Can you increase teacher engagement with evaluation simply by improving the evaluation system?

References

• Bamber, V., and S. Anderson. 2012. “Evaluating Learning and Teaching: Institutional Needs and Individual Practices.” International Journal for Academic Development 17 (1): 5–18.10.1080/1360144X.2011.586459
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., and W. E. Cashin. 2012. Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of Research and Literature. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/idea-paper_50.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, T. N., and J. L. Rokosh. 2009. “Instructors’ Perspectives on the Utility of Student Ratings of Instruction.” Instructional Science 37 (2): 171–184.10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, S., and M. Kim. 2012. “A Socio-technical Approach to Knowledge Contribution Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of Social Networking Sites Users.” International Journal of Information Management 32 (2): 118–126.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crews, T. B., and D. F. Curtis. 2011. “Online Course Evaluations: Faculty Perspective and Strategies for Improved Response Rates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (7): 865–878.10.1080/02602938.2010.493970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J., P. Baum, R. W. Hanna, and K. S. Chapman. 2004. “Gathering Faculty Teaching Evaluations by in-Class and Online Surveys: Their Effects on Response Rates and Evaluations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (5): 611–623.10.1080/02602930410001689171
   Google Scholar
• Edström, K. 2008. “Doing Course Evaluation as If Learning Matters Most.” Higher Education Research and Development 27 (2): 95–106.10.1080/07294360701805234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems.” Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonyea, N. E., and J. M. Gangi. 2012. “Reining in Student Comments: A Model for Categorising and Studying Online Student Comments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (1): 45–55.10.1080/02602938.2010.494403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., P. M. Lyon, and C. Henderson-Smart. 2007. “Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Responses to Student Evaluation in a Problem-based Medical Program.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (2): 143–157.10.1080/02602930600801894
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Development Centre. 2010. HEDC Evaluation Service Survey 2010. http://hedc.otago.ac.nz/hedc/teaching/evaluating-your-teaching/forms-and-resources/.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., D. Y. P. Leung, and K. P. Kwan. 2002. “Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27: 411–425.10.1080/0260293022000009294
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, E. 2006. “The Story of Socio-technical Design: Reflections on Its Successes, Failures and Potential.” Information Systems Journal 16 (4): 317–342.10.1111/isj.2006.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, J. 2000. “Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality? Academics’ Perceptions of Quality Assurance and Quality Monitoring.” Quality in Higher Education 6 (2): 153–163.10.1080/713692740
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. 2008. “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 301–314.10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ory, J. C., and K. Ryan. 2001. “How Do Student Ratings Measure up to a New Validity Framework?” New Directions for Institutional Research 2001 (109): 27–44.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-075X
   Google Scholar
• Penny, A. R., and R. Coe. 2004. “Effectiveness of Consultation on Student Ratings Feedback: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 74 (2): 215–253.10.3102/00346543074002215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienties, B. 2014. “Understanding Academics’ Resistance towards (Online) Student Evaluation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (8): 987–1001.10.1080/02602938.2014.880777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S., and M. H. Jarrahi. 2014. “Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems.” In Computing Handbook, Third Edition: Information Systems and Information Technology. 3rd ed., edited by H. Topi and A. Tucker, 5.1–5.27. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2008. “Building Effectiveness in Teaching through Targeted Evaluation and Response: Connecting Evaluation to Teaching Improvement in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5): 517–533.10.1080/02602930701698942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, S. J., D. Spiller, S. Terry, T. K. Harris, L. Deaker, and J. Kennedy. 2012. Unlocking the Impact of Tertiary Teacher’s Perceptions of Student Evaluation. http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/group-3987/unlocking-the-impact-of-tertiary-teachers-perceptions-of-student-evaluations-of-teaching.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, S. J., D. Spiller, S. Terry, T. Harris, L. Deaker, and J. Kennedy. 2013. “Tertiary Teachers and Student Evaluations: Never the Twain Shall Meet?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 892–904.10.1080/02602938.2013.767876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, B. 2006. The Use of Interpolated Median in Institutional Research. Chicago, IL: Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum. May.
   Google Scholar