How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course

References

• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 427–441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Design Principles and Outcomes of Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 341–356. doi:10.1080/03075070600680836.10.1080/03075070600680836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and D. Charney. 2006. “Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novice Peer Reviewers and Subject Matter Experts.” Written Communication 23 (3): 260–294. doi:10.1177/0741088306289261.10.1177/0741088306289261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 2006. “Peer Assessment: Judging the Quality of Students’ Work by Comments Rather than Marks.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 69–82. doi:10.1080/14703290500467566.10.1080/14703290500467566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, R., S. T. Brookes, K. Avery, J. M. Blazeby, and Y. Ben-Shlomo. 2006. “The Effectiveness and Reliability of Peer-marking in First-year Medical Students.” Medical Education 40 (10): 965–972. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02565.x.10.1111/med.2006.40.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, John, and P. Hafner. 2003. “Quantitative Analysis of the Rubric as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Study of Student Peer‐group Rating.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (12): 1509–1528. doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268.10.1080/0950069022000038268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S. J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776.10.1080/07294360123776
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. R. 2011. “Peer Assessment in Large Undergraduate Classes: An Evaluation of a Procedure for Marking Laboratory Reports and a Review of Related Practices.” AJP: Advances in Physiology Education 35 (2): 178–187. doi:10.1152/advan.00115.2010.10.1152/advan.00115.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M. J., L. Pombo, and A. Moreira. 2012. “The Quality of Peer Assessment in a Wiki-based Online Context: A Qualitative Study.” Educational Media International 49 (2): 139–149. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.703426.10.1080/09523987.2012.703426
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., A. Cooper, and L. Lancaster. 2002. “Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 (1): 71–81. doi:10.1080/13558000110102904.10.1080/13558000110102904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. A. J. 1994. “Peer, Self and Tutor Assessment: Relative Reliabilities.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (1): 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are they Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., C. S. Lin, C. L. Lee, and K. E. Chang. 2003. “Evaluating Proposals for Experiments: An Application of Web-based Self-assessment and Peer Assessment.” Teaching of Psychology 30 (4): 331–334. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06.10.1207/S15328023TOP3004_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2010. “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 339–343. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/713611428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankulov, K., and R. Couto. 2012. “Peer Review in Class: Metrics and Variations in a Senior Course.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 40 (3): 161–168. doi:10.1002/bmb.20592.10.1002/bmb.20592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., D. Sluijsmans, and J. van Merriënboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar