active Learning in Higher Education 3 (2): 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. 1998. “The Influence of Assessment Method on Students’ Learning Approaches: Multiple-Choice Question Examination Versus Assignment Essay.” Higher Education 35 (4): 453–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1988. “The Validity of Student Ratings.” Instructional Research 92 (2): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, D., M. Riddle, and B. Knewstubb. 2012. “Curriculum Mapping to Embed Graduate Capabilities.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (2): 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradling, C., L. Soh, and C. Ansorge. 2008. “Ethics Training and Decision-Making: Do Computer Science Programs Need Help?” Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 153–157. Portland, OR: SIGCSE.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J., and J. Goodfellow. 2004. “Identifying Generic Skills Through Curriculum Mapping: A Critical Evaluation.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 329–346.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq, V. N., E. M. Scott, A. C. Cochrane, M. Lee, and L. Rypes. 2004. “Auditing and Mapping Key Skills Within University Curricula.” Quality Assurance in Education 12 (22): 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., D. Lalancette, and D. Roseveare. 2012. “Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes. Feasibility Study Report.” Design and Implementation 1. http://www.oecd.org/edu/highereducationandadultlearning/AHELOFSReportVolume1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. E. 2007. “Why Not Try a Scientific Approach to Science Education?” Change 39: 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. B. 2009. “Revising the AP Biology Curriculum.” Science 325: 1627–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, B., S. Jones, and J. Kelder. 2011. Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Project Science. Final Report. http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-learning-and-teaching-academic-standards-sciecne-2011..
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., and L. Harvey. 2005. “Graduate Attributes and Their Development.” New Directions for Institutional Research 128: 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., and P. T. Knight. 2006. “Curricula for Economic and Social Gain.” Higher Education 51 (4): 565–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar