Professional field in the accreditation process: examining information technology programmes at Dutch Universities of Applied Sciences

References

• den Adel, M., W. Blauw, and H. Entzinger. 2003. Report of the ICT Sector in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Alajoutsijärvi, K., K. Juusola, and M. Siltaoja. 2013. “Academic Capitalism Hits the Fan: The Birth of Acamanic Capitalism.” Getting Things Done: Dialogues in Critical Management Studies 2: 91–121.10.1108/dcms
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G. E., R. A. Boser, and D. L. Householder. 1992. “Coping at the Crossroads: Societal and Educational Transformation.” Journal of Technology Education 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Berente, N. 2009. Conflicting Institutional Logics and the Loose Coupling of Practice with NASA’s Enterprise Information System. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmur, D. 2007. “The Public Regulation of Higher Education Qualities: Rationale, Processes and Outcomes.” In Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation, edited by D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, and M. J. Rosa, 15–45. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., and W. W. Powell. 2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World.” The Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 483–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Caluwé, L. 2012. “Losjes Gekoppelde Systemen: Het Gedachtengoed van Karl Weick [Loosely Coupled Systems: The Ideas of Karl Weick].” In Canon Van Het Leren: 50 Concepten En Hun Grondleggers, edited by M. Ruijters and R. J. Simons, 373–384. Deventer: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., M. J. Rosa, and B. Stensaker. 2015. “Why is Quality in Higher Education Not Achieved? The View of Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (ahead-of-print): 1–16. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775?journalCode=caeh20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 2013. ICT, Kennis En Economie 2013. Den Haag: Central Bureau voor de Statistiek, [Statistics Netherlands].
   Google Scholar
• Cucchiarini, C, W. Daelemans, and H. Strik. 2001. “Strengthening the Dutch Human Language Technology Infrastructure.” ELRA Newsletter 6 (4): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J., J. Joyce, T. Hassall, and M. Broadbent. 2003. “Quality in Higher Education: From Monitoring to Management.” Quality Assurance in Education 11 (1): 5–14.10.1108/09684880310462038
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T. 2015. Entrepreneurial Universities – Exploring the Conditions and Factors Influencing the Development of Entrepreneurship in Universities. Amsterdam: VU University.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, T., T. Baaken, V. Galan Muros, and A. Meerman. 2011. The State of European University-Business Cooperation: Final Report – Study on the Cooperation between Higher Education Institutions and Public and Private Organisations in Europe. Münster: Science-to-Business Marketing Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Deuten, J. 2013. ERAWATCH Country Reports 2011: The Netherlands. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University – Industry – Government Relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–123.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Skills Panorama. 2014. Employability and Skills of Higher Education Graduates: Analytical Highlight. Brighton: A Report by ICF GHK and Cedefop for the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 2005. The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: ENQA.
   Google Scholar
• Frederik, H. 2013. “Waar Blijft de Afstemming, Over de Relatie IT-onderwijs en Beroepenveld [Where is the Coordination in the Relationship between IT Education and the Professional Field].” Informatie 55 (2): 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Fusarelli, L. D. 2002. “Tightly Coupled Policy in Loosely Coupled Systems: Institutional Capacity and Organizational Change.” Journal of Educational Administration 40 (6): 561–575.10.1108/09578230210446045
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., K. Stewart, E. Treasure, and B. Chadwick. 2008. “Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews and Focus Groups.” BDJ 204 (6): 291–295.10.1038/bdj.2008.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillebaard, H., C.-J. Jager, R. te Velde, J. Steur, and A. Vankan. 2014. Dé ICT’er Bestaat Niet: Analyse Van Vraag en Aanbod op de Nederlandse ICT-Arbeidsmarkt [The ICT’er Does Not Exist: Analysis of Supply and Demand in the Dutch ICT Labour Market]. Utrecht: Dialogic Innovatie & Interactie.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanefendic, S., M. Heitor, and H. Horta. 2015. “Training Students for New Jobs: The Role of Technical and Vocational Higher Education and Implications for Science Policy in Portugal.” Technology Forecasting and Social Change (Submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., and A. Moynihan. 2010. “Transforming Academic Practice: Human Resources Challenges.” In The Research Mission of Higher Education Institutions outside the University Sector, edited by S. Kyvik and B. Lepori, 77–93. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9244-2
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. 2008. “Shifting Boundaries in Higher Education: Dutch Hogescholen on the Move.” In Non-University Higher Education in Europe, edited by James Taylor, Maria de Lourdes Machado, José Brites Ferreira, and Rui Santiago, 147–167. Dordrecht, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., and F. Kaiser. 2001. Fixed and Fuzzy Boundaries in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of (Binary) Structures in Nine Countries. AWT-aS Nr. 19. Enschede: Twente, CHEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B. 2010. “The Regional Relevance of Research in Universities of Applied Sciences.” In The Research Mission of Higher Education Institutions outside the University Sector, edited by S. Kyvik and B. Lepori, 25–44. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9244-2
   Google Scholar
• Kauppinnen, I. 2012. “Towards Transnational Academic Capitalism.” Higher Education 64 (4): 543–556.10.1007/s10734-012-9511-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolster, R., and D. F. Westerheijden. 2014. Employability of Professional Bachelors from an International Perspective (Final Report). Enschede: Twente, CHEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., D. F. Westerheijden, E. Epping, M. Faber, and E. de Weert. 2013. “Stakeholders’ Involvement in Quality Assurance in Higher Education.” Paper presented at EU Life Long Learning Programme Project IBAR Closing Conference, Prague, November 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Vol. 75. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., and M. Van der Wende. 2007. “To Rank or to Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (3–4): 306–329.10.1177/1028315307303544
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, P., and J. B. Berger. 2008. “Academic Capitalism and Academic Culture: A Case Study.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 16 (23): 1–27.10.14507/epaa.v16n23.2008
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatie Organisatie. 2008. The Higher Education Qualifications Framework in the Netherlands. A Presentation for Compatibility with the Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. The Hague: NVAO.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatie Organisatie. 2011. Assessment Frameworks for the Higher Education Accreditation System. The Hague: NVAO.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatie Organisatie. 2014. Assessment Frameworks for the Higher Education Accreditation System. The Hague: NVAO.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickolai, D. H., S. G. Hoffman, and M. N. Trautner. 2012. “Can a Knowledge Sanctuary Also Be an Economic Engine? The Marketization of Higher Education as Institutional Boundary Work.” Sociology Compass 6 (3): 205–218.10.1111/soco.2012.6.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Reviews of Innovation Policy. Netherlands 2014. Paris: OECD
   Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D., and K. E. Weick. 1990. “Loosely Coupled System: A Reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plewa, C., V. Galán-Muros, and T. Davey. 2015. “Engaging Business in Curriculum Design and Delivery: A Higher Education Institution Perspective.” Higher Education 70: 35–53.10.1007/s10734-014-9822-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., B. Stensaker, and L. Harvey. 2004. “Accreditation, Standards and Diversity: An Analysis of EQUIS Accreditation Reports.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 735–750.10.1080/0260293042000227263
   Google Scholar
• Sandelin, S. K., M. Lahdeniemi, and S. Laine. 2012. “Open Innovations between a University of Applied Sciences and SMEs: A Finnish Model for Regional Innovation.” In Strategies and Promotion of Innovation in Regional Policies around the Mare Balticum, edited by M. Hogeforster, 100–121. Hamburg: Baltic Sea Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., K. Tremblay, E. Basri, and E. Arnal. 2008. Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. Vol. 1. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Scheele, K., R. Limbach, and J. de Bruin. 2006. Accreditation in International Perspective. Utrecht: The Inspectorate of Education in the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, S., and D. F. Westerheijden. 2004. Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area. Vol. 5. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-2797-0
   Google Scholar
• Serap, E., and C. Cress. 2014. “Faculty Perspectives on Programme Curricular Assessment: Individual and Institutional Characteristics That Influence Participation Engagement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (5): 531–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, C., and S. Sia. 2004. “An Institutional Perspective on Sources of ERP Package – Organisation Misalignments.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (4): 375–397.10.1016/j.jsis.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., L. Langfeldt, L. Harvey, J. Huisman, and D. F. Westerheijden. 2011. “An in-Depth Study on the Impact of External Quality Assurance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (4): 465–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichler, U. 2007. “Does Higher Education Matter? Lessons from a Comparative Graduate Survey.” European Journal of Education 42 (1): 11–34.10.1111/ejed.2007.42.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J. 2004. “Three Rounds of Evaluation and the Idea of Accreditation in Finnish Higher Education.” In Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area, edited by S. Schwarz and D. F. Westerheijden, 101–4125. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19.10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1980. “Loosely Coupled Systems: Relaxed Meanings and Thick Interpretations.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O. H. 2003. “Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research.” Higher Education 45 (3): 307–335.10.1023/A:1022667923715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar