Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward

References

• Alavi, M. 1994. “Computer-mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation.” MIS Quarterly 18 (2): 159–174. doi:10.2307/249763.10.2307/249763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althauser, R., and K. Darnall. 2001. “Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing through Peer Reviews: An Exploration of Assisted Performance.” Teaching Sociology 29 (1): 23–35. doi:10.2307/1318780.10.2307/1318780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, L., C. K. Shue, B. Kritt, S. Ginsburg, and D. T. Stern. 2005. “Medical Students’ Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 20 (9): 819–824. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0162.x.10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0162.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashenafi, M. M., G. Riccardi, and M. Ronchetti. in press. “Predicting Students’ Final Exam Scores from their Course Activities.” In Frontiers in Education. El Paso, TX: IEEE. 20–25 Oct 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., and W. D. Hamilton. 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 211 (4489): 1390–1396. doi:10.1126/science.7466396.10.1126/science.7466396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 427–441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., E. Wells-Parker, and I. Chevillard. 1997. “Assessing the Methodological Quality of Research in Narrative Reviews and Meta-analyses.” In The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research, 405–429. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, xxxii, 458 pp. doi:10.1037/10222-012.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzidi, L., and A. Jaillet. 2009. “Can Online Peer Assessment be Trusted?” Educational Technology and Society 12 (4): 257–268. http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_4/22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burguillo, J. C. 2010. “Using Game Theory and Competition-based Learning to Stimulate Student Motivation and Performance.” Computers & Education 55 (2): 566–575. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. S., D. L. Mothersbaugh, C. Brammer, and T. Taylor. 2001. “Peer versus Self-assessment of Oral Business Presentation Performance.” Business Communication Quarterly 64 (3): 23–40. doi:10.1177/108056990106400303.10.1177/108056990106400303
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and C. Tsai. 2009. “An Educational Research Course Facilitated by Online Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (1): 105–117. doi:10.1080/14703290802646297.10.1080/14703290802646297
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 2005. “Peer Assessment of Language Proficiency.” Language Testing 22 (1): 93–121. doi:10.1191/0265532205lt298oa.10.1191/0265532205lt298oa
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2010. “Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 328–338. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and R. W. Wilson. 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 891–901. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891.10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. B., and R. H. Bradley. 1978. “Simulation Games, Learning, and Retention.” The Elementary School Journal 78 (4): 247–253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1001260.10.1086/esj.1978.78.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 2006. “Peer Assessment: Judging the Quality of Students’ Work by Comments Rather than Marks.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 69–82. doi:10.1080/14703290500467566.10.1080/14703290500467566
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, D. L., and Slavin, R. E. (1976). Teams-games-tournament: A Final Report on the Research ( Report No. 217). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University, Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2003. “Involving Students in Assessment.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 3 (2): 102–108. doi:10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322. doi:10.3102/00346543070003287.10.3102/00346543070003287
   Google Scholar
• Fraas, J. W. 1980. “The Use of Seven Simulation Games in a College Economics Course.” The Journal of Experimental Education 48 (4): 264–280.10.1080/00220973.1980.11011744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehringer, E. F. 2001. “Electronic Peer Review and Peer Grading in Computer-science Courses.” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 33 (1): 139–143.10.1145/366413
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., F. Dochy, P. Onghena, K. Struyven, and S. Smeets. 2011. “Goals of Peer Assessment and their Associated Quality Concepts.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 719–735. doi:10.1080/03075071003759037.10.1080/03075071003759037
   Google Scholar
• Giovannella, C., and F. Scaccia. 2014, July. “Technology-enhanced ‘Trusted’ Participatory Grading.” In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 347–349. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., M. Valcke, and I. Roozen. 2012. “How Effective are Self- and Peer Assessment of Oral Presentation Skills Compared with Teachers’ Assessments?” Active Learning in Higher Education 13 (2): 129–142. doi:10.1177/1469787412441284.10.1177/1469787412441284
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, J., K. T. Ma, and H. H. Kwong. 2005, January. “A Method of Automatic Grade Calibration in Peer Assessment.” In Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, Newcastle,  Vol. 42, 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S. J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776.10.1080/07294360123776
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and M. James. 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 4 (3): 365–379. doi:10.1080/0969594970040304.10.1080/0969594970040304
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G. 2005. “Using Peer Review with Chinese ESL Student Writers.” Language Teaching Research 9 (3): 321–342. doi:10.1191/1362168805lr169oa.10.1191/1362168805lr169oa
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., P. H. Wu, and C. C. Chen. 2012. “An Online Game Approach for Improving Students’ Learning Performance in Web-based Problem-solving Activities.” Computers & Education 59 (4): 1246–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., and L. Alcock. 2014. “Peer Assessment Without Assessment Criteria.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1774–1787.10.1080/03075079.2013.821974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, V., and J. H. Jo. 2004, December. “Ubiquitous Learning Environment: An Adaptive Teaching System using Ubiquitous Technology.” In Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, Perth, Vol. 468, 474.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. D., and E. Freitag. 1991. “Effects of using an Instructional Game on Motivation and Performance.” The Journal of Educational Research 84 (5): 303–308.10.1080/00220671.1991.10886031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., and F. Fischer. 2010. “Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 344–348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, L. 2008. “Students’ Perception of Peer Evaluation and Teachers’ Role in Seminar Discussions.” Electronic journal of foreign language teaching 5 (1): 84–97.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, A. M., D. M. Shuker, W. R. Cullen, D. Penney, R. F. Preziosi, and C. P. Wheater. 2008. “Relationships between Student Characteristics and Self‐, Peer and Tutor Evaluations of Oral Presentations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 179–190. doi:10.1080/02602930701292498.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, A. M., C. P. Wheater, E. M. Shaw, B. J. Haines, W. R. Cullen, J. C. Boyle, and R. F. Preziosi. 2005. “Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University Affiliation and Participation in the Development of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (1): 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. 2004. “Teaching Data Structures using Competitive Games.” IEEE Transactions on Education 47 (4): 459–466.10.1109/TE.2004.825053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 525–536. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.10.1111/bjet.2010.41.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., and A. L. Steckelberg. 2006. “Perceptions of Web-mediated Peer Assessment.” Academic Exchange Quarterly 10 (2): 265.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., A. L. Steckelberg, and S. Srinivasan. 2008. “Utilizing Peer Interactions to Promote Learning through a Web-based Peer Assessment System.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie 34 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S. J., E. Z. F. Liu, and S. M. Yuan. 2001. “Web-based Peer Assessment: Feedback for Students with Various Thinking-styles.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 (4): 420–432. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-ylänne, S., H. Pihlajamäki, and T. Kotkas. 2006. “Self-, Peer- and Teacher-assessment of Student Essays.” Active Learning in Higher Education 7 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1177/1469787406061148.10.1177/1469787406061148
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxton-Reilly, A. 2009. “A Systematic Review of Tools that Support Peer Assessment.” Computer Science Education 19 (4): 209–232. doi:10.1080/08993400903384844.10.1080/08993400903384844
   Google Scholar
• Matsuno, S. 2009. “Self-, Peer-, and Teacher-assessments in Japanese University EFL Writing Classrooms.” Language Testing 26 (1): 075–100. doi:10.1177/0265532208097337.10.1177/0265532208097337
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., and A. M. Clifford. 2013. “‘Just Enough to Make You Take It Seriously’: Exploring Students’ Attitudes towards Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 65 (6): 677–693.10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, P., and N. Simpson. 2004. “Peer Assessment in First Year University: How the Students Feel.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 30 (2): 135–149.10.1016/j.stueduc.2004.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Michailidis, N., and T. Tsiatsos. 2014, July. “Supporting Students by using Interaction Analysis Tools in Educational Group Blogging: A Case Study of the GIANT Tool.” In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 291–293. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. J. 2003. “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (4): 383–394. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., and M. O’Reilly. 1999. Assessing Open and Distance Learners. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Merino, P. J., M. F. Molina, M. Muñoz-Organero, and C. D. Kloos. 2012. “An Adaptive and Innovative Question-driven Competition-based Intelligent Tutoring System for Learning.” Expert Systems with Applications 39 (8): 6932–6948.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustika, M., M. L. Sari, C. T. Kao, and J. S. Heh. 2014, July. “Digital BINGO Game as a Dynamic Assessment in a Reading Instruction for Learning Indonesian as a Foreign Language: A System Architecture.” In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 219–221. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. 2014. “Formative & Summative Assessments.” Research Starters Education ( Online Edition). Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/essays/27577770/formative-summative-assessments
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and A. Callaghan. 2004. “Implementation of a Formative Assessment Model Incorporating Peer and Self‐assessment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (3): 273–290. doi:10.1080/14703290410001733294.10.1080/14703290410001733294
   Google Scholar
• Otoshi, J., and N. Heffernan. 2007. “An Analysis of Peer Assessment in EFL College Oral Presentation Classrooms.” The Language Teacher-Kyoto-JALT 31 (11): 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ozogul, G., and H. Sullivan. 2009. “Student Performance and Attitudes under Formative Evaluation by Teacher, Self and Peer Evaluators.” Educational Technology Research and Development 57 (3): 393–410. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7.10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7
   Google Scholar
• Papinczak, T., L. Young, and M. Groves. 2007. “Peer Assessment in Problem-based Learning: A Qualitative Study.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 12 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6.10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, L., M. Haake, P. Lindström, B. Sjödén, and A. Gulz. 2012. “A Teachable-agent-based Game Affording Collaboration and Competition: Evaluating Math Comprehension and Motivation.” Educational Technology Research and Development 60 (5): 723–751.10.1007/s11423-012-9246-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patri, M. 2002. “The Influence of Peer Feedback on Self-and Peer-assessment of Oral Skills.” Language Testing 19 (2): 109–131.10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
   Google Scholar
• Pope, N. K. L. 2005. “The Impact of Stress in Self‐ and Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1080/0260293042003243896.
