The concept of ‘originality’ in the Ph.D.: how is it interpreted by examiners?

References

• AQFC (Australian Qualifications Framework Council). 2013. Australian Qualifications Framework [Online]. 2nd ed. South Australia: Australian Qualifications Framework Council. Accessed April 8, 2013. http://www.aqf.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Bologna Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks. 2005. A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Copenhagen: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Appendix 8. http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/050218_QF_EHEA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, S., and A. Holbrook. 2013. “Examining PhD and Research Masters Theses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (4): 407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals. 1988. The British Ph.D. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 2000. The Doctoral Experience: Success and Failure in Graduate School. New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denicolo, P. M. 2003. “Assessing the PhD: A Constructive View of Criteria.” Quality Assurance in Education 11 (2): 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• European Universities Association. 2006. “Conclusions from Bologna Seminar on Doctoral Programmes.” Nice, December 7–9, 2006 (2.3 Access and admission).
   Google Scholar
• International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2011. Standards for Doctoral Degrees in the Molecular Biosciences: Recommendations of the Committee on Education of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Accessed December 9, 2013. http://www.iubmb.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=uploads/media&file=uploads/media/Standards_for_the_Doctoral_Degrees.pdf&t=138670816&hash=fc421cd86bec8309dfd27819ef24ddf93ad45f44.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. 1997. “Examining the Examiners: An Analysis of Examiners’ Reports on Doctoral Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 22 (3): 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. 2007. Making the Implicit Explicit: Creating Performance Expectations for the Dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, G., and M. Kiley. 2002. “‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How Experienced Examiners Assess Research Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P. 1984. “Examination of Research Theses.” Higher Education Research & Development 3 (2): 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, K. 1994. Changing Doctoral Degrees: An International Perspective. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostriker, J. P., P. W. Holland, C. V. Kuh, and J. A. Voytuk (eds.). 2010. A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate programmes in the United States Committee to Assess Research – Doctorate Programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). 2001. Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Scotland. Gloucester: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). 2006. Discussion Paper about Doctoral Programmes [Online: Archived Publication]. Accessed July 14, 2013. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Discussion-paper-about-doctoral-programmes.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• QAA (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education). 2008. Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Gloucester: QAA.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P., and C. Jackson. 2000. “Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD Examination Process in Britain.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (2): 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P., and C. Jackson. 2004. The Doctoral Examination Process. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, S. 1999. What is a PhD? Towards a Discussion Paper. Higher Education Development Centre: Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. E., C. M. Golde, L. Jones, Bueschel A. Conklin, and P. Hutchings. 2008. The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-first Century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. J., and F. Vella. 2000. “IUBMB updates Ph.D. Standards.” BioEssays 22 (8): 771–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar