The influence of student gender on the assessment of undergraduate student work

References

• Allport, G. W. 1957. “European and American Theories of Personality.” In Perspectives in Personality Theories, edited by H. P. David and H. von Bracken, 3–26. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, J., and B. McCarthy. 1988. “Personal Biases in Student Assessment.” Educational Research 30: 142–145.10.1080/0013188880300208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auwarter, A. E., and M. A. Aruguete. 2008. “Effects of Student Gender and Socioeconomic Status on Teacher Perceptions.” Journal of Educational Research 4: 243–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. 1994. “The Four Horsemen of Automaticity: Awareness, Efficiency, Intention, and Control in Social Cognition.” In Handbook of Social Cognition. 2nd ed, edited by R. S. Wyer Jr. and T. K. Srull, 1–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Batten, J., J. Batey, L. Shafe, L. Gubby, and P. D. J. Birch. 2013. “The Influence of Reputation Information on the Assessment of Undergraduate Student Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 4: 417–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baty, P. 2007, May 25. Trust Eroded by Blind Marking. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/209075.article.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Blair, I. V. 2002. “The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6: 242–261.10.1207/pspr.2002.6.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V. 2005. “The Role of Stereotypes in Decision-making Processes.” Medical Decision Making 25: 112–118.10.1177/0272989X04273800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bols, A. 2013. “Student Views on Assessment.” In Improving Student Engagement and Development through Assessment: Theory and Practice in Higher Education, edited by L. Clouder, C. Broughan, S. Jewell, and G. Steventon, 4–18. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. 1984. “Sex Bias in the Evaluation of Students.” British Journal of Social Psychology 23: 147–153.10.1111/bjso.1984.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, C. 1976. “Teacher Expectation: Sociopsychological Dynamics.” Review of Educational Research 46: 185–213.10.3102/00346543046002185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. J. 2008. “University Student Anonymity in the Summative Assessment of Written Work.” Higher Education Research and Development 27: 43–54.10.1080/07294360701658724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. 1988. “Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-involving and Ego-involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 58: 1–14.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. 2000. “Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5: 95–105.10.1080/135625100114984
   Google Scholar
• Craven, R. G., H. W. Marsh, and R. L. Debus. 1991. “Effects of Internally Focused Feedback and Attributional Feedback on Enhancement of Academic Self-concept.” Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 17–27.10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. 1988. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students.” Review of Educational Research 58: 438–481.10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, R. 2010. “Students as Customers?” Higher Education Review 3: 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, D. H., L. Coombs, L. DeAlleaume, D. West, and B. Parnes. 2012. “An Assessment of the Hawthorne Effect in Practice-based Research.” The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 25: 83–86.10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., J. Robson, and B. Read. 2001. “An Analysis of Undergraduate Writing Styles in the Context of Gender and Achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 26: 313–326.10.1080/03075070120076282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., J. Robson, and B. Read. 2002. “Gendered Patterns in Writing and Degree Award.” In Gender, Teaching and Research in Higher Education: Challenges for the Twenty-first Century, edited by G. Howie and A. Tauchert, 167–180. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., B. Read, L. Melling, and J. Robson. 2003. “University Lecturers' Perceptions of Gender and Undergraduate Writing.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24: 357–373.10.1080/01425690301891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and R. D. Crick. 2003. “Testing and Motivation for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 10: 169–207.10.1080/0969594032000121270
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., J. Biggs, and N. Purdie. 1996. “Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66: 99–136.10.3102/00346543066002099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and Jaeger, R. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning: A Deductive Approach.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 111–122.10.1080/0969595980050107
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, K., and G. Papageorgiou. 2009. “Good, Bad and Insufficient: Student’s Expectations, Perceptions and Uses of Feedback.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 1: 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. 2003. “Student Feedback, Learning and Development.” In Higher Education and the Lifecourse, edited by M. Slowey and D. Watson, 67–78. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, P. 2000. Learning from Feedback on Assessment. In The Practice of University History Teaching, edited by A. Booth and P. Hyland, 233–247. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, T. 2007. Student Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback. Unpublished Report to the University Learning and Teaching Committee, Winchester: The University of Winchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1996. “On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions.” Psychological Review 103: 582–591.10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laryea, S. 2013. “Feedback Provision and Use in Teaching and Learning: A Case Study.” Education and Training 7: 665–680.
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking University Teaching. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.10.4324/9780203304846
   Google Scholar
• Malouff, J. M., A. J. Emmerton, and N. S. Schutte. 2013. “The Risk of a Halo Bias as a Reason to Keep Students Anonymous During Grading.” Teaching of Psychology 40: 233–237.10.1177/0098628313487425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, W. D. 1972. “The Sex Factor in Grading Composition.” Research in Teaching of English 6: 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, M., and L. Billington. 2005. “A Review of the Literature on Marking Reliability.” Paper Commissioned by the National Assessment Agency. Accessed May 19, 2015. https://cerp.aqa.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf_upload/CERP_RP_MM_01052005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, S. E., and I. Dennis. 1990. “Blind Marking and Sex Bias in Student Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2: 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31: 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., and T. D. Wilson. 1977. “The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 250–256.10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NUS. 2008. “Higher Education Campaign: Mark my Words, Not My Name” [ online]. Accessed February 23, 2012. http://www.nus.org.uk/en/Campaigns/Higher-Education/Mark-my-words-not-my-name/
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C., J. Stefaniak, and G. Corrigan. 2009. “Marking Identifiable Scripts: Following Up Student Concerns.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1: 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B., B. Francis, and J. Robson. 2005. “Gender, ‘Bias’, Assessment and Feedback: Analysing the Written Assessment of Undergraduate History Essays.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 3: 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Roen, D. 1992. “Gender and Teacher Response to Student Writing.” In Gender Issues in the Teaching of English, edited by N. McCracken and B. Appleby, 126–141. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spear, M. 1984. “Sex Bias in Science Teachers’ Ratings of Work and Pupil Characteristics.” European Journal of Science Education 6: 369–377.10.1080/0140528840060407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124–1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ryn, M., and S. S. Fu. 2003. “Paved With Good Intentions: Do Public Health and Human Service Providers Contribute to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health?” American Journal of Public Health 93: 248–255.10.2105/AJPH.93.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., and J. A. Bargh. 1998. “Control and Automaticity in Social Life.” In Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 446–496. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. J., K. Jones, and M. D. Sherman. 1998. “Reputation Information and Teacher Feedback: Their Influences on Children’s Perceptions of Behaviour Problem Peers.” Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology 17: 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelegg, D. 2002. “Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment.” Planet 3: 7–8.10.11120/plan.2002.00050007
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., P. Bridges, and H. Woolf. 2000. “Mark Distributions and Marking Practices in UK Higher Education: Some Challenging Issues.” Active Learning in Higher Education 1: 7–27.10.1177/1469787400001001002
   Google Scholar