Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment

References

• Ahern, T. C., and V. Durrington. 1995. “Effects of Anonymity and Group Saliency on Participation and Interaction in a Computer-mediated Small-group Discussion.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28 (2): 133–147.10.1080/08886504.1995.10782156
   Google Scholar
• Ames, G. J., and F. B. Murray. 1982. “When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Promoting Cognitive Change by Social Conflict.” Developmental Psychology 18: 894–897.10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. W. 2001. “Peer Assessment: A Win–Win Instructional Strategy for Both Students and Teachers.” Journal of Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching 10 (2): 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, I., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2006. “Designing Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: Analysis of Written and Oral Peer Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (2): 135–147.10.1080/13562510500527685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock, S. 2000. Student Peer Assessment, Learning Technology. Accessed http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/landt/lt/docs/bostock_peer_assessment.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard, K. L. 2016. “Anonymity as a Double-edge Sword: Reflecting on the Implications of Online Qualitative Research in Studying Sensitive Topics.” The Qualitative Report 21 (1): 59–67. Accessed http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss1/5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G. J., and Reinig, B. A. 2003. “A Theory and Measurement of Meeting Satisfaction”. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 6–9, 2003, Big Island, Hawaii. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173677
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. 2001. “Peer Collaboration and Discourse Patterns in Learning from Incompatible Information.” Instructional Science 29: 443–479.10.1023/A:1012099909179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 1999. “Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (3): 301–314.10.1080/0260293990240304
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., C. D. Schunn, and R. Wilson. 2006. “Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 891–901.10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 2000. “Computerized Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 37 (4): 346–355.10.1080/135580000750052955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 1986. “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11: 146–166.10.1080/0260293860110206
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2007. “The Place of Peers in Learning and Assessment.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 128–143. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2007. Cooperative Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483329598
   Google Scholar
• Gratz, R. K. 1990. “Improving Lab Report Quality by Model Analysis, Peer Review, and Revision.” Journal of College Science Teaching 19 (5): 292–295.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., and B. Wellman. 1997. “Asynchronous Learning Networks as a Virtual Classroom.” Communications of the ACM 40 (9): 44–49.10.1145/260750.260764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe, C. 2010. A History of East Asia: From the Origins of Civilization to the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsi, S., and C. M. Hoadley. 1997. “Productive Discussion in Science: Gender Equity Through Electronic Discourse.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 6 (1): 23–36.10.1023/A:1022564817713
   Google Scholar
• Jong, B.-S., C.-H. Lai, Y.-T. Hsia, and T.-W. Lin. 2013. “Effects of Anonymity in Group Discussion on Peer Interaction and Learning Achievement.” IEEE Transactions on Education 56 (3): 292–299.10.1109/TE.2012.2217379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., D. Zubrow, A. M. Moses, and V. Geller. 1985. “Affect in Computer-mediated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-terminal Discussion.” Human Computer Interaction 1: 77–104.10.1207/s15327051hci0101_3
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., and F. Fischer. 2010. “Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 344–348.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, A. C., and M. Tomasello. 1986. “Transactive Discussions with Peers and Adults.” Developmental Psychology 22 (5): 681–685.10.1037/0012-1649.22.5.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, R. C. W., and J. Ma. 1999. “Use of a Group Support System for Collaborative Assessment.” Computers and Education 32 (2): 109–125.10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00059-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2007. “Effects of Critical Assessment Training on Quality of Peer Feedback and Quality of Students’ Final Projects in Peer Assessment.” Doctoral diss., Accessed ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database (Order No. 3271906).
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2009. “Analyzing Peer Feedback in a Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” In Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education, edited by C. D. Maddaux, 213–221. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Research 41 (3): 525–536.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and Y. Zhou. 2012. “Give and Take: A Re-analysis of Assessor and Assessee Roles in Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” British Journal of Educational Research 43 (3): 376–384.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., and A. L. Steckelberg. 2005. “Impact of Technology-mediated Peer Assessment on Student Project Quality.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Orlando, FL, October.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., A. L. Steckelberg, and S. Srinivasan. 2008. “Utilizing Peer Interactions to Promote Learning Through a Computer-assisted Peer Assessment System.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 34 (2): 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Light, P., E. Nesbitt, V. Light, and S. White. 2000. “Variety is the Spice of Life: Student use of CMC in the Context of Campus Based Study.” Computers & Education 34: 257–267.10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00049-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S. J., E. Z. Liu, and S. M. Yuan. 2001. “Web-based Peer Assessment: Feedback for Students with Various Thinking-styles.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17: 420–432.10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S. J., E. Z. F. Liu, and S. M. Yuan. 2002. “Student Attitudes Toward Networked Peer Assessment: Case Studies of Undergraduate Students and Senior High School Students.” International Journal of Instructional Media 29 (2): 241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and L. Li. 2013. “Assessment Training Effects on Student Assessment Skills and Task Performance in a Technology-facilitated Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (3): 275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., and A. M. Clifford. 2013. “‘Just Enough to Make You Take It Seriously’: Exploring Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 65: 677–693.10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, H. A., H. W. Hildebrandt, and J. P. Thomas. 1997. Effective Business Communications. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B., and A. J. Flanagin. 2003. “Reconceptualizing ‘Flaming’ and Other Problematic Messages.” New Media & Society 5 (1): 69–94.10.1177/1461444803005001908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, N. 2001. “An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (3): 235–246.10.1080/02602930120052396
   Google Scholar
• Prins, F., D. Sluijsmans, P. Kirschner, and J. W. Strijbos. 2005. “Formative Peer Assessment in a CSCL Environment: A Case Study.” Assessment 30 (4): 417–444.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., and C. Rajah-Kanagasabai. 2013. ““ I’d Be So Much More Comfortable Posting Anonymously”: Identified Versus Anonymous Participation in Student Discussion Boards.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29 (5): 612–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550.10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., and C. Bereiter. 1996. “Computer Support for Knowledge-building Communities.” In CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, edited by T. Koschmann, 249–268. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, and T. W. McGuire. 1986. “Group Processes in Computer-mediated Communication.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37: 157–187.10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, G. K. 1989. “Student Peer Review in the Classroom: A Teaching and Grading Tool.” Journal of Agronomic Education 18: 105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. 2002. Establishing Learning Effects with Integrated Peer Assessment Tasks. Accessed March 10, 2014 http://78.158.56.101/archive/palatine/files/930.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer. 2002. “Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education: Effects on Performance and Perceptions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 443–454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311.
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., and S. Kiesler. 1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.” Management Science 32 (11): 1492–1512.10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. A. 1992. “Comparison of Collaborative Self, Peer and Tutor Assessment in a Biochemistry Practical.” Biochemical Education 20 (3): 148–151.10.1016/0307-4412(92)90057-S
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, L. A. J. 1994. “Peer, Self and Tutor Assessment: Relative Reliabilities.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (1): 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., K. Chang, S. Chiou, and H. Hou. 2005. “The Design and Application of a Web-based Self- and Peer-assessment System.” Computers & Education 45 (2): 187–202.10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomai, M., M. E. Mebane, V. Rosa, and M. Benedetti. 2014. “Can Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Promote Counter-stereotypical Gender Communication Styles in Male and Female University Students?” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 4384–4392. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.952.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2003. “Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility.” In Optimizing New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, edited by M. Segers, F. Dochy and E. Cascallar, 55–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/0-306-48125-1
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2008. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 2010. “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 339–343.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169.10.1080/713611428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S.-C., and C.-C. Tsai. 2010. “Taiwan College Students’ Self-efficacy and Motivation of Learning in Online Peer Assessment Environments.” The Internet and Higher Education 13 (3): 164–169.10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, T., and G. Dall’Alba. 2007. “Students’ Experience of Peer Assessment in a Professional Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5): 541–556.10.1080/02602930601116896
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. J., M. M. Diao, and L. Huang. 2015. “‘I’m Not Here to Learn How to Mark Someone Else’s Stuff’: An Investigation of an Online Peer-to-peer Review Workshop Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 15–32.10.1080/02602938.2014.881980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y.-F. 2011. “A Reciprocal Peer Review System to Support College Students’ Writing.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (4): 687–700. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar