Cognitive styles in admission procedures for assessing candidates of architecture

References

• Adewale, P. O., and O. B. Adhuze. 2014. “Entry Qualifications and Academic Performance of Architecture Students in Nigerian Polytechnics: Are the Admission Requirements Still Relevant?” Frontiers of Architectural Research 3: 69–75.10.1016/j.foar.2013.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Allinson, C. W., and J. Hayes. 2012. The Cognitive Style Index: Technical Manual and User Guide. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S. 2006. “Factors Influencing Successful Achievement in Contrasting Design and Technology Activities in Higher Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 16: 193–213.10.1007/s10798-004-8320-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausburn, L. J., and F. B. Ausburn. 1978. “Cognitive Style: Some Information and Implications for Instructional Design.” Education Communication and Technology Journal 26: 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova, O., and M. Kozhevnikov. 2009. “The New Object Spatial Verbal Cognitive Style Model: Theory and Measurement.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 23: 638–663.10.1002/acp.v23:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, H., E. Yi-Luen Do, and C. M. Zimring. 2010. “Extended Linkography and Distance Graph in Design Evaluation: An Empirical Study of the Dual Effects of Inspiration Sources in Creative Design.” Design Studies 31: 146–168.10.1016/j.destud.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvino, I. 1997. Invisible Cities. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., and P. Badke-Schaub. 2011. “The Influence of Different Pictorial Representations during Idea Generation.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 45: 130–146.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. 2004. “Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Strategy in the Design Process: Expert versus Novice Performance.” Journal of Design Research on Design Expertise 4 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. 2005. “Design Aided by Visual Displays: A Cognitive Approach.” The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22: 250–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. 2010. “Visual Analogy, Visual Displays, and the Nature of Design Problems: The Effect of Expertise.” Environmental Planning and Design: Design B 37: 170–188.10.1068/b35073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., N. Davidovitch, and R. Milgram. 2010. “Creative Thinking as a Predictor of Creative Problem Solving in Architectural Design Students.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4: 31–35.10.1037/a0016965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., and G. Goldschmidt. 1999. “Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education.” Design Studies 20: 153–175.10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., and G. Goldschmidt. 2000. “Reasoning by Visual Analogy in Design Problem-solving: The Role of Guidance.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27: 105–119.10.1068/b2565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaigneau, S. E., L. W. Barsalou, and M. Zamani. 2009. “Situational Information Contributes to Object Categorization and Inference.” Acta Psychologica 130: 81–94.10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 2006. Dual System Theories of Cognition: Some Issues. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E. S. 1977. “The Mind’s Eye: Nonverbal Thought in Technology.” Science 197: 827–836.10.1126/science.197.4306.827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., G. Carter, and T. Jordan. 1978. “Cognitive Styles, Personality Factors Problem‐solving Skills and Teaching Approach in Electrical Engineering.” Assessment in Higher Education 3: 86–121.10.1080/0260293780030201
   Google Scholar
• Gigi, A. 2006. Do People with Varying Cognitive Style Access Semantic Knowledge Differently? The Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gigi, A. forthcoming. Validation of Categorization Test Used to Determine Cognitive Style.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. 1994. “On Visual Design Thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture.” Design Studies 15: 158–174.10.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-1
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. 1995. “Visual Displays for Design: Imagery, Analogy and Databases of Visual Images.” In Visual Databases in Architecture, edited by A. Koutamanis, H. Timmermans, and I. Vermeulen, 53–74. Avebury: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. 2011. “Inspiring Design Ideas with Texts.” Design Studies 32: 139–155.10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., R. Sebba, C. Oren, and A. Cohen. 2001. “Who Should Be a Designer?: Controlling Admission into Schools of Architecture”. Paper Presented at the Designing in Context, DTRS5 conference, Delft, October 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves M., C. Cardoso, and P. Badke-Schaub. 2011. Around You: How Designers Get Inspired. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, Copenhagen, August 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. 1962. “Creativity: Its Measurement and Development.” In A Source Book for Creative Thinking, edited by S. Parnes and H. Harding, 151–168. New York: Charles Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. 1967. The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P., and R. Hoefner. 1966. Structure of Intellect Factors and Their Tests. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Psychological Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hannington, B. 2003. “Methods in the Making: A Perspective on the State of Human Research in Design.” Design Issues 19: 9–18.10.1162/074793603322545019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., and C. W. Allinson. 1994. “Cognitive Style and Its Relevance for Management Practice.” British Journal of Management 5: 53–71.10.1111/bjom.1994.5.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Hong, E., and R. Milgram. 2010. “Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity.” Creativity Research Journal 22: 272–287.10.1080/10400419.2010.503535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jubilo, A. B., and Faller, E. M. 2013. “Index of Learning Styles of Engineering and Architecture Students for SY 2011-2012”. Proceedings of the IETEC’13 Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. S. 1951. “A Personal World through Perception.” In Perception: An Approach to Personality, edited by R. R. Blacke and G. V. Ramsey, 328–355. New York: Ronald Press.10.1037/11505-000
   Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. 2007. “Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style.” Psychological Bulletin 133: 464–481.10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., M. Hegarty, and R. E. Mayer. 2002. “Revising the Visualizer–Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers.” Cognition and Instruction 20: 47–78.10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., S. Kosslyn, and J. Shepherd. 2005. “Spatial versus Object Visualizers: A New Characterization of Visual Cognitive Style.” Memory and Cognition 33: 710–726.10.3758/BF03195337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindauer, M. S. 1983. “Imagery and the Arts.” In Imagery: Current Theory, Research and Application, edited by A. A. Sheihk, 468–506. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lodder, C. 1985. Russian Constructivism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, R. 2006. “How Sketching Can Affect the Idea Generation Process in Design Group Meetings.” Design Studies 26: 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaga, R. A. 2000. “The Effect of Stimulus Modes and Associative Distance in Individual Creativity Support Systems.” Decision Support Systems 29: 125–141.10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00067-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1976. “Personality Consistencies in Cognition and Creativity.” In Individuality in Learning, edited by S. Messick, 4–23. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1984. “The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice.” Educational Psychologist 19: 59–74.10.1080/00461528409529283
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. T. 1970. “Creativity and the Prediction of Success in Architecture.” Journal of Architectural Education 24: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B., W. Stroebe, and H. Lodewijkx. 2002. “Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 535–544.10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00500-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, I. 1956. A Preliminary Study of the Prediction of Academic Success in Architecture. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Oluigbo, S. 2005. “Improving the Quality of Architecture Graduates from Nigerian Universities.” AARCHES Journal 4: 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and Verbal Processes. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia, F., and A. Moe. 2013. “Cognitive Styles and Mental Rotation Ability in Map Learning.” Cognitive Processing 14: 391–399.10.1007/s10339-013-0572-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pektas, S. T. 2014. “Correlations between the Visualizer/Imager Cognitive Style and Achievement in Digital Modeling Tasks.” Proceedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 5053–5057.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1072
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., R. J. Mumaw, and V. J. Shute. 1985. “Analyses of Spatial Aptitude and Expertise.” In Test design: Contributions from psychology, education and psychometrics, edited by S. Embretson, 45–76. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-238180-5.50007-0
   Google Scholar
• Perttula, M., and P. Sipila. 2007. “The Idea Exposure Paradigm in Design Idea Generation.” Journal of Engineering Design 18: 93–102.10.1080/09544820600679679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., and A. Staley. 1998. “Self-perception as Learner, Cognitive Style and Business Studies Students’ Course Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23: 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. 2006. “Cognitive Styles and Student Progression in Architectural Design Education.” Design Studies 27: 167–181.10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. 2007. “Predictors of Future Performance in Architectural Design Education.” Educational Psychology 27: 447–463.10.1080/01443410601104361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, H. S. 1987. “Visual Artists and Imagery.” Imagination, Cognition and Personality 7: 77–93.10.2190/AVJ5-N24B-P7MC-HR4R
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Present Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34: 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E., and B. Badger. 1998. “Cognitive Style, Learning and Innovation.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10: 247–265.10.1080/09537329808524314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E., and R. Riding. 1999. “Cognitive Style and Instructional Preferences.” Instructional Science 27: 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., and L. F. Zhang. 2001. “Thinking Styles across Cultures: Their Relationships with Student Learning.” In Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles, edited by R. J. Sternberg and L. F. Zhang, 227–247. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Streufert, S., and G. Y. Nogami. 1989. “Cognitive Style and Complexity: Implications for I/O Psychology.” In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by C. L. Cooper and I. Robertson, 93–143. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., and A. Ortony. 1989. “Similarity and Analogical Reasoning: A Synthesis.” In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, edited by S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511529863
   Google Scholar
• Waks, L. J. 1999. “Reflective Practice in the Design Studio and Teacher Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies. 31: 303–316.10.1080/002202799183142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingler, H. M. 1969. The Bauhaus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A., C. A. Moore, D. R. Goodenough, and P. W. Cox. 1977. “Field-dependent and Field-independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications.” Review of Educational Research 47: 1–64.10.3102/00346543047001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G. 2014. “Are All Admission Sub-tests Created Equal? – Evidence from a National Key University in China.” China Economic Review 30: 600–617.10.1016/j.chieco.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., and N. D’Souza. 2009. “Different Visual Cognitive Styles, Different Problem Solving Style?” Paper Presented at the IASDR09, International Association of Societies for Design Research. Seoul, October 19–22.
   Google Scholar