   Google Scholar
• Praver, M., G. Rouault, and J. Eidswick. 2011. “Attitudes and Affect toward Peer Evaluation in EFL Reading Circles.” The Reading Matrix 11 (2): 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Randel, J. M., B. A. Morris, C. D. Wetzel, and B. V. Whitehill. 1992. “The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research.” Simulation & Gaming 23 (3): 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, D., B. Kapralos, and A. Dubrowski. 2014, July. “Gamification for Internet Based Learning in Health Professions Education.” In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 281–282. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rudy, D. W., M. C. Fejfar, C. H. Griffith, and J. F. Wilson. 2001. “Self- and Peer Assessment in a First-year Communication and Interviewing Course.” Evaluation & the Health Professions 24 (4): 436–445. doi:10.1177/016327870102400405.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. J., L. L., Marshall, K. Porter, and H. Jia. 2007. “Peer, Professor and Self-evaluation of Class Participation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 8 (1): 49–61. doi:10.1177/1469787407074049.10.1177/1469787407074049
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, S. 2008. “An Application of Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 7 (2): 5–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, H. 2008. “EFL Classroom Peer Assessment: Training Effects on Rating and Commenting.” Language Testing 25 (4): 553–581. doi:10.1177/0265532208094276.10.1177/0265532208094276
   Google Scholar
• Saito, H., and T. Fujita (2004). “Characteristics and User Acceptance of Peer Rating in EFL Writing Classrooms.” Language Teaching Research 8 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr133oa.10.1191/1362168804lr133oa
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., and C. Haddock. 1994. “Combining Estimates of Effect Size.” In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, edited by H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, 261–281. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart, J., and M. Joy. 2003, July. “Web-based Peer Assessment in Learning Computer Programming.” In 2003 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 180–184. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and T. J. Bastiaens. 2003. “The Training of Peer Assessment Skills to Promote the Development of Reflection Skills in Teacher Education.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 29 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and R. L. Martens. 2004. “Training Teachers in Peer-assessment Skills: Effects on Performance and Perceptions [La formation des enseignants par l’évaluation des compétences entre pairs].” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (1): 59–78.10.1080/1470329032000172720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., G. Moerkerke, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, and F. J. R. C. Dochy. 2001. “Peer Assessment in Problem Based Learning.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 27 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00019-0.10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00019-0
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., and F. Prins. 2006. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Peer Assessment in Teacher Education.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (1): 6–22. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.01.005.10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., A. Cooper, and L. Lancaster. 2002. “Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 (1): 71–81. doi:10.1080/13558000110102904.10.1080/13558000110102904
   Google Scholar
• Spraggins, C. C., and R. E. Rowsey. 1986. “The Effect of Simulation Games and Worksheets on Learning of Varying Ability Groups in a High School Biology Classroom.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23 (3): 219–229.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., S. Narciss, and K. Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., and D. Sluijsmans. 2010. “Unravelling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 265–269. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Sun, G., and J. Shen. 2014, July. “Collaborative Learning through TaaS: A Mobile System for Courses Over the Cloud.” In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, 278–280. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Szafran, R. F., and A. F. Mandolini. 1980. “Test Performance and Concept Recognition: The Effect of a Simulation Game on Two Types of Cognitive Knowledge.” Simulation & Games 11 (3): 326–335.
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, H., M. Leenknecht, and M. Segers. 2011. “Assessing Assessment Quality: Criteria for Quality Assurance in Design of (Peer) Assessment for Learning – A Review of Research Studies.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004.10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.10.3102/00346543068003249
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2010). “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 339–343. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/713611428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., S. S. Lin, and S. M. Yuan. 2002. “Developing Science Activities through a Networked Peer Assessment System.” Computers & Education 38 (1): 241–252. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006a. “Designing Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: Analysis of Written and Oral Peer Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1080/13562510500527685.10.1080/13562510500527685
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006b. “Peer Assessment in University Teaching: Evaluating Seven Course Designs.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (1): 19–36. doi:10.1080/02602930500262346.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennip, N. A. E., M. S. R. Segers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective: The Influence of Interpersonal Variables and Structural Features.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Van Zundert, M., D. Sluijsmans, and J. van Merriënboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., and C. C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51 (1): 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8.10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., C. C. Tsai, and C. Y. Chang. 2006. “Attitudes towards Peer Assessment: A Comparison of the Perspectives of Pre‐service and In‐service Teachers.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (1): 83–92. doi:10.1080/14703290500467640.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y. 1984. “Designing Computer Games to Help Physics Students Understand Newton's Laws of Motion.” Cognition and Instruction 1 (1): 69–108.10.1207/s1532690xci0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., and F. Kurzel. 2008. “Engaging Students in Reflective Practice through a Process of Formative Peer Review and Peer Assessment.” ATN Assessment Conference 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/atna/article/download/376/252
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. H., W. B. Chiou, H. Y. Kao, C. H. A. Hu, and S. H. Huang. 2012. “Re-exploring Game-assisted Learning Research: The Perspective of Learning Theoretical Bases.” Computers & Education 59 (4): 1153–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., and R. Lucking. 2008. “The Impact of Two Types of Peer Assessment on Students’ Performance and Satisfaction within a Wiki Environment.” The Internet and Higher Education 11 (3–4): 186–193. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005.10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
   Google Scholar