Using rubrics in student self-assessment: student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context

References

• Andrade, H. G. 2000. “Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning.” Educational Leadership 57 (5): 13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. G. 2005. “Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” College Teaching 53 (1): 27–31.10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. G., and B. A. Boulay. 2003. “Role of Rubric-referenced Self-Assessment in Learning to Write.” The Journal of Educational Research 97 (1): 21–30. doi:10.1080/00220670309596625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., and Y. Du. 2005. “Student Perspectives on Rubric-referenced Assessment.” Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 10 (3): 159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Y. Du, and K. Mycek. 2010. “Rubric-referenced Self-assessment and Middle School Students’ Writing.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2): 199–214. doi:10.1080/09695941003696172.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., Y. Du, and X. Wang. 2008. “Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric-referenced Self-assessment on Elementary Schools Students’ Writing.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 27 (2): 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., X. Wang, Y. Du, and R. L. Akawi. 2009. “Rubric-referenced Self-assessment and Self-efficacy for Writing.” The Journal of Educational Research 102 (4): 287–302. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.4.287-302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaii, E., S. Taghaddomi, and R. Pashmforoosh. 2016. “Speaking Self-assessment: Mismatches between Learners’ and Teachers’ Criteria.” Language Testing 33 (3): 411–437. doi:10.1177/0265532215590847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. 2016. “Student-generated Scoring Rubrics: Examining their Formative Value for Improving ESL Students’ Writing Performance.” Assessing Writing 29: 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. 2013. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M., and F. Chen. 2015. “The Quality and Effectiveness of Descriptive Rubrics.” Educational Review 67 (3): 343–368. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., D. M. McInerney, and G. A. D. Liem. 2009. “Student Perspectives of Assessment: Considering What Assessment Means to Learners.” In Student Perspectives on Assessment: What Students Can Tell Us about Assessment for Learning, edited by D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, and G. A. D. Liem, 1–21. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2011. From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-heritage Settings. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, M., Hanita, M., Nishioka, V., Smiley, R., & Park, O. 2011. An Investigation of the Impact of the 6 + 1 Trait Writing Model on Grade 5 Student Writing Achievement (NCEE 2012-4010). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2015. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H., S. Zinkgraf, D. Wormuth, V. Hartfiel, and J. Hughey. 1981. Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, G., V. Meier, and J. Trace. 2015. “Building a Better Rubric: Mixed Methods Rubric Revision.” Assessing Writing 26: 51–66. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2 (2): 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S., and Tierney, S. T. 2008. Performance Assessment. In 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, edited by T. L. Good, Vol. 1, 461–470. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., and P. Lindsey. 2015. “Understanding Variations between Student and Teacher Application of Rubrics.” Assessing Writing 26: 67–79. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. 1996. “Validity of Performance Assessments.” In Technical Issues in Large-scale Perforamcne Assessment, edited by G. Phillips, 1–18. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. 2011. “Instructional Help for Self-assessment and Self-regulation: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Self-assessment Scripts vs. Rubrics.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and Alonso-Tapia, J. 2013. Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it Happens, How is it Acquired and What to Do to Develop it in Our Students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 11 (2): 551–576. doi:10.14204/ejrep.30.12200.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review.” Educational Research Review 9: 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., A. Jonsson, and J. Strijbos. 2016. “Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning through Self-assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation.” In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal, 311–326. Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and M. Romero. 2014. “To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-assessment on Self-regulation, Performance and Self-efficacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., J. A. Tapia, and J. A. Huertas. 2012. “Rubrics and Self-assessment Scripts Effects on Self-regulation, Learning and Self-efficacy in Secondary Education.” Learning and Individual Differences 22 (6): 806–813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 1997. “What’s Wrong-and What’s Right-with Rubrics.” Educational Leadership 55: 72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, Y. M., and H. Andrade. 2010. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (4): 435–448. doi:10.1080/02602930902862859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Keefer, L. 2010. “Rubric-Referenced Assessment in Teacher Preparation: An Opportunity to Learn by Using.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15 (8): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ritche, J., and J. Lewis. 2003. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sundeen, T. H. 2014. “Instructional Rubrics: Effects of Presentation Options on Writing Quality.” Assessing Writing 21: 74–88. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C. E., and J. E. Purpura. 2015. “Learning-oriented Assessment in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms.” In Handbook of Second Language Assessment, edited by D. Tsagari and J. Baneerjee, 255–272. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, M., J. Hattie, N. Machts, J. Möller, and U. Harms. 2016. “What Makes Rubrics Effective in Teacher-feedback? Transparency of Learning Goals is Not Enough.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 44–45: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attaining Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Printrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and A. R. Moylan. 2009. “Self-regulation: When Metacognition and Motivation Intersect.” In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, edited by D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, 299–315. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar