Quality assurance of assessment and moderation discourses involving sessional staff

References

• Adie, L. E., M. Lloyd, and D. Beutel. 2013. “Moderation Practices in a Faculty of Education: The Four Discourse Model.” Proceedings of the Australian Teacher Education Association Conference, 1–6. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. 2009. “Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., P. Boyd, and S. Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K. 2001. “‘I Know a 2:1 When I See It’: Understanding Criteria for Degree Classifications in Franchised University Programmes.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 25 (3): 301–313.10.1080/03098770126527
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., and V. Klenowski. 2002. “Creating Communities of Shared Practice: The Challenges of Assessment Use in Learning and Teaching.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: An international journal 27 (3): 243–256.10.1080/02602930220138606
   Google Scholar
• Ewens, B., L. Andrew, and R. Scott. 2014. Teaching and Learning Forum. Everything in moderation: The Implementation of a Quality Initiative. Perth: Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., and C. Hughes. 2010. “An Investigation of the Confidence Levels of Course/Subject Coordinators in Undertaking Aspects of Their Assessment Responsibilities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., K. Purnell, and R. Zipf. 2008. “Assessing the Quality of Student Work: The Role of “Substantive Conversation” Between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142.10.1080/02602930601125681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., B. den Outer, and M. Price. 2013. “Learning to Mark: Exemplars, Dialogue and Participation in Assessment Communities.” Higher Education Research and Development 32 (6): 888–900.10.1080/07294360.2013.806438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M. 2013. “Setting the Standards for Sessional Staff: Quality Learning and Teaching.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 10 (3): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzich, S., R. C. Groves, S. O’Hare, and L. Pelliccione. 2010. “Building Team Capacity: Sustaining Quality in Assessment and Moderation Practices in a Fully Online Unit.” In Australian Technology Network (ATN) Conference 2010. Assessment – Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation, Nov 18, 2010, Sydney: University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., K. Weir, and A. Woods. 2008. Development of a Set of Principles to Guide a P-12 Syllabus Framework. Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/syllabus/syll_principles_dev_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Percy, A., M. Scoufis, S. Parry, A. Goody, M. Hicks, I. Macdonald, K. Martinez et al. 2008. The RED Report: Recognition – Enhancement – Development: The Contribution of Sessional Teachers to Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2005. “Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2013. Assuring Academic Achievement Standards: From Moderation to Calibration. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and K. Coombe. 2006. “Quality and Qualms in the Marking of University Assignments by Sessional Staff: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education 51 (1): 45–69.10.1007/s10734-004-6376-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (TEQSA) Tertiary Education Quality Standards Authority. 2012. Application Guide: Application for Accreditation of a Higher Education Course of Study (AQF Qualification). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar