Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes

References

• Alderson, J. C. 1986. “Innovations in Language Testing?” In Innovations in Language Testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER Conference, edited by M. Portal, 93–105. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., and J. Roksa. 2010. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226028576.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Australian Learning and Teaching Council. 2010. Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Project – Final Report. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bergan, S., R. Damian, eds. 2010. Higher Education for Modern Societies: Competences and Values. Higher Education Series No. 15. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., and C. Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blömeke, S., O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, and J. Fege, eds. 2013. Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education: Tasks and Challenges. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1974. “Time and Learning.” American Psychologist 29 (9): 682–688. doi:10.1037/h0037632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok, D. 2006. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. 1991. “Grading Practices and Validity.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 10 (1): 35–36. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00182.x.
   Google Scholar
• Budé, L., T. Imbos, M. W. van de Wiel, M. P. Berger. 2011. “The Effect of Distributed Practice on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Statistics.” Higher Education 62 (1): 69–79. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9366-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., ed. 2014. Higher Education Learning Outcomes Assessment: International Perspectives. Vol. 6 Series: Higher Education Research and Policy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., G. Cohen, and N. Stanhope. 1992. “Very Long-Term Memory for Knowledge Acquired at School and University.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 6 (6): 467–482. doi:10.1002/acp.2350060603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, D. D., and M. Beerkens. 2013. “Designing the Framework Conditions for Assuring Academic Standards: Lessons Learned about Professional, Market, and Government Regulation of Academic Quality.” Higher Education 65 (3): 341–357. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9548-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, J. A., G. Thomson, and C.-M. Zhao. 2012. “The Learning Outcomes Race: The Value of Self-Reported Gains in Large Research Universities.” Higher Education 64 (3): 317–335. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9496-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. 1941. “On Pleasure, Emotion, and Striving.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1 (4): 391–430. doi:org/10.2307/2103143.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. 1885. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. Translated H. A. Ruger and C. E. Bussenius. 1913. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. M., and K. Trimble. 1992. “Anxiety, Coping and Academic Performance.” Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal 5 (4): 337–350. doi:10.1080/10615809208248370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, L. 2004. “A Challenge to Established Assessment Practice.” Higher Education Quarterly 58 (1): 43–62. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00259.x.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. 1977. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” College Composition and Communication 28 (2): 122–128. doi:10.2307/356095.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. 1995. “Frameworks for Understanding as Experienced in Essay Writing and in Preparing for Examination.” Educational Psychologist 30 (1): 47–54. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3001_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiamengo, J. 2013. “The Fail-Proof Student.” Academic Questions 26 (3): 329–337. doi:10.1007/s12129-013-9372-5.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D. 2014. “Action, Agency and Responsibility.” Neuropsychologia 55 (1): 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., and H. Nesi. 2013. “A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing.” Applied Linguistics 34 (1): 25–52. doi:10.1093/applin/ams024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert O’Brien, J., B. J. Millis, and M. W. Cohen. 2008. The Course Syllabus: A Learning-Centered Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, R. 2012. “Does Continuous Assessment in Higher Education Support Student Learning?” Higher Education 64 (4): 489–502. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9506-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. 1987. “Essay Writing and the Quality of Feedback.” In Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology, edited by J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck and D. Warren-Piper, 109–119. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, S. 2008. “Assess As You Go: The Effect of Continuous Assessment on Student Learning During a Short Course in Archaeology.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/02602930601122498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E. 2003. Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2009. “Redisciplining Generic Attributes: The Disciplinary Context in Focus.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (1): 85–100. doi:10.1080/03075070802602018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2013. “There is Nothing Generic about Graduate Attributes: Unpacking the Scope of Context.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 37 (5): 591–605. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.645466.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. 2010. “External Examiner System in the United Kingdom.” In Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of Innovative Policy Instruments, edited by D. D. Dill and M. Beerkens, 21–36. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., and R. McDaniel. 2012. “Transforming Online Learning through Narrative and Student Agency.” Educational Technology & Society 15 (4): 344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2009. “Has Goal Setting Gone Wild, or Have Its Attackers Abandoned Good Scholarship?” Academy of Management Perspectives 23 (1): 17–23. doi:10.5465/AMP.2009.37008000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham, eds. 2013. New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., G. P. Latham, K. J. Smith, and R. E. Wood. 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., K. N. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. 1981. “Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980.” Psychological Bulletin 90 (1): 125–152. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. N., M. Jahoda, and R. L. James. 1967. “Assumptions Underlying the Use of University Examinations.” Higher Education Quarterly 21 (3): 341–351. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.1967.tb00245.x.
   Google Scholar
• Osman, M. 2014. Future-Minded: The Psychology of Agency and Control. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. 2008. “The Phenomenology of Action: A Conceptual Framework.” Cognition 107 (1): 179–217. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. 2003. “In Other (People’s) Words: Plagiarism by University Students – Literature and Lessons.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (5): 461–488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677.
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N. 1997. “Counterfactual Thinking.” Psychological Bulletin 121 (1): 133–148. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., and H. Pashler. 2010. “Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies.” Educational Researcher 39 (5): 406–412. doi:10.3102/0013189X10374770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Grade Integrity and the Representation of Academic Achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 807–826. doi:10.1080/03075070802706553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010a. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010b. “Fidelity as a Precondition for Integrity in Grading Academic Achievement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (6): 727–743. doi:10.1080/02602930902977756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2011. “Academic Freedom, Achievement Standards and Professional Identity.” Quality in Higher Education 17 (11): 103–118. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.554639.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2013a. “Assuring Academic Achievement Standards: From Moderation to Calibration.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 20 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2013b. “Making Competent Judgments of Competence.” In Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education, edited by S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn and J. Fege, 13–27. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2013c. “Opening up Feedback: Teaching Learners to See.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 54–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2014a. “Learning from Assessment Events: The Role of Goal Knowledge.” In Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback, edited by C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle and J. McArthur, 152–172. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694549.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2014b. “The Futility of Attempting to Codify Academic Achievement Standards.” Higher Education 67 (3): 273–288. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2001. “Practice Mind-ed Orders.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina and E. von Savigny, 50–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, F. 2001. “From Here to Equality Grading Policies for Egalitarians.” Educational Theory 51 (1): 63–73. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2001.00063.x.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., P. Railton, R. F. Baumeister, and C. Sripada. 2013. “Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (2): 119–141. doi:10.1177/1745691612474317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. 2010. Measuring College Learning Responsibly: Accountability in a New Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. 2013. “An Approach to Testing and Modeling Competence.” In Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education, edited by S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn and J. Fege, 29–43. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. 1980. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (4): 378–388. doi:10.2307/356588.
   Google Scholar
• Sternglass, M. 1997. Time to Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1997. “‘Improving Ratings’: Audit in the British University System.” European Review 5 (3): 305–321. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1234981X(199707)5:33.0.CO;24.10.1017/S1062798700002660
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. N. 1974. “Nature of Problem Ill-Structuredness: Implications for Problem Formulation and Solution.” Decision Sciences 5 (4): 632–643. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00642.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tippin, G. K., K. D. Lafreniere, and S. Page. 2012. “Student Perception of Academic Grading: Personality, Academic Orientation, and Effort.” Active Learning in Higher Education 13 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1177/1469787411429187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K. 2013. “OECD Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Rationale, Challenges and Initial Insights from the Feasibility Study.” In Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education, edited by S. Blömeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn and J. Fege, 113–126. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6091-867-4
   Google Scholar
• Trotter, E. 2006. “Student Perceptions of Continuous Summative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (5): 505–521. doi:10.1080/02602930600679506.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2010. “Measuring Plagiarism: Researching What Students Do, Not What They Say They Do.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 41–59. doi:10.1080/03075070902912994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watty, K., M. Freeman, B. Howieson, P. Hancock, B. O’Connell, P. de Lange, A. Abraham. 2014. “Social Moderation, Assessment and Assuring Standards for Accounting Graduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (4): 461–478. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.848336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissberg, R. 2013. “Critically Thinking about Critical Thinking.” Academic Questions 26 (3): 317–328. doi:10.1007/s12129-013-9375-2.
   Google Scholar
• Whateley, M. K. G., and B. C. Scott. 2006. “Evaluation Techniques.” Chap.10 in Introduction to Mineral Exploration. 2nd ed. edited by J. Charles Moon, K. G. Michael Whateley, and M. Anthony Evans, 199–252. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. B. 2006. “The Place of the Closed Book, Invigilated Final Examination in a Knowledge Economy.” Educational Media International 43 (2): 107–119. doi:10.1080/09523980500237864.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2010. “Subject Benchmarking in the UK.” In Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of Innovative Policy Instruments, edited by D. D. Dill, and M. Beerkens, 157–181. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_9.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. B., and A. Wong. 2009. “The Efficacy of Final Examinations: A Comparative Study of Closed-Book, Invigilated Exams and Open-Book, Open-Web Exams.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 227–236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00929.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, T. E., J. F. Magnotti, K. Marchuk, B. S. Schultz, A. Luther, and V. Varfolomeeva. 2011. “Does Effort Still Count? More on What Makes the Grade.” Teaching of Psychology 38 (1): 10–15. doi:10.1177/0098628310390907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn, J. 2013. “English Compositionism as Fraud and Failure.” Academic Questions 26 (3): 270–284. doi:10.1007/s12129-013-9368-1.
   Google Scholar