The role of attitudinal factors in mathematical on-line assessments: a study of undergraduate STEM students

References

• Adesina, A., R.G. Stone, and I. Jones. 2015. “A Semi-automatic Computer-aided Assessment Approach for Marking and Providing Feedback Comments.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Lisbon, Portugal, edited by S. Zvacek, M. T. Restivo, J. Uhomoibhi, and M. Helfert, 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus, S. D., and J. Watson. 2009. “Does Regular Online Testing Enhance Student Learning in the Numerical Sciences? Robust Evidence from a Large Data Set.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 255–272.10.1111/bjet.2009.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attali, Y., and M. Arieli-Attali. 2015. “Gamification in Assessment: Do Points Affect Test Performance?” Computers & Education 83: 57–63.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1): 74–94.10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., J. Bull, and M. Pendlebury. 1997. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, R., and D. Vogel. 2013. “Predicting User Acceptance of Collaborative Technologies: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning.” Computers & Education 63: 160–175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigdem, H., and S. Oncu. 2015. “E-assessment Adaptation at a Military Vocational College: Student Perceptions.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (5): 971–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen, K. J., and D. W. Brooks. 2002. “An Analysis of Student Learning at a Testing Web Site Emphasizing Descriptive Chemistry.” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21 (2): 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1993. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 (3): 475–487.10.1006/imms.1993.1022
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1992. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (14): 1111–1132.10.1111/jasp.1992.22.issue-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettori, G., R. Garuti, and E. Lemut. 2002. “From Arithmetic to Algebraic Thinking by Using a Spreadsheet.” Perspectives on School Algebra, edited by R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, and R. Lins, 191–207. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/0-306-47223-6
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, C., T. Reiners, and H. Dreher. 2011. “Investigating Factors Affecting the Uptake of Automated Assessment Technology.” Journal of Information Technology Education 20 (2): 211–214.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intension and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, P., and C. Haines. 1998. “Disentangling the Nexus: Attitudes to Mathematics and Technology in a Computer Learning Environment.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 36 (3): 275–290.10.1023/A:1003198120666
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Conditions under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 (1): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. V. 2005. “What is the Role of ICT-based Assessment in Universities?” Studies in Higher Education 30: 171–180.10.1080/03075070500043176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, O., K. Liehr-Gobbers, and M. Krafft. 2010. “Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach.” In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, edited by V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang, 691–711. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8
   Google Scholar
• Haddif, G. N., and M. Yerushalmy. 2015. “Digital Interactive Assessment in Mathematics: The Case of Construction E-tasks.” In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01289357/.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, P., and M. Y. C. Pang. 2012. “Effective Formative E-assessment of Student Learning: A Study on a Statistics Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (2): 215–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooshyar, D., R. B. Ahmad, M. Yousefi, M. Fathi, S.-J. Horng, and H. Lim. 2016. “Applying an Online Game-based Formative Assessment in a Flowchart-based Intelligent Tutoring System for Improving Problem-solving Skills.” Computers & Education 94: 18–36.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., and A. Simpson. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Assessment in Undergraduate Mathematics.” Research in Mathematics Education 15 (1): 17–33.10.1080/14794802.2012.756634
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. 2014. “E-assessment for Learning? Exploring the Potential of Computer-marked Assessment and Computer-generated Feedback, from Short-answer Questions to Assessment Analytics.” PhD diss., The Open University. http://oro.open.ac.uk/41115/.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, K. M. 2012. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, F. M., T. J. H. M. Eggen, C. F. Timmers, and B. P. Veldkamp. 2012. “Effects of Feedback in a Computer-based Assessment for Learning.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 263–272.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., N. Jankowski, S. O. Ikenberry, and J. Kinzie. 2014. Knowing What Students Know and Can Do: The Current State of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment in US Colleges and Universities. Urbana: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/2013%20Surve%20Report%20Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S.-H., H.-L. Liao, and J. A. Pratt. 2009. “Impact of Media Richness and Flow on E-learning Technology Acceptance.” Computers & Education 52 (3): 599–607.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, L. 2009. “Effects of Delayed and Immediate Feedback in the Computer-based Testing Environment.” PhD diss., Indiana State University. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304900802/abstract?accountid=12253.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, K., R. Krumsvik, and B. Furnes. 2015. “Creating Formative Feedback Spaces in Large Lectures.” Computers & Education 88: 48–63.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sierra, G., M. E. Valle-Zequeida, M. Miranda-Tirado, and C. Dolores-Flores. 2016. “Social Representations of High School Students about Mathematics Assessment.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 16 (3): 247–258.10.1080/14926156.2015.1119336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastering critique. 2014. “I Hate Mastering Physics.” Accessed 6/10/2017. https://redd.it/1x8deh, https://redd.it/52godk.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2009a. “Formative Computer-based Assessment in Higher Education: The Effectiveness of Feedback in Supporting Student Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 181–192.10.1080/02602930801956075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2009b. “Formative Computer-based Assessments: The Potentials and Pitfalls of Two Formative Computer-based Assessments Used in Professional Learning Programs.” PhD diss., Queen’s University, Belfast. http://hdl.handle.net/1974/1677.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J.-W., and Y.-G. Kim. 2001. “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context.” Information & Management 38 (4): 217–230.10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31: 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., and A. A. Economides. 2016. “The Impact of Paper-based, Computer-based and Mobile-based Self-assessment on Students’ Science Motivation and Achievement.” Computers in Human Behavior 55 (Part B): 1241–1248.10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, C. S., J. Y. Lai, and Y. S. Wang. 2004. “Factors Affecting Engineers’ Acceptance of Asynchronous E-learning Systems in High-tech Companies.” Information and Management 41: 795–804.10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltenburg, M., M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, and B. Doig. 2009. “Mathematical Power of Special-needs Pupils: An ICT-based Dynamic Assessment Format to Reveal Weak Pupils’ Learning Potential.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 273–284.10.1111/bjet.2009.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, H. C., P. Drijvers, and P. A. Kirschner. 2010. “Effects of Attitudes and Behaviours on Learning Mathematics with Computer Tools.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 1–15.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., S. Wende, and A. Will. 2005. “SmartPLS Software ‘SmartPLS 2.0,’ Hamburg.” http://www.pls-sem.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, L. D., and M. M. Weil. 1995. “Computer Anxiety: A Cross-cultural Comparison of University Students in Ten Countries.” Computers in Human Behavior 11 (1): 45–64.10.1016/0747-5632(94)00021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangwin, C. 2013. Computer Aided Assessment of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660353.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sangwin, C., and N. Köcher. 2016. “Automation of Mathematics Examinations.” Computers & Education 94: 215–227.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2009. “Modelling Technology Acceptance in Education: A Study of Pre-service Teachers.” Computers & Education 52 (2): 302–312.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. 2012. “Examining the Intention to Use Technology among Pre-service Teachers: An Integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior.” Interactive Learning Environments 20 (1): 3–18.10.1080/10494821003714632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzis, V. 2012. “Integrating Personalized, Emotional and Physiological Measurements into the Technological Accpetance Model: A Study Based on the Acceptance of a Computer Based Acceptance Model.” PhD diss., University of Macedonia. http://dspace.lib.uom.gr/handle/2159/15672.
   Google Scholar
• Terzis, V., and A. A. Economides. 2011. “The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment.” Computers & Education 56 (4): 1032–1044.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzis, V., C. N. Moridis, and A. A. Economides. 2012. “The Effect of Emotional Feedback on Behavioral Intention to Use Computer Based Assessment.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 710–721.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., C. A. Higgins, and J. M. Howell. 1991. “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization.” MIS Quarterly 15 (1): 125–143.10.2307/249443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursini, S., G. Sánchez, and M. Orendain. 2004. “ Validación Y Confiabilidad De Una Escala De Actitudes Hacia Las Matemáticas Y Hacia Las Matemáticas Enseñadas Con Computadora.” Educación Matemática 16 (3): 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–365.10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walet, N. R., and M. Birch. 2012. “Using Online Assessment to Provide Instant Feedback.” In Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference (2012) (Vols. 1-0). The Higher Education Academy. http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.11120/stem.hea.2012.095.
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D. M. 2009. “Editorial: E-assessment: Developing New Dialogues for the Digital Age.” British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (2): 199–202.10.1111/bjet.2009.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D. M., and A. Brasher. 2006. “Developing a Roadmap for E-assessment: Which Way Now?” In Proceedings of the 10th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, edited by M. Danson, 487–501. Loughborough. http://oro.open.ac.uk/11950/.
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D., and Y. Raw. 2003. “Taking an Electronic Mathematics Examination from Home: What the Students Think.” In Computer Based Learning in Science, New Technologies and Their Applications in Education, edited by C. P. Constantinou and Z. C. Zacharia, Vol. 1, Nicosia, 701–713. Cyprus: Department of Educational Sciences, University of Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2002. “The Learning Web the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Internet-based Undergraduate Materials for the Teaching of Key Skills.” Active Learning in Higher Education 3 (1): 40–53.10.1177/1469787402003001004
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., C. Boyd, L. Chen, and S. Jamal. 2011. “Improving Student Performance in a First-year Geography Course: Examining the Importance of Computer-assisted Formative Assessment.” Computers & Education 57 (2): 1493–1500.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. J., K. M. Harrington, S. L. Clark, and M. W. Miller. 2013. “Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models an Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 73 (6): 913–934.10.1177/0013164413495237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar