Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria

References

• Baird, J., J. Greatorex, and J. F. Bell. 2004. “What Makes Marking Reliable? Experiments with UK Examinations.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (3): 331–348. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304627.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, D., M. Yorke, and M. Coffey. 2004. “What is Happening When We Assess, and How Can We Use Our Understanding of This to Improve Assessment?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 451–477. doi:10.1080/02602930310001689037.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., R. Mladenovic, and M. Price. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of Marking Guides, Grade Descriptors and Annotated Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 769–788. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.714738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., P. Boyd, and S. Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., B. den Outer, J. Hudson, and M. Price. Forthcoming. “External Peer Review of Assessment: An Effective Approach to Verifying Standards?” Higher Education Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, B. 2003. What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, V. 2008. “Exploring the Nature of Examiner Thinking During the Process of Examination Marking.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (2): 247–264. doi:10.1080/03057640802063486.
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2001. “I Know a 2:1 When I See It: Understanding Criteria for Degree Classifications in Franchised University Programmes.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 25 (3): 301–313. doi:10.1080/03098770126527.
   Google Scholar
• Fransella, F., D. Bannister, and R. Bell. 2003. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., K. Purnell, and R. Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality Through Substantive Conversations Between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1080/02602930601125681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greatorex, J. 2000. “Is the Glass Half Full or Half Empty? What Examiners Really Think of Candidates’ Achievement.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff, September 7–10, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, L., and D. Clewes. 2000. “Marking the Difference: An Investigation of the Criteria Used for Assessing Undergraduate Dissertations in a Business School.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/713611416.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, I. P., J. Joyce, and T. Hassall. 2014. “Assessment in Higher Education: The Potential for a Community of Practice to Improve Inter-marker Reliability.” Accounting Education 23 (6): 542–561. doi:10.1080/09639284.2014.974195.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. 2000. Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, K., and P. Docherty. 2011. “Reducing Variation in the Assessment of Student Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 109–124. doi:10.1080/02602930903215842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. A., and A. Schutz. 2001. “Educational Standards, Assessment, and the Search for Consensus.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 37–70. doi:10.3102/00028312038001037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, S. R., and G. Wigglesworth. 2014. “Who’s Marking My Essay? The Assessment of Non-native-speaker and Native-speaker Undergraduate Essays in an Australian Higher Education Context.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.896890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrell, J. 2008. “Assessment Beyond Belief: The Cognitive Process of Grading.” In Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education, edited by A. Havnes and L. McDowell, 251–263. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2005. “Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1080/02602930500063793.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B., B. Francis, and J. Robson. 2005. “Gender, Bias, Assessment and Feedback: Analyzing the Written Assessment of Undergraduate History Essays.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 241–260. doi:10.1080/02602930500063827.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminancy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, S. 2005. “The Assessment of Complex Tasks: A Double Reading.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (6): 663–679. doi:10.1080/03075070500339988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and K. Coombe. 2006. “Quality and Qualms in the Marking of University Assignments by Sessional Staff: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education 51 (1): 45–69. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6376-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, J., and K. Ecclestone. 1999. “Litigation and Learning: Tensions in Improving University Lecturers’ Assessment Practice.” Assessment in Education 6 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1080/09695949992801.
   Google Scholar
• Watty, K., M. Freeman, B. Howieson, P. Hancock, B. O’Connell, P. de Lange, and A. Abraham. 2013. “Social Moderation, Assessment and Assuring Standards for Accounting Graduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (4): 461–478. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.848336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, F., D. Pepper, and A. Jenkins. 2000. “Assessing the Undergraduate Dissertation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (1): 71–80. doi:10.1080/02602930050025042.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. 1995. Competence-based Assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 2008. Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education: Signals and Shortcomings. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 2011. “Summative Assessment: Dealing with the ‘Measurement Fallacy’.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 251–273. doi:10.1080/03075070903545082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar