Online student evaluations of teaching: what are we sacrificing for the affordances of technology?

References

• Abrami, P. 1989. “How should We Use Student Ratings to Evaluate Teaching?” Research in Higher Education 30 (2): 221–227.10.1007/BF00992718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami, P., S. D’Apollonia, and P. A. Cohen. 1990. “Validity of Student Ratings of Instructions: What We Know and What We Do Not.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 219–231.10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. D., and P. Umbach. 2012. “Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments.” Research in Higher Education 53 (5): 576–591.10.1007/s11162-011-9240-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., and R. Rosenthal. 1993. “Half a Minute: Predicting Teacher Evaluations from Thin Slices of Nonverbal Behavior and Physical Attractiveness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (3): 431–441.10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardalan, A., R. Ardalan, S. Coppage, and W. Crouch. 2007. “A Comparison of Student Feedback Obtained through Paper-based and Web-based Surveys of Faculty Teaching.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (6): 1085–1101.10.1111/bjet.2007.38.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, R. J., W. K. Bryant, A. Mathios, H. J. Kang, and D. Bell. 2006. “Electronic Course Evaluations: Does an Online Delivery System Influence Student Evaluations?” Journal of Economic Education 37 (1): 21–37.10.3200/JECE.37.1.21-37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., and C. S. Nair. 2010. “A Recipe for Effective Participation Rates for Web-based Surveys.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D. E., and J. M. Lewis. 1994. “Students’ Evaluation of Teaching and Accountability: Implications from the Boyer and the ASA Reports.” Teaching Sociology 22 (2): 195–199.10.2307/1318566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R., J. Higgins, M. Topping, and A. Mortimer. 1983. “An Investigation of the Robustness of the t Test to Unit of Analysis Violations.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 43: 69–80.10.1177/001316448304300110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P. A. 1981. “Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies.” Review of Educational Research 51 (3): 281–309.10.3102/00346543051003281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J., P. Baum, R. W. Hanna, and K. S. Chapman. 2004. “Gathering Faculty Teaching Evaluations by in-class and Online Surveys: Their Effects on Response Rates and Evaluations.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (5): 611–623.10.1080/02602930410001689171
   Google Scholar
• Dresel, M., and K. Tinsner. 2008. “Method Effects of Online Gathered Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness in University Courses.” Zeitschrift Fur Evaluation 7 (2): 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENQA. 2009. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Findlow, S. 2008. “Accountability and Innovation in Higher Education: A Disabling Tension?” Studies in Higher Education 33: 313–329.10.1080/03075070802049285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, J., and D. Ó Donnabháin. 2009. “Strategic Planning and Accountability in Irish Education.” Irish Educational Studies 28 (1): 27–46.10.1080/03323310802597291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A., and G. Gillmore. 1997. “Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings.” American Psychologist 52 (11): 1209–1217.10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamermesh, D., and A. Parker. 2003. Beauty in the Classroom: Professor’s Pulchritude and Putative Pedagogical Productivity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, N. 2003. “Online Ratings: Fact and Fiction.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2003 (96): 31–38.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. 2003. “Student Feedback.” Quality in Higher Education 9 (1): 3–20.10.1080/13538320308164
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. 2000. “The Authority of the Student Evaluation Questionnaire.” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (4): 419–434.10.1080/713699176
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. D. 2003. “Online Student Ratings: Will Students Respond?” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2003 (96): 49–59.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, E. 1978. “Sex Bias in Student Evaluations of College Professors.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 2 (3): 235–243.10.1111/j.1471-6402.1978.tb00505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, E., and I. Mac Labhrainn. 2005. “Obtaining Student Feedback on Teaching & Course Quality: Briefing Paper 2.” Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, NUI Galway, Ireland. Accessed November 7, 2013. http://www.nuigalway.ie/celt/documents/evaluation_ofteaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Layne, B. H., J. R. Decristoforo, and D. Mcginty. 1999. “Electronic versus Traditional Student Ratings of Instruction.” Research in Higher Education 40 (2): 221–232.10.1023/A:1018738731032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckey, J., and N. Neill. 2001. “Quantifying Quality: The Importance of Student Feedback.” Quality in Higher Education 7 (1): 19–32.10.1080/13538320120045058
   Google Scholar
• Liegle, J., and D. Mcdonald. 2005. “Lessons Learned from Online vs. Paper-based Computer Information Students’ Evaluation System.” Information Systems Education Journal 3 (37): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mckeachie, W. J., and M. Kaplan. 1996. “Persistent Problems in Evaluating College Teaching.” AAHE Bulletin 48 (6): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Meinefeld, W. 2010. “Online-surveys for the Evaluation of Teaching at University-convenient and Unreliable.” Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 62 (2): 297–315.10.1007/s11577-010-0098-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S., and N. Kuol. 2005a. “A Punitive Bureaucratic Tool or a Valuable Resource? Using Student Evaluations of Teaching to Enhance your Teaching.” In Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, edited by G. O’Neill, S. Moore and B. McMullin, 141–148. Dublin: All Ireland Society for Higher Education. http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/moore-A_punitive_bureaucratic_tool_or_a_valuable_resource.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., and N. Kuol. 2005b. “Students Evaluating Teachers: Exploring the Importance of Faculty Reaction to Feedback on Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 10 (1): 57–73.10.1080/1356251052000305534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. 2011. “A Comparison of Online versus Traditional Student End-of-course Critiques in Resident Courses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (6): 627–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neath, I. 1996. “How to Improve Your Teaching Evaluations without Improving Your Teaching.” Psychological Reports 78: 1363–1372.10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3c.1363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, C., L. R. Gale, and B. Handley. 2010. “Assessing Faculty Performance Using Student Evaluations of Teaching in an Uncontrolled Setting.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. 2008. “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What can be Done?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ory, J. C. 1991. “Changes in Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education.” Theory into Practice 30 (1): 30–36.10.1080/00405849109543473
   Google Scholar
• Perrett, J. J. 2011. “Exploring Graduate and Undergraduate Course Evaluations Administered on Paper and Online: A Case Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (1): 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Support Unit. 2011. Confidential Report for the Institutional Reviews of Irish Universities. Limerick: University of Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1991. “A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire.” Studies in Higher Education 16 (2): 129–150.10.1080/03075079112331382944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Risquez, A., and S. Moore. 2013. “Exploring Feelings about Technology Integration in Higher Education: Individuation and Congruence.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 26 (2): 326–339.10.1108/09534811311328371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., S. K. Gilmartin, and A. N. Bryant. 2003. “Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education 44 (4): 409–432.10.1023/A:1024232915870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, L., and Z. Kunda. 2000. “Motivated Stereotyping of Women: She’s Fine if She Praised me but Incompetent if she Criticized Me.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (11): 1329–1342.10.1177/0146167200263002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbrekke, T. D., and T. Englund. 2011. “Bringing Professional Responsibility Back in.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (7): 847–861.10.1080/03075079.2010.482205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, D. L., and C. Reiner. 2003. “Charting the Uncharted Seas of Online Student Ratings of Instruction.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2003: 1–24.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R., W. E. Addison, and J. L. Smith. 2011. “Comparison of Online and Classroom-based Student Evaluations of Instruction.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (4): 465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theall, M., and J. L. Franklin. 1990. “Student Ratings in the Context of Complex Evaluation Systems.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1990 (43): 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasco, A. 1980. “Student Perceptions of Instructional and Personality Characteristics of Faculty: A Canonical Analysis.” Teaching of Psychology 7: 79–82.10.1207/s15328023top0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer, L. R., and R. Sehgal. 2006. Online Course Evaluation Analysis Report. Montreal: McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Zabaleta, F. 2007. “The Use and Misuse of Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1): 55–76.10.1080/13562510601102131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar