Understanding autonomous peer feedback practices among postgraduate students: a case study in a Chinese university

References

• Barnard, R., R. de Luca, and J. Li. 2015. “First-year Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Lecturer and Peer Feedback: A New Zealand Action Research Project.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (5): 933–944. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.881343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies : Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203448885
   Google Scholar
• Caffarella, R. S., and B. G. Barnett. 2000. “Teaching Doctoral Students to Become Scholarly Writers: The Importance of Giving and Receiving Critiques.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (1): 39–52. doi:10.1080/030750700116000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, G., and A. Walker. 2011. “A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing.” Research in Higher Education 52 (5): 508–536. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9204-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnell, B. 2016. “Aiming for Autonomy: Formative Peer Assessment in a Final-year Undergraduate Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1269–1283. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1077196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. C., and H. Y. Ku. 2009. “An Investigation of the Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2003. “Involving Students in Assessment.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 3 (2): 102–108. doi:10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenz, O. 2005. “EFL Writers’ Social Networks: Impact on Advanced Academic Literacy Development.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (4): 339–351. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. 2008. “Learning Relations and Networks in Web-based Communities.” International Journal of Web Based Communities 4 (2): 140–158.10.1504/IJWBC.2008.017669
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2002. “Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing.” Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 215–239. doi:10.1093/applin/23.2.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses : Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.6719
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and E. Stracke. 2011. “Examiners’ Reports on Theses: Feedback or Assessment?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10 (4): 211–222. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback the Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give is Better than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogessie, M. 2015. “Peer-assessment in Higher Education – Twenty-first Century Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 226–251. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, G., and M. Kiley. 2002. “‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How Experienced Examiners Assess Research Theses.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2005. “Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: A Qualitative Interview Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/02602930500099177.
   Google Scholar
• Poverjuc, O., V. Brooks, and D. Wray. 2012. “Using Peer Feedback in a Master’s Programme: A Multiple Case Study.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (4): 465–477. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.641008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, N., and A. Cox. 2014. “International Students’ Networks: A Case Study in a UK University.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (1): 182–198. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory Into Practice 48 (1): 20–27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribble, C., and U. Wingate. 2013. “From Text to Corpus – A Genre-based Approach to Academic Literacy Instruction.” System 41 (2): 307–321. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Värlander, S. 2008. “The Role of Students’ Emotions in Formal Feedback Situations.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (2): 145–156. doi:10.1080/13562510801923195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. 2016. “Using Rubrics in Student Self-assessment: Student Perceptions in the English as a Foreign Language Writing Context.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education: 1–13. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. 2011. “A Reciprocal Peer Review System to Support College Students’ Writing.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (4): 687–700. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2013. “Understanding Supervisors’ Commentary Practices in Doctoral Research Proposal Writing: A Hong Kong Study.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 22 (4): 473–483. doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar