Inside the ‘body box’: exploring feedback in higher education

References

• Anguera, M. T., O. Camerino, and M. Castañer. 2012. “Mixed Methods Procedures and Designs for Research.” In Mixed Methods Research in the Movement Sciences, edited by O. Camerino, M. Castañer and M. T. Anguera, 3–27. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self Efficacy: Toward a Unifing Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action : A Social Cognitive Theory/Albert Bandura, xiii. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 617 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1994. “Bandura Self-efficacy Defined.” In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 71–81. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2013. “Ma(R)king Time: Material Entanglements and Re-Memberings: Cutting Together Apart.” In How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies, edited by P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, and H. Tsoukas, 16–31. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, K. 2011. Dancing across the Page. Chicago, IL: Intellect , University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–148. doi:10.1002/hrm.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, and D. William. 1999. “Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box.” Assessment 1–12. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/beyond_blackbox.pdf%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Assessment+for+Learning:+Beyond+the+Black+Box.#2%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=inti.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bols, A., and K. Wicklow. 2013. “Feedback – What Students Want.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 19–29. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “What is the Problem with Feedback?” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 1–10. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. 2004. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Implications for Policy and Professional Development.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 11 (3): 301–318. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304609.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., and G. H. F. Hirschfeld. 2008. “Students’ Conceptions of Assessment: Links to Outcomes.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 15 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/09695940701876003.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., S. K. F. Hui, F. W. M. Yu, and K. J. Kennedy. 2011. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment in Chinese Contexts: A Tripartite Model of Accountability, Improvement, and Irrelevance.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (5–6): 307–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, A., S. Gherardi, and L. L. Parolin. 2007. “Knowing in a System of Fragmented Knowledge.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 14 (1–2): 83–102. doi:10.1080/10749030701307754.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. S., and M. Taras. 2016. “A Comparison of Assessment Beliefs of Science and Education Lecturers in a University.” Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research 6 (1): 77. doi:10.17583/remie.2016.1766.10.17583/remie.2016.1766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. 2004. “Informal Learning in the Workplace.” Studies in Continuing Education 26 (2): 247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. 2010. “Re-Thinking the “Thing”.” Journal of Workplace Learning 22 (1/2): 104–116. doi:10.1108/13665621011012898.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., and P. Landri. 2012. “Materialities, Textures and Pedagogies: Socio-material Assemblages in Education.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 20 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.649421.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., M. Nerland, and K. Jensen. 2012. “Sociomaterial Approaches to Conceptualising Professional Learning and Practice.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644901.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., and A. Strati. 1988. “The Temporal Dimension in Organizational Studies.” Organization Studies 9 (2): 149–164. doi:10.1177/017084068800900201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., D. Nicolini, and A. Strati. 2007. “The Passion for Knowing.” Organization 14 (3): 315–329. doi:10.1177/1350508407076146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greence, J. C., and V. Caracelli. 2003. “Making Paradigmatic Sense of Mixed Methods Practice.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 91–110. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. 2016. Professional Practice and Learning. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-26164-5
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, D. 1937. www.dorishumphrey.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. 1997. “A Reconceptualisation of the Research into University Academics’ Conceptions of Teaching.” Learning and Instruction 7 (3): 255–275. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and L. Gow. 1994. “Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning.” The Journal of Higher Education 65 (1): 58. doi:10.2307/2943877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M., S. Billett, S. Gherardi, and L. Grealish. 2015. Practice-based Learning in Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9502-9.
   Google Scholar
• Laban, R. 2011. The Mastery of Movement. Edited by L. Ullmann. Binsted: Dance Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Production. Vol. 9. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000129.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle. 1997. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S., M. Price, D. Carless, and M. Taras. 2013. Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education. Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: Developing Dialogue with Students. doi:10.4324/9780203522813.
   Google Scholar
• NUS. 2010. Feedback and Assessment Campaign Toolkit. https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/resources/assessment-and-feedback-benchmarking-tool.
   Google Scholar
• Pentassuglia, M. 2017. “‘The Art(ist) is Present’: Arts-based Research Perspective in Educational Research.” Cogent Education 4 (1): 1301011. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. 1983. “On the Definition of Feedback.” Behavioral Science 28 (1): 4–13. doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 1993. “Wittgenstein: Mind, Body, and Society.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23 (3): 285–313. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1993.tb00242.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 1996. “Practiced Bodies: Subjects, Genders, and Minds.” In The Social and Political Body, edited by T. R. Schatzki and W. Natter, 49–77. London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2009. “Timespace and the Organization of Social Life.” In Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture, edited by F. Trentmann and R. Wilk, 35–48. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2010. “The Timespace of Human Activity.” In The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events, 1–64. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VwlxaZQh9MUC&pg=PR11&lpg=PR11&dq=time+space+interrelate&source=bl&ots=L2zycPSFtG&sig=sKAupusKCey2PCcRKMVd2pcApRg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DzByU_ePMq2M7AaYyYCADw&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=timespaceinterrelate&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., K. Knorr Cetina, and E. Von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. Von Savigny, Rassegna Italiana Di Sociologia. Vol. 44. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. 1967. “The Methodology of Evaluation.” In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, edited by R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné and M. Scriven, 39–83. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2007. “The Time of Materiality.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 8 (1). doi:10.17169/fqs-8.1.207.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. 2009. The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. the Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511576362.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2002. “Using Assessment for Learning and Learning from Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (6): 501–510. doi:10.1080/0260293022000020273.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2003. “To Feedback or Not to Feedback in Student Self-assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (5): 549–565. doi:10.1080/02602930301678.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2005. “Assessment – Summative and Formative – Some Theoretical Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4): 466–478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2007a. “Assessment for Learning: Understanding Theory to Improve Practice.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (4): 363–371. doi:10.1080/03098770701625746.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2007b. “Machinations of Assessment: Metaphors, Myths and Realities.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 15 (1): 55–69. doi:10.1080/14681360601162212.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2009. “Summative Assessment: The Missing Link for Formative Assessment.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33 (1): 57–69. doi:10.1080/03098770802638671.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2010. “Assessment for Learning: Assessing the Theory and Evidence.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2: 3015–3022. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.457.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2012. “Assessing Assessment Theories.” Online Educational Research Journal 3 (12): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2013. “Feedback on Feedback: Uncrossing Wires across Sectors.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 30–40. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M., and M. S. Davies. 2013. “Perceptions and Realities in the Functions and Processes of Assessment.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1177/1469787412467128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. “Movement-space: The Changing Domain of Thinking Resulting from the Development of New Kinds of Spatial Awareness.” Economy and Society 33 (4): 582–604. doi:10.1080/0308514042000285305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2006. “Space.” Theory, Culture and Society 23 (2–3): 139–146. doi:10.1177/0263276406063780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., and A. W. Hoy. 2001. “Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (7): 783–805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., A. W. Hoy, and W. K. Hoy. 1998. “Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure.” Review of Educational Research 68 (2): 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, D. 2012. “Practical Knowledge: Knowing How to and Knowing That.” Mind 121 (481): 97–130. doi:10.1093/mind/fzs026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., and J. A. Burry-Stock. 2003. “Classroom Assessment Practices and Teachers’ Self-perceived Assessment Skills.” Applied Measurement in Education 16 (4): 323–342. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar