Peer conferences in calculus: the impact of systematic training

References

• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E. C. 1999. “The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 215–241. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, and C. Lee. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., and J. G. Greeno. 2000. “Identity, Agency, and Knowing in Mathematics Worlds.” In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by J. Boaler, 171–200. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. 1988. “Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-involving and Ego-involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 58 (1): 1–14.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., N. De Leeuw, M. H. Chiu, and C. LaVancher. 1994. “Eliciting Self-explanations Improves Understanding.” Cognitive Science 18 (3): 439–477. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., S. A. Siler, H. Jeong, T. Yamauchi, and R. G. Hausmann. 2001. “Learning from Human Tutoring.” Cognitive Science 25 (4): 471–533.10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., A. Boufi, K. McClain, and J. Whitenack. 1997. “Reflective Discourse and Collective Reflection.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28 (3): 258–277.10.2307/749781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dounas-Frazer, D. R., and D. L. Reinholz. Forthcoming. Attending to Lifelong Learning Skills Through Guided Reflection in a Physics Class. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01788.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., D. E. McCormick, and R. Donato. 1997. “Learning What Counts as a Mathematical Explanation.” Linguistics and Education 9 (4): 313–339.10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90004-8
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., and L. Sowder. 2007. “Toward Comprehensive Perspectives on the Learning and Teaching of Proof.” Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning 2: 805–842.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J., S. Epstein, S. Leon, D. L. T. Matrundola, S. Reber, and K. Choi. 2014. “Implementation and Effects of LDC and MDC in Kentucky Districts.” CRESST Policy Brief No. 13. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1996. “Teaching as Learning, in Practice.” Mind, Culture, & Activity 3 (3): 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. 2006. “The Structure and Function of Explanations.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (10): 464–470. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. M., and C. S. Dweck. 1998. “Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1): 33–52.10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. 1983. “On the Definition of Feedback.” Behavioral Science 28 (1): 4–13. doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L. 2015a. “Peer-assisted Reflection: A Design-based Intervention for Improving Success in Calculus.” International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s40753-015-0005-y.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L. 2015b. “The Assessment Cycle: A Model for Learning Through Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1–15. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982.
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L. Forthcoming. Capturing Changes in Calculus Explanations Supported by Peer Review.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 1985. Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., A. Cooper, and L. Lancaster. 2002. “Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 (1): 71–81.10.1080/13558000110102904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27.10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. 2015. “The Quality of Written Peer Feedback on Undergraduates’ Draft Answers to an Assignment, and the Use Made of the Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (2): 232–247. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.898737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar