Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research

References

• Apter, M. J. 1989. Reversal Theory: Motivation, Emotion and Personality. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. “The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-efficacy Theory.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4 (3): 359–373.10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont, C., M. O’Doherty, and L. Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687.10.1080/03075071003731135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167.10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov, eds. 2007. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy, eds. 2013. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and D. Walker. 1998. “Promoting Reflection in Professional Courses: The Challenge of Context.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 191–206.10.1080/03075079812331380384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, V. 2013. “How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (4): 406–424.10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233.10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2009. “Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 79–89.10.1080/02602930801895786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. “Sustainable Feedback and the Development of Student Self-evaluative Capacities.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 117–126. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2016). “Feedback as Dialogue.” Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory 1–6. Accessed http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-110.1007/978-981-287-532-7
   Google Scholar
• Carson, J. G., and G. L. Nelson. 1996. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 5 (1): 1–19.10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. 2000. “Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 95–105.10.1080/135625100114984
   Google Scholar
• Chong, I. (Forthcoming). Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Written Comments in Two Secondary Classrooms. RELC Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. M., and L. M. Goldstein. 1999. “ESL Student Revision after Teacher-written Comments: Text, Contexts, and Individuals.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (2): 147–179.10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, T., S. Pittaway, H. Yost, and R. McCarthy. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback is a Continuing Two-way Communication That Encourages Progress.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (3): 349–362.10.1080/02602938.2011.632676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, L. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning (2nd ed.) E-reader version. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ende, J., A. Pomerantz, and F. Erickson. 1995. “Preceptorsʼ Strategies for Correcting Residents in an Ambulatory Care Medicine Setting.” Academic Medicine 70 (3): 224–9.10.1097/00001888-199503000-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. 2011. “Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 51–62.10.1080/02602930903197883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., H. Liu, A. Sinha, and M. Senna. 2013. “Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 307–329.10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–developmental Inquiry.” American Psychologist 34 (10): 906–911.10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, S. P., and A. M. Bosanquet. 2006. “The Curriculum? That’s Just a Unit Outline, Isn’t It?” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 269–284.10.1080/03075070600680521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 2006. “How Assessment Frames Student Learning.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 23–36. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Does Your Assessment Support Your Students’ Learning.” Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 1 (1): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, C., and E. Brown. 2006. “Written Feedback for Students: Too Much, Too Detailed or Too Incomprehensible to Be Effective?” Bioscience Education 7 (1): 1–16.10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human interests. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L., and J. Chen. 1999. “An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Teacher Feedback on Student Writing.” English Language Teaching and Learning 3: 207–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hanh, N. D., and R. Ramnath. 2016. “Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam.” The New English Teacher: An International Journal 10 (1): 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. 1998. “The Emotional Practice of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 14: 835–854.10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R. 2012. “Positioning Theory: Moral Dimensions of Social-cultural Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology, edited by J. Valsiner, 191–206. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. 2005. “Yes, a Very Good Point! A Critical Genre Analysis of a Corpus of Feedback Commentaries on Master of Education Assignments.” Teaching in Higher Education 10 (3): 339–353.10.1080/13562510500122222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. 1998. “The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 7 (3): 255–286.10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2013a. “Student Perceptions of Hidden Messages in Teacher Written Feedback.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (3): 180–187.10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2013b. “Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 240–253.10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006a. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (02): 83–101.10.1017/S0261444806003399
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006b. Feedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524742
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D., and C. Davis. 2000. “Bearing Bad News: Reactions to Negative Performance Feedback.” Applied Psychology 49 (3): 550–565.10.1111/apps.2000.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H. (2013). “Metacognitive Knowledge in Second Language Writing.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R. 2013. “Two Portfolio Systems: EFL Students’ Perceptions of Writing Ability, Text Improvement, and Feedback.” Assessing Writing 18 (2): 132–153.10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, R. 2015. “Feedback about Self-regulation: Does It Remain an ‘Unfinished Business’ in Portfolio Assessment of Writing?” TESOL Quarterly 49 (2): 402–413.10.1002/tesq.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latting, J. 1992. Assessment in Education: A Search for Clarity in the Growing Debate. Berkeley: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2008. “Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 144–164.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201–213.10.1002/tesq.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and D. L. Schallert. 2008. “Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher-student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 165–182.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I. 1991. “The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College-level Writing Classes.” Foreign Language Annals 24 (3): 203–218.10.1111/flan.1991.24.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A. 2017. “‘I Feel Disappointed’: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses towards Teacher Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72.10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P., S. Meier, and R. Rinderer. 1985. “Self-efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-evaluation.” College Composition and Communication 36 (4): 465–471.10.2307/357865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., F. Borrell-Carrió, and R. Epstein. 2013. “The Impact of Emotions in Feedback.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 50–71. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulliner, E., and M. Tucker. 2015. “Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., S. Sosnovsky, L. Schnaubert, E. Andrès, A. Eichelmann, G. Goguadze, and E. Melis. 2014. “Exploring Feedback and Student Characteristics Relevant for Personalizing Feedback Strategies.” Computers & Education 71: 56–76.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517.10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianko, S. 1979. “A Description of the Composing Processes of College Freshman Writers.” Research in the Teaching of English 13 (1): 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. 2000. “The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-regulated Learning.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich and M. Zeidner, 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2003. “A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (4): 667.10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porte, G. K. 1997. “The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 61–78.10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90006-0
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O'Donovan. 2010. “Feedback: All That Effort, but What is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–289.10.1080/02602930903541007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896.10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassaei, E. 2013. “Corrective Feedback, Learners’ Perceptions, and Second Language Development.” System 41 (2): 472–483.10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. 1984. “Television is ‘Easy’ and Print is ‘Tough’: The Differential Investment of Mental Effort in Learning as a Function of Perceptions and Attributions.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (4): 647.10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1995. “Self-efficacy, Motivation, and Performance.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 7 (2): 112–137.10.1080/10413209508406961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 2003. “Self-efficacy for Reading and Writing: Influence of Modeling, Goal Setting, and Self-evaluation.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 19 (2): 159–172.10.1080/10573560308219
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 2005. “Self-regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 85–94.10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and P. A. Ertmer. 2000. “Self-regulation and Academic Learning: Self-efficacy Enhancing Interventions.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by B. Monique, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 631–649. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. 1980. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (4): 378–388.10.2307/356588
   Google Scholar
• Straub, R. 1997. “Students’ Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study.” Research in the Teaching of English 31 (1): 91–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, F. (2016). Immediate and Delayed Effects of Embedded Metacognitive Instruction on Chinese EFL Students’ English Writing and Regulation of Cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity 22: 289–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, M., H. van den Bergh, G. Rijlaarsdam, and T. Sanders. 2011. “Relating Self Reports of Writing Behaviour and Online Task Execution Using a Temporal Model.” Metacognition and Learning 6 (3): 229–253.10.1007/s11409-011-9072-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. 2004. Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B., and M. Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170.10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, C. E., T. W. Acee, and J. Jung. 2011. “Self-regulation and Learning Strategies.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011 (126): 45–53.10.1002/tl.v2011.126
   Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. 1998. “Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 19 (4): 515–537.10.1093/applin/19.4.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297.10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, H. B., and J. C. K. Lee. 2012. “Be Passionate, but Be Rational as Well: Emotional Rules for Chinese Teachers’ Work.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (1): 56–65.10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. 1982. “Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning.” TESOL Quarterly 16 (2): 195–209.10.2307/3586792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. 1983. “The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies.” TESOL Quarterly 17: 165–187.10.2307/3586647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2003. “Emotions and Teacher Identity: A Poststructural Perspective.” Teachers and Teaching 9: 213–238.10.1080/13540600309378
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Self-efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 82–91.10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